Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (15) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (8)
- Conference Proceeding (4)
- Book (2)
- Article (1)
Language
- English (15) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (15)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (15)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (13)
- Annotation (3)
- Deutsch (3)
- Grammatik (3)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (2)
- CMC (2)
- Computerunterstützte Kommunikation (2)
- TEI (2)
- Technologie (2)
- Text Encoding Initiative (2)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (15)
This paper analyses reply relations in computer-mediated communication (CMC), which occur between post units in CMC interactions and which describe references between posts. We take a look at existing practices in the description and annotation of such relations in chat, wiki talk, and blog corpora. We distinguish technical reply structures, indentation structures, and interpretative reply relations, which include reply relations induced by linguistic markers. We sort out the different levels of description and annotation that are involved and propose a solution for their combined representation within the TEI annotation framework.
This presentation introduces a new collaborative project: the International Comparable Corpus (ICC) (https://korpus.cz/icc), to be compiled from European national, standard(ised) languages, using the protocols for text categories and their quantities of texts in the International Corpus of English (ICE).
New exceptions for Text and Data Mining and their possible impact on the CLARIN infrastructure
(2018)
The proposed paper discusses new exceptions for Text and Data Mining that have recently been adopted in some EU Member States, and probably will soon be adopted also at the EU level. These exceptions are of great significance for language scientists, as they exempt those who compile corpora from the obligation to obtain authorisation from rightholders. However, corpora compiled on the basis of such exceptions cannot be freely shared, which in a long run may have serious consequences for Open Science and the functioning of research infrastructure such as CLARIN ERIC.
This paper analyses reply relations in computer-mediated communication (CMC), which occur between post units in CMC interactions and which describe references between posts. We take a look at existing practices in the description and annotation of such relations in chat, wiki talk, and blog corpora. We distinguish technical reply structures, indentation structures, and interpretative reply relations, which include reply relations induced by linguistic markers. We sort out the different levels of description and annotation that are involved and propose a solution for their combined representation within the TEI annotation framework.
We present a testsuite for POS tagging German web data. Our testsuite provides the original raw text as well as the gold tokenisations and is annotated for parts-of-speech. The testsuite includes a new dataset for German tweets, with a current size of 3,940 tokens. To increase the size of the data, we harmonised the annotations in already existing web corpora, based on the Stuttgart-Tübingen Tag Set. The current version of the corpus has an overall size of 48,344 tokens of web data, around half of it from Twitter. We also present experiments, showing how different experimental setups (training set size, additional out-of-domain training data, self-training) influence the accuracy of the taggers. All resources and models will be made publicly available to the research community.
A syntax-based scheme for the annotation and segmentation of German spoken language interactions
(2018)
Unlike corpora of written language where segmentation can mainly be derived from orthographic punctuation marks, the basis for segmenting spoken language corpora is not predetermined by the primary data, but rather has to be established by the corpus compilers. This impedes consistent querying and visualization of such data. Several ways of segmenting have been proposed,
some of which are based on syntax. In this study, we developed and evaluated annotation and segmentation guidelines in reference to the topological field model for German. We can show that these guidelines are used consistently across annotators. We also investigated the influence of various interactional settings with a rather simple measure, the word-count per segment and unit-type. We observed that the word count and the distribution of each unit type differ in varying interactional settings and that our developed segmentation and annotation guidelines are used consistently across annotators. In conclusion, our syntax-based segmentations reflect interactional properties that are intrinsic to the social interactions that participants are involved in. This can be used for further analysis of social interaction and opens the possibility for automatic segmentation of transcripts.
The paper describes preliminary studies regarding the usage of Example-Based Querying for specialist corpora. We outline an infrastructure for its application within the linguistic domain. Example-Based Querying deals with retrieval situations where users would like to explore large collections of specialist texts semantically, but are unable to explicitly name the linguistic phenomenon they look for. As a way out, the proposed framework allows them to input prototypical everyday language examples or cases of doubt, which are automatically processed by CRF and linked to appropriate linguistic texts in the corpus.
Contents:
1. Christoph Kuras, Thomas Eckart, Uwe Quasthoff and Dirk Goldhahn: Automation, management and improvement of text corpus production, S. 1
2. Thomas Krause, Ulf Leser, Anke Lüdeling and Stephan Druskat: Designing a re-usable and embeddable corpus search library, S. 6
3. Radoslav Rábara, Pavel Rychlý and Ondřej Herman: Distributed corpus search, S. 10
4. Adrien Barbaresi and Antonio Ruiz Tinoco: Using elasticsearch for linguistic analysis of tweets in time and space, S. 14
5. Marc Kupietz, Nils Diewald and Peter Fankhauser: How to Get the Computation Near the Data: Improving data accessibility to, and reusability of analysis functions in corpus query platforms, S. 20
6. Roman Schneider: Example-based querying for specialist corpora, S. 26
7. Paul Rayson: Increasing interoperability for embedding corpus annotation pipelines in Wmatrix and other corpus retrieval tools, S. 33