Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Book (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (7)
- Deutsch (6)
- Annotation (3)
- Redeerwähnung (2)
- Sprachstatistik (2)
- Wortverbindung (2)
- annotation (2)
- corpus (2)
- Automatische Sprachanalyse (1)
- Datenanalyse (1)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (5)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (3)
Publisher
Projektvorstellung – Redewiedergabe. Eine literatur- und sprachwissenschaftliche Korpusanalyse
(2018)
Das laufende DFG-Projekt „Redewiedergabe“ stellt einen Anwendungsfall quantitativer Sprach-und Literaturwissenschaft dar und beschäftigt sich mit dem Phänomen „Redewiedergabe“ auf der Grundlage großer Datenmengen. Zu diesem Zweck wird zum einen ein Korpus manuell mit Redewiedergabeformen annotiert, zum anderen werden Verfahren zur automatischen Erkennung des Phänomens entwickelt. Ziel ist es, Forschungsfragen nach der Entwicklung von Redewiedergabe vor allem im 19. Jahrhundert zu beantworten.
We present recognizers for four very different types of speech, thought and writing representation (STWR) for German texts. The implementation is based on deep learning with two different customized contextual embeddings, namely FLAIR embeddings and BERT embeddings. This paper gives an evaluation of our recognizers with a particular focus on the differences in performance we observed between those two embeddings. FLAIR performed best for direct STWR (F1=0.85), BERT for indirect (F1=0.76) and free indirect (F1=0.59) STWR. For reported STWR, the comparison was inconclusive, but BERT gave the best average results and best individual model (F1=0.60). Our best recognizers, our customized language embeddings and most of our test and training data are freely available and can be found via www.redewiedergabe.de or at github.com/redewiedergabe.
The paper explores factors that influence the distribution of constituent words of compounds over the head and modifier position. The empirical basis for the study is a large database of German compounds, annotated with respect to the morphological structure of the compound and the semantic category of the constituents. The study shows that the polysemy of the constituent word, its constituent family size, and its semantic category account for tendencies of the constituent word to occur in either modifier or head position. Furthermore, the paper explores the degree to which the semantic category combination of head and modifier word, e.g., x=substance and y=artifact, indicates the semantic relation between the constituents, e.g., y_consists_of_x.
Corpus REDEWIEDERGABE
(2020)
This article presents the corpus REDEWIEDERGABE, a German-language historical corpus with detailed annotations for speech, thought and writing representation (ST&WR). With approximately 490,000 tokens, it is the largest resource of its kind. It can be used to answer literary and linguistic research questions and serve as training material for machine learning. This paper describes the composition of the corpus and the annotation structure, discusses some methodological decisions and gives basic statistics about the forms of ST&WR found in this corpus.
This contribution presents a quantitative approach to speech, thought and writing representation (ST&WR) and steps towards its automatic detection. Automatic detection is necessary for studying ST&WR in a large number of texts and thus identifying developments in form and usage over time and in different types of texts. The contribution summarizes results of a pilot study: First, it describes the manual annotation of a corpus of short narrative texts in relation to linguistic descriptions of ST&WR. Then, two different techniques of automatic detection – a rule-based and a machine learning approach – are described and compared. Evaluation of the results shows success with automatic detection, especially for direct and indirect ST&WR.
We present a corpus-driven approach to the study of multi-word expressions, which constitute a significant part of. As a data basis, we use collocation profiles computed from DeReKo (Deutsches Referenzkorpus), the largest available collection of written German which has approximately two billion word tokens and is located at the Institute for the German Language (IDS). We employ a strongly usage-based approach to multi-word expressions, which we think of as conventionalised patterns in language use that manifest themselves in recurrent syntagmatic patterns of words. They are defined by their distinct function in language. To find multi-word expressions, we allow ourselves to be guided by corpus data and statistical evidence as much as possible, making interpretative steps carefully and in a monitored fashion. We develop a procedure of interpretation that leads us from the evidence of collocation profiles to a collection of recurrent word patterns and finally to multi-word expressions. When building up a collection of multi-word expressions in this fashion, it becomes clear that the expressions can be defined on different levels of generalisation and are interrelated in various ways. This will be reflected in the documentation and presentation of the findings. We are planning to add annotation in a way that allows grouping the multi-word expressions according to different features and to add links between them to reflect their relationships, thus constructing a network of multi-word expressions.
Bericht von der Dritten Internationalen Konferenz „Grammatik und Korpora“, Mannheim, 22. - 24.9.2009
(2009)
Die im Folgenden dargestellte korpusgesteuerte Methode "UWV-Analysemodell" wurde auf der Basis der Forschungen zu usuellen Wortverbindungen (UWV) (vgl. Steyer 2000, 2003, 2004, Steyer/Lauer 2007, Brunner/Steyer 2007, Steyer 2008, Steyer demn.) und zahlreicher, exhaustiver Analysen in den letzten Jahren entwickelt. Ziel war ein empirisches Vorgehensmodell, das es ermöglicht, die Differenziertheit und Vernetztheit von Wortverbindungen auf verschiedenen Abstraktionsebenen ausgehend von Kookkurrenzdaten angemessen darzustellen. Daher ging es in dieser Arbeitsphase nicht darum, usuelle Wortverbindungen des Deutschen möglichst umfassend und in großer Menge zu inventarisieren, sondern die "innere Natur" von Wortverbindungen zwischen Varianz und Invarianz mit unterschiedlichen Graden an lexikalischer Spezifiziertheit sowie ihre wechselseitigen Verbindungen im Detail zu erfassen und zu beschreiben.