Psycholinguistik / Kognitive Linguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (66)
- Part of a Book (61)
- Conference Proceeding (10)
- Book (4)
- Part of Periodical (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Review (2)
Keywords
- Deutsch (33)
- Kognitive Linguistik (33)
- Psycholinguistik (22)
- Konversationsanalyse (14)
- Experimentelle Psychologie (13)
- Augenfolgebewegung (11)
- Sprachverarbeitung <Psycholinguistik> (11)
- Textverstehen (11)
- Blickbewegung (10)
- Kognitive Grammatik (10)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (67)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (27)
- Postprint (25)
- Ahead of Print (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- de Gruyter (42)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (5)
- De Gruyter (4)
- Equinox (4)
- SAGE (4)
- Sage (4)
- Wiley (4)
- Benjamins (3)
- Elsevier (3)
- Frontiers Media S.A. (3)
Much language-related research in cognitive robotics appeals to usage-based models of language as proposed in cognitive linguistics and developmental psychology [1, 2] that emphasise the significance of learning, embodiment and general cognitive development for human language acquisition. Over and above these issues, however, what takes centre stage in these theories are social-cognitive skills of “intention-reading” that are seen as “primary in the language acquisition process” [1] – and also as difficult to incorporate into computational models of language acquisition. The present paper addresses these concerns: we describe work in progress on a series of experiments that take steps towards closing the gap between ‘solipsistic’ symbol grounding in individual robotic agents and socially framed embodied language acquisition in learners that attend to common ground [3] with changing interlocutors.
Research on syntactic ambiguity resolution in language comprehension has shown that subjects' processing decisions are influenced by a variety of heterogeneous factors such as e.g., syntactic complexity, semantic fit and the discourse frequency of the competing structures. The present paper investigates a further potentially relevant factor in such processes: effects of syntagmatic lexical chunking (or matching to a complex memorized prefab) whose occurrence would be predicted from usage-based assumptions about linguistic categorisation. Focusing on the widely studied so-called DO/SC-ambiguity in which a post-verbal NP is syntactically ambiguous between a direct object and the subject of an embedded clause, potentially biasing collocational chunks of the relevant type are identified in a number of corpus-linguistic pretests and then investigated in a self-paced reading experiment. The results show a significant increase in processing difficulty from a collocationally neutral over a lexically biasing to a strongly biasing condition. This suggests that syntagmatically complex and partially schematic templates of the kind envisioned in usage-based Construction Grammar may impinge on speakers' online processing decisions during sentence comprehension.
Introduction
(2008)
‘Linguistic relativity’ has become a major keyword in debates on the psychological significance of language diversity. In this context, the term ‘relativity’ was originally taken on loan from Einstein’s then-recent theories by Edward Sapir (1924) and Benjamin L. Whorf (1940). The present paper assesses how far the idea of linguistic relativity does analogically build on relevant insights in modern physics, and fails to find any substantial analogies. The term was used rhetorically by Sapir and Whorf, and has since been incorporated into a cognitivist research programme that seeks to answer whether ‘language influences thought’. Contemporary research on ‘linguistic relativity’ has developed into a distinct way of studying language diversity, which shares a lot with the universalistic cognitivist framework it opposes, but little with relational approaches in science.
Altern und Identitätsarbeit
(2009)
Sigmund Freuds Sprachdenken
(2002)