Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (3)
- Analytische Methode (1)
- CMC (1)
- Computerlinguistik (1)
- Computerunterstützte Kommunikation (1)
- DMC (1)
- Data Mining (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- German (1)
- German language (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
Publisher
Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, eine Software zu entwickeln, die quantitative und qualitative korpuslinguistische Methoden miteinander verbindet. Die Gesamtarbeit besteht daher aus zwei Teilen: einer Open-Source-Software und dem schriftlichen Teil. Der hier vorgelegte schriftliche Teil ist eine vollständige Dokumentation (Handbuch), ergänzt um eigene Publikationen, die im Rahmen des Dissertationsprojekts entstanden. In Kapitel 1.2 Korpora und beispielhafte Fragestellungen (S. 8) erfolgt eine Illustration beispielhafter Forschungsfragen anhand bereitgestellter und im Corpus- Explorer integrierter Korpora. Außerdem werden unter "?? ?? (S. ??)" Analysen mit verschiedensten prototypischen Forschungsfragen verknüpft, die sowohl quantitative als auch qualitative Perspektiven einnehmen. Der CorpusExplorer wurde besonders nutzerfreundlich gestaltet. Dabei ist die Zielgruppe der Software sehr breit defniert: Die Nutzung soll sowohl in der Forschung als auch in der Lehre möglich sein. Daher richtet sich der CorpusExplorer gleichermaßen an Studierende und Forschende mit ihren jeweils spezifschen Bedürfnissen. Die Nutzung für die Forschung zeigt sich (A) an den integrierten Artikeln sowie daran, dass (B) andere Forschende den CorpusExplorer bereits für ihre Arbeit aufgegriffen haben. Der Nutzen für die Lehre wurde mehrfach selbst erprobt und optimiert. Im Lehr-Einsatz ist es wichtig, dass Korpora mit wenigen Mausklicks analysefertig sind und verschiedene Analysen und Visualisierungen direkt genutzt werden können. Studierende erhalten so die Möglichkeit, eigenes Korpusmaterial direkt und selbst auszuwerten. Für Forschende bietet der CorpusExplorer ein sehr breites Funktionsspektrum. Im Vergleich zu anderer (öffentlich verfügbarer) korpuslinguistischer Software verfügt er aktuell über das wohl breiteste Anwendungsspektrum (51 Analysemodule (inkl. weiterentwickelter Verfahren), über 100 unterstützte Dateiformate für Im- und Export, unterschiedliche Tagger mit 69 unterstützten Sprachmodellen). Er kann so in bestehende Skripte, Toolchains und Workflows für sehr unterschiedliche Forschungsfragen integriert werden. Im CorpusExplorer wurden nicht nur bestehende Funktionen gebündelt, es wurden auch bisherige Verfahren weiterentwickelt. Hierzu zählen z. B. (1) die Entwicklung einer eigenen, an korpuslinguistischen Bedürfnissen ausgerichteten Datenbank- Struktur, (2) die Weiterentwicklung bzw. Optimierung des Verfahrens der Kookkurrenz- Analyse hin zu einer quantitativen Kookkurrenz-Analyse (keine Parameter wie Suchfenstergröße oder Suchwort nötig, Berechnung aller Kookkurrenzen zu allen Token in einem Korpus) und (3) die Verknüpfung unterschiedlicher Analyseressourcen, wie z. B. der NGram- und der Kookkurrenz-Analyse.
Manual development of deep linguistic resources is time-consuming and costly and therefore often described as a bottleneck for traditional rule-based NLP. In my PhD thesis I present a treebank-based method for the automatic acquisition of LFG resources for German. The method automatically creates deep and rich linguistic presentations from labelled data (treebanks) and can be applied to large data sets. My research is based on and substantially extends previous work on automatically acquiring wide-coverage, deep, constraint-based grammatical resources from the English Penn-II treebank (Cahill et al.,2002; Burke et al., 2004; Cahill, 2004). Best results for English show a dependency f-score of 82.73% (Cahill et al., 2008) against the PARC 700 dependency bank, outperforming the best hand-crafted grammar of Kaplan et al. (2004). Preliminary work has been carried out to test the approach on languages other than English, providing proof of concept for the applicability of the method (Cahill et al., 2003; Cahill, 2004; Cahill et al., 2005). While first results have been promising, a number of important research questions have been raised. The original approach presented first in Cahill et al. (2002) is strongly tailored to English and the datastructures provided by the Penn-II treebank (Marcus et al., 1993). English is configurational and rather poor in inflectional forms. German, by contrast, features semi-free word order and a much richer morphology. Furthermore, treebanks for German differ considerably from the Penn-II treebank as regards data structures and encoding schemes underlying the grammar acquisition task. In my thesis I examine the impact of language-specific properties of German as well as linguistically motivated treebank design decisions on PCFG parsing and LFG grammar acquisition. I present experiments investigating the influence of treebank design on PCFG parsing and show which type of representations are useful for the PCFG and LFG grammar acquisition tasks. Furthermore, I present a novel approach to cross-treebank comparison, measuring the effect of controlled error insertion on treebank trees and parser output from different treebanks. I complement the cross-treebank comparison by providing a human evaluation using TePaCoC, a new testsuite for testing parser performance on complex grammatical constructions. Manual evaluation on TePaCoC data provides new insights on the impact of flat vs. hierarchical annotation schemes on data-driven parsing. I present treebank-based LFG acquisition methodologies for two German treebanks. An extensive evaluation along different dimensions complements the investigation and provides valuable insights for the future development of treebanks.
This thesis is a corpus linguistic investigation of the language used by young German speakers online, examining lexical, morphological, orthographic, and syntactic features and changes in language use over time. The study analyses the language in the Nottinghamer Korpus deutscher YouTube‐Sprache ("Nottingham corpus of German YouTube language", or NottDeuYTSch corpus), one of the first large corpora of German‐language comments taken from the videosharing website YouTube, and built specifically for this project. The metadatarich corpus comprises c.33 million tokens from more than 3 million comments posted underneath videos uploaded by mainstream German‐language youthorientated YouTube channels from 2008‐2018.
The NottDeuYTSch corpus was created to enable corpus linguistic approaches to studying digital German youth language (Jugendsprache), having identified the need for more specialised web corpora (see Barbaresi 2019). The methodology for compiling the corpus is described in detail in the thesis to facilitate future construction of web corpora. The thesis is situated at the intersection of Computer‐Mediated Communication (CMC) and youth language, which have been important areas of sociolinguistic scholarship since the 1980s, and explores what we can learn from a corpus‐driven, longitudinal approach to (online) youth language. To do so, the thesis uses corpus linguistic methods to analyse three main areas:
1. Lexical trends and the morphology of polysemous lexical items. For this purpose, the analysis focuses on geil, one of the most iconic and productive words in youth language, and presents a longitudinal analysis, demonstrating that usage of geil has decreased, and identifies lexical items that have emerged as potential replacements. Additionally, geil is used to analyse innovative morphological productiveness, demonstrating how different senses of geil are used as a base lexeme or affixoid in compounding and derivation.
2. Syntactic developments. The novel grammaticalization of several subordinating conjunctions into both coordinating conjunctions and discourse markers is examined. The investigation is supported by statistical analyses that demonstrate an increase in the use of non‐standard syntax over the timeframe of the corpus and compares the results with other corpora of written language.
3. Orthography and the metacommunicative features of digital writing. This analysis identifies orthographic features and strategies in the corpus, e.g. the repetition of certain emoji, and develops a holistic framework to study metacommunicative functions, such as the communication of illocutionary force, information structure, or the expression of identities. The framework unifies previous research that had focused on individual features, integrating a wide range of metacommunicative strategies within a single, robust system of analysis.
By using qualitative and computational analytical frameworks within corpus linguistic methods, the thesis identifies emergent linguistic features in digital youth language in German and sheds further light on lexical and morphosyntactic changes and trends in the language of young people over the period 2008‐2018. The study has also further developed and augmented existing analytical frameworks to widen the scope of their application to orthographic features associated with digital writing.