Korpuslinguistik
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (33)
- Article (14)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Part of Periodical (2)
- Review (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (58)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (58) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (50)
- Deutsch (13)
- Corpus linguistics (11)
- corpus linguistics (10)
- Corpus technology (9)
- Annotation (7)
- Texttechnologie (7)
- Large corpora (6)
- Corpus annotation (5)
- Datenbanksystem (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (52)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (4)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (58) (remove)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (16)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (7)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie und Computerlinguistik (3)
- de Gruyter (3)
- IDS-Verlag (2)
- Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Darmstadt (2)
- Academic Publishing Division of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Ljubljana (1)
- Association for Computational Linguistics ( ACL ); Curran Associates, Inc. (1)
- Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities, Austrian Academy of Sciences (1)
- Bern Open Publishing (1)
Corpus-based identification and disambiguation of reading indicators for German nominalizations
(2010)
Corpus data is often structurally and lexically ambiguous; corpus extraction methodologies thus must be made aware of ambiguities. Therefore, given an extraction task, all relevant ambiguities must be identified. To resolve these ambiguities, contextual data responsible for one or another reading is to be considered. In the context of our present work, German -ung-nominalizations and their sortal readings are under examination. A number of these nominalizations may be read as an event or a result, depending on the semantic group they belong to. Here, we concentrate on nominalizations of verbs of saying (henceforth: "verba dicendi"), identify their context partners and their influence on the sortal reading of the nominalizations in question. We present a tool which calculates the sortal reading of such nominalizations and thus may improve not only corpus extraction, but also e.g. machine translation. Lastly, we describe successful attempts to identify the correct sortal reading, conclusions and future work.
Zum Verschmelzungsverhalten von definitem Artikel und Präposition in der Schriftsprache des Deutschen liegen bereits diverse Erkenntnisse vor, wohingegen die Kenntnislage für die gesprochene Sprache noch unzureichend ist. Die vorliegende Untersuchung widmet sich diesem Desiderat und analysiert Präposition-Artikel-Kombinationen anhand von Daten aus FOLK, um die linguistische Beschreibung dieser Struktur voranzutreiben. In der durchgeführten Korpusanalyse werden die Auftretenshäufigkeiten synthetischer und analytischer Präposition-Artikel-Kombinationen verglichen und Gebrauchsbesonderheiten auf syntaktisch-lexikalischer und pragmatischer Ebene herausgearbeitet.
Das Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus für GesprochenesDeutsch (FOLK) ist ein Korpus des gesprochenen Deutsch in natürlichen sozialen Interaktionen, das seit 2008 in der Abteilung Pragmatik am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim aufgebaut wird. FOLK besteht aus Audio- und Videoaufzeichnungen natürlicher Gespräche aus verschiedensten gesellschaftlichen Bereichen (private, institutionelle und öffentliche Interaktionsdomäne), die durch Transkription, weitere Annotationen und Metadaten-Dokumentation für korpusgestützte Analysen erschlossen und zur wissenschaftlichen Nutzung bereitgestellt werden. FOLK wird auf vielfältige Weise für Untersuchungen zum gesprochenen Deutsch genutzt, insbesondere in der Gesprächsforschung, der Korpuslinguistik und anwendungsorientierten Zweigen der Linguistik.
So far, Sepedi negations have been considered more from the point of view of lexicographical treatment. Theoretical works on Sepedi have been used for this purpose, setting as an objective a neat description of these negations in a (paper) dictionary. This paper is from a different perspective: instead of theoretical works, corpus linguistic methods are used: (1) a Sepedi corpus is examined on the basis of existing descriptions of the occurrences of a relevant verb, looking at its negated forms from a purely prescriptive point of view; (2) a "corpus-driven" strategy is employed, looking only for sequences of negation particles (or morphemes) in order to list occurring constructions, without taking into account the verbs occurring in them, apart from their endings. The approach in (2) is only intended to show a possible methodology to extend existing theories on occurring negations. We would also like to try to help lexicographers to establish a frequency-based order of entries of possible negation forms in their dictionaries by showing them the number of respective occurrences. As with all corpus linguistic work, however, we must regard corpus evidence not as representative, but as tendencies of language use that can be detected and described. This is especially true for Sepedi, for which only few and small corpora exist. This paper also describes the resources and tools used to create the necessary corpus and also how it was annotated with part of speech and lemmas. Exploring the quality of available Sepedi part-of-speech taggers concerning verbs, negation morphemes and subject concords may be a positive side result.
This paper describes the application of probabilistic part of speech taggers to the Dzongkha language. A tag set containing 66 tags is designed, which is based on the Penn Treebank. A training corpus of 40,247 tokens is utilized to train the model. Using the lexicon extracted from the training corpus and lexicon from the available word list, we used two statistical taggers for comparison reasons. The best result achieved was 93.1% accuracy in a 10-fold cross validation on the training set. The winning tagger was thereafter applied to annotate a 570,247 token corpus.
In this article, we examine the current situation of data dissemination and provision for CMC corpora. By that we aim to give a guiding grid for future projects that will improve the transparency and replicability of research results as well as the reusability of the created resources. Based on the FAIR guiding principles for research data management, we evaluate the 20 European CMC corpora listed in the CLARIN CMC Resource family, individuate successful strategies among the existing corpora and establish best practices for future projects. We give an overview of existing approaches to data referencing, dissemination and provision in European CMC corpora, and discuss the methods, formats and strategies used. Furthermore, we discuss the need for community standards and offer recommendations for best practices when creating a new CMC corpus.
This paper describes a method for extracting collocation data from text corpora based on a formal definition of syntactic structures, which takes into account not only the POS-tagging level of annotation but also syntactic parsing (syntactic treebank model) and introduces the possibility of controlling the canonical form of extracted collocations based on statistical data on forms with different properties in the corpus. Specifically, we describe the results of extraction from the syntactically tagged Gigafida 2.1 corpus. Using the new method, 4,002,918 collocation candidates in 81 syntactic structures were extracted. We evaluate the extracted data sample in more detail, mainly in relation to properties that affect the extraction of canonical forms: definiteness in adjectival collocations, grammatical number in noun collocations, comparison in adjectival and adverbial collocations, and letter case (uppercase and lowercase) in canonical forms. The conclusion highlights the potential of the methodology used for the grammatical description of collocation and phrasal syntax and the possibilities for improving the model in the process of compilation of a digital dictionary database for Slovene.
This paper describes a method for automatic identification of sentences in the Gigafida corpus containing multi-word expressions (MWEs) from the list of 5,242 phraseological units, which was developed on the basis of several existing open-access lexical resources for Slovene. The method is based on a definition of MWEs, which includes information on two levels of corpus annotation: syntax (dependency parsing) and morphology (POS tagging), together with some additional statistical parameters. The resulting lexicon contains 12,358 sentences containing MWEs extracted from the corpus. The extracted sentences were analysed from the lexicographic point of view with the aim of establishing canonical forms of MWEs and semantic relations between them in terms of variation, synonymy, and antonymy.
Vergleichbare Korpora für multilinguale kontrastive Studien. Herausforderungen und Desiderata
(2022)
This contribution aims to show the necessity of working in the development of multilingual corpora and appropriate tools for multilingual contrastive studies. We take the corpus of the lexicographical project COMBIDIGILEX as example to show, how difficultit is to build a suitable data basis to study and compare linguistic phenomena in German, Spanish and Portuguese. Despite the availability of big reference corpora for the three languages (at least for written language), it is not able to obtain a comparable data basis from, because the mentioned corpora are created according to different requirements and they are also powered by disparate information systems and analyse tools. To break the status quo, we plead for increasing research infrastructures by means of compatible language technology and sharing data.