Gesprächsforschung / Gesprochene Sprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (262)
- Article (214)
- Part of Periodical (45)
- Book (33)
- Conference Proceeding (16)
- Working Paper (16)
- Review (10)
- Contribution to a Periodical (8)
- Other (6)
- Doctoral Thesis (5)
Keywords
- Deutsch (320)
- Konversationsanalyse (197)
- Gesprochene Sprache (148)
- Interaktion (121)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (66)
- Gesprächsanalyse (56)
- Kommunikation (55)
- Gespräch (32)
- conversation analysis (27)
- Kolloquium (25)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (236)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (73)
- Postprint (33)
- Erstveröffentlichung (2)
- Ahead of Print (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (96)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (68)
- Schwann (37)
- Narr (35)
- de Gruyter (35)
- Stauffenburg (16)
- Lang (15)
- Narr Francke Attempto (15)
- Benjamins (13)
- Westdeutscher Verlag (11)
Das Dialogstrukturenkorpus
(1984)
This article is concerned with the use of speech variation in a classroom in south-west Germany. It shows how a teacher uses dialect-standard variation as a resource for carrying out different tasks. An analysis of the variational practices of the teacher reveals two different code-alternating procedures with different functional scopes. On the one hand, the teacher uses code-shifting along a continuum of standard forms, especially to draw attention to relevant aspects of the instructional activities, and to guide participation in the unfolding discourse. On the other hand, she uses the context-cueing function of code-switching between standard and dialect, especially to locally manage the key of interaction (interaction modalities). It is shown that, for the teacher analysed, switching to dialect is a methodological resource which matches the intricate pedagogical tasks involved in the evaluation moves which follow pupils' 'troublesome' answers.
In her overview, Margret Selting makes the case for the claim that dealing with authentic conversation necessarily lies at the heart of an interactionallinguistic approach to prosody (see Selting this volume, Section 3.3). However, collecting and transcribing corpora of authentic interaction is a time-consuming enterprise. This fact often severely restricts what the individual researcher is able to do in terms of analysis within the scope of his or her resources. Still, for dealing with many of the desiderata Margret Selting points out in Section 5 of her extensive overview, the use of larger corpora seems to be required. In this commenting paper, I want to argue that future progress in research on prosody in interaction will essentially rest on the availability and use of large public corpora. After reviewing arguments for and against the use of public corpora, I will discuss some upshots regarding corpus design and issues of transcription of public corpora.