Pragmalinguistik / Kommunikationsforschung
Refine
Year of publication
- 2019 (21) (remove)
Document Type
- Article (10)
- Part of a Book (9)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (21)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (8)
- Deutsch (6)
- Interaktionsanalyse (6)
- Pragmatik (6)
- Interaktion (5)
- Kommunikation (5)
- Multimodalität (4)
- Gespräch (3)
- Ukrainisch (3)
- Dialog (2)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (11)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (9)
- Postprint (6)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (12)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (9)
Publisher
The article deals with communicative failures of journalists in “YouTube” celebrity video interviews in the Ukrainian and German linguacultures from the point of view of social interaction and the theory of speech genres at all structural levels of the communicative genre construction, establishing common and distinctive features in both linguacultures. The analysis made it possible to conclude that behind a language (speech) failure there is a violation caused by a journalist, a respondent, or an external noise.
Mangelhafter Adressatenzuschnitt in ukrainischen und deutschen politischen Youtube-Interviews
(2019)
The article investigates Ukrainian and German YouTube interviews from the point of view of contrastive linguistics. The purpose of this paper is to separate out the interview as a communicative genre and to determine the main aspects of research on discrepancies in expectations among interview participants, in particular to clarify the role of poor recipient design as the cause of communication failures. Results indicate that poor recipient design is the most common source of communication failures in both languages.
Статтю присвячено дослідженню комунікативних невдач у мовленнєвому жанрі відеоінтерв’ю крізь призму української національної ідентичності. Визначено тематику, типи і жанрово-мовну специфіку українського відеоінтерв’ю як зразка діалогічного мовлення. Встановлено специфіку комунікативних невдач у цьому жанрі (зі спортсменами, політиками і культурними діячами) з огляду на позиції комунікантів, структурні рівні досліджуваного жанру та максими спілкування.
This paper focuses on so called syntactic projection phenomena in the German language. This term from the German Gesprächsforschung is used to define the fact that an utterance or part of it foreshadows another one. This paper aims at pointing out how such projection phenomena are consciously exploited for rhethorical purposes. This will be observed on the basis of excerpts from the Stuttgart 21 mediation talks. The linguistic analysis carried out in this paper will focus on syntactic projection phenomena involving the use of causal adverbial connectives deshalb and deswegen.
Speech planning is a sophisticated process. In dialog, it regularly starts in overlap with an incoming turn by a conversation partner. We show that planning spoken responses in overlap with incoming turns is associated with higher processing load than planning in silence. In a dialogic experiment, participants took turns with a confederate describing lists of objects. The confederate’s utterances (to which participants responded) were pre-recorded and varied in whether they ended in a verb or an object noun and whether this ending was predictable or not. We found that response planning in overlap with sentence-final verbs evokes larger task-evoked pupillary responses, while end predictability had no effect. This finding indicates that planning in overlap leads to higher processing load for next speakers in dialog and that next speakers do not proactively modulate the time course of their response planning based on their predictions of turn endings. The turn-taking system exerts pressure on the language processing system by pushing speakers to plan in overlap despite the ensuing increase in processing load.
In diesem Beitrag geht es vor allem um die Frage, wie das Smartphone in der Alltagskommunikation als gemeinsamer Bezugspunkt relevant gemacht wird und wie sich die Reaktionen der Interagierenden zum auf dem Display Gezeigten gestalten. Es zeigt sich, dass diese in mehrere responsive Schritte unterteilt werden, in denen die Aufmerksamkeit gebündelt und das Display fokussiert wird sowie eine Abstimmung darüber erfolgt, wie das Gezeigte zu kontextualisieren ist.
In German oral discourse, previous research has shown that okay can be used both as a response token (e.g., for agreeing with the previous turn or for claiming a certain degree of understanding) and as a discourse marker (e.g., for closing conversational topics or sequences and/or indicating transitions). This contribution focuses on the use of okay as a response token and how it is connected with the speakers’ interactional state of knowledge (their understanding, their assumptions etc.). The analysis is based on video recorded everyday conversations in German and a sequential, micro-analytic approach (multimodal conversation analysis). The main function of conversational okay in the selected data set is related to indicating the acceptance of prior information. By okay, speakers however claim acceptance of a piece of information that they can’t verify or check. The analysis contrasts different sequences containing okay only with sequences in which change-of-state tokens such as ah and achso co-occur with okay. This illustrates that okay itself does not index prior information as new, and that it is not used for agreeing with or for confirming prior information. Instead it enables the speaker to adopt a kind of neutral, “non-agreeing” position towards a given piece of information.
Linguistic relativists have traditionally asked 'how language influences thought', but conversation analysts and anthropological linguists have moved the focus from thought to social action. We argue that 'social action' should in this context not become simply a new dependent variable, because the formulation 'does language influence action' suggests that social action would already be meaningfully constituted prior to its local (verbal and multi-modal) accomplishment. We draw on work by the gestalt psychologist Karl Duncker to show that close attention to action-in-a-situation helps us ground empirical work on cross-cultural diversity in an appreciation of the invariances that make culture-specific elements of practice meaningful.