Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (7)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Article (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (12)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (10)
- Polnisch (6)
- Deutsch (3)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (3)
- Englisch (2)
- Grammatik (2)
- Kontrastive Grammatik (2)
- Polish (2)
- Pronomen (2)
- Sprachstatistik (2)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (7)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
Publisher
In many European languages, propositional arguments (PAs) can be realized as different types of structures. Cross-linguistically, complex structures with PAs show a systematic correlation between the strength of the semantic bond and the syntactic union (cf. Givón 2001; Wurmbrand/Lohninger 2023). Also, different languages show similarities with respect to the (lexical) licensing of different PAs (cf. Noonan 1985; Givón 2001; Cristofaro 2003 on different predicate types). However, on a more fine-grained level, a variation across languages can be observed both with respect to the syntactic-semantic properties of PAs as well as to their licensing and usage. This presentation takes a multi-contrastive view of different types of PAs as syntactic subjects and objects by looking at five European languages: EN, DE, IT, PL and HU. Our goal is to identify the parameters of variation in the clausal domain with PAs and by this to contribute to a better understanding of the individual language systems on the one hand and the nature of the linguistic variation in the clausal domain on the other hand. Phenomena and Methodology: We investigate the following types of PAs: direct object (DO) clauses (1), prepositional object (PO) clauses (2), subject clauses (3), and nominalizations (4, 5). Additionally, we discuss clause union phenomena (6, 7). The analyzed parameters include among others finiteness, linear position of the PA, (non) presence of a correlative element, (non) presence of a complementizer, lexical-semantic class of the embedding verb. The phenomena are analyzed based on corpus data (using mono- and multilingual corpora), experimental data (acceptability judgement surveys) or introspective data.
This paper reports on recent developments within the European Reference Corpus EuReCo, an open initiative that aims at providing and using virtual and dynamically definable comparable corpora based on existing national, reference or other large corpora. Given the well-known shortcomings of other types of multilingual corpora such as parallel/translation corpora (shining-through effects, over-normalization, simplification, etc.) or web-based comparable corpora (covering only web material), EuReCo provides a unique linguistic resource offering new perspectives for fine-grained contrastive research on authentic cross-linguistic data, applications in translation studies and foreign language teaching and learning.
Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Motivation und Ziele hinter der Initiative Europäisches Referenzkorpus EuReCo. Ausgehend von den Desiderata, die sich aufgrund der Defizite verfügbarer Forschungsdaten wie monolinguale Korpora, Parallelkorpora und Vergleichskorpora für den Sprachvergleich ergeben, werden die bisherigen und die laufenden Arbeiten im Rahmen von EuReCo präsentiert und anhand vergleichender deutsch-rumänischer Kookkurrenzanalysen neue Perspektiven für kontrastive Korpuslinguistik, die die EuReCo-Initiative öffnet, skizziert.
Negation raising and mood. A corpus-based study of Polish sądzić ‘think’ and wierzyć ‘believe’
(2021)
The paper describes the distribution of two negation raising predicates in Polish: sądzić ‛think’ and wierzyć ‛believe’ in the National Corpus of Polish with a particular focus on their morphosyntax and the mood of their clausal complements. The aim was to examine whether there are any correlations between these two parameters, and to what extent negation raising with those verbs exhibits performative features (in terms of Prince, 1976). The results of the study support the performative approach to negation raising as per Prince (1976) only for cases with subjunctive complements. The corpus findings further imply that Polish negation raising predicates encode two different degrees of (un)certainty concerning the truth of the embedded proposition depending on the mood of their complements. Structures with indicative complements express weaker uncertainty than structures with subjunctive complements.
Validating the Performativity Hypothesis to Neg-Raising using corpus data: Evidence from Polish
(2021)
Dieser Beitrag präsentiert die neue multilinguale Ressource CoMParS (Collection of Multilingual Parallel Sequences). CoMParS versteht sich als eine funktional-semantisch orientierte Datenbank von Parallelsequenzen des Deutschen und anderer europäischer Sprachen, in der alle Daten neben den sprachspezifischen und universellen (im Sinne von Universal Dependencies) morphosyntaktischen Annotationen auch nach sprachübergreifenden funktional-semantischen Informationen auf der neudefinierten Annotationsebene Functional Domains annotiert und auf mehreren Ebenen (auch ebenenübergreifend) miteinander verlinkt sind. CoMParS wird in TEI P5 XML kodiert und sowohl als monolinguale wie auch als multilinguale Sprachressource modelliert.
Der Beitrag beschreibt die Motivation und Ziele des Europäischen Referenzkorpus EuReCo, einer offenen Initiative, die darauf abzielt, dynamisch definierbare virtuelle vergleichbare Korpora auf der Grundlage bestehender nationaler, Referenz- oder anderer großer Korpora bereitzustellen und zu verwenden. Angesichts der bekannten Unzulänglichkeiten anderer Arten mehrsprachiger Korpora wie Parallel- bzw. Übersetzungskorpora oder rein webbasierte vergleichbare Korpora, stellt das EuReCo eine einzigartige linguistische Ressource dar, die neue Perspektiven für germanistische und vergleichende wie angewandte Korpuslinguistik, insbesondere im europäischen Kontext, eröffnet.
In recent years, the availability of large annotated and searchable corpora, together with a new interest in the empirical foundation and validation of linguistic theory and description, has sparked a surge of novel and interesting work using corpus-based methods to study the grammar of natural languages. However, a look at relevant current research on the grammar of the Germanic, Romance, and Slavic languages reveals a variety of different theoretical approaches and empirical foci, which can be traced back to different philological and linguistic traditions. Still, this current state of affairs should not be seen as an obstacle but as an ideal basis for a fruitful exchange of ideas between different research paradigms.
CoMParS is a resource under construction in the context of the long-term project German Grammar in European Comparison (GDE) at the IDS Mannheim. The principal goal of GDE is to create a novel contrastive grammar of German against the background of other European languages. Alongside German, which is the central focus, the core languages for comparison are English, French, Hungarian and Polish, representing different typological classes. Unlike traditional contrastive grammars available for German, which usually cover language pairs and are based on formal grammatical categories, the new GDE grammar is developed in the spirit of functionalist typology. This implies that, instead of formal criteria, cognitively motivated functional domains in terms of Givón (1984) are used as tertia comparationis. The purpose of CoMParS is to document the empirical basis of the theoretical assumptions of GDE-V and to illustrate the otherwise rather abstract content of grammar books by as many as possible naturally occurring and adequately presented multilingual examples, including information on their use in specific contexts and registers. These examples come from existing parallel corpora, and our presentation will focus on the legal aspects and consequences of this choice of language data.