Gesprächsforschung / Gesprochene Sprache
Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (262) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (262)
Keywords
- Deutsch (139)
- Konversationsanalyse (78)
- Gesprochene Sprache (64)
- Interaktion (58)
- Gesprächsanalyse (24)
- Kommunikation (24)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (18)
- Gespräch (14)
- Gesprochenes Deutsch (12)
- Interaktionsanalyse (12)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (113)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (42)
- Postprint (19)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (142)
- Peer-Review (12)
- Verlags-Lektorat (2)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Schwann (35)
- Narr (28)
- de Gruyter (21)
- Stauffenburg (16)
- Lang (15)
- Narr Francke Attempto (15)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (14)
- Niemeyer (10)
- Westdeutscher Verlag (10)
- Benjamins (9)
This presentation deals with collaborative turn-sequences (Lerner 2004), a syntactically coherent unit of talk that is jointly formulated by at least two speakers, in Czech and German everyday conversations. Based on conversation analysis (e.g., Schegloff 2007) and a multimodal approach to social interaction (e.g., Deppermann/Streeck 2018), we aim at comparing recurrent patterns and action types within co-constructional sequences in both languages. The practice of co-constructing turns-at-talk has been described for typologically different languages, especially for English (e.g., Lerner 1996, 2004), but also for languages such as Japanese (Hayashi 2003) or Finnish (Helasvuo 2004). For German, various forms and functions of co-constructions have already been investigated (e.g., Brenning 2015); for Czech, a detailed, interactionally based description is still pending (but see some initial observations in, e.g., Hoffmannová/Homoláč/Mrázková (eds.) 2019). Although the existence of co-constructions in different languages points to a cross-linguistic conversational practice, few explicitly comparative studies exist (see, e.g., Lerner/Takagi 1999, for English and Japanese). The language pair Czech-German has mainly been studied with respect to language contact and without specifically considering spoken language or complex conversational sequences (e.g., Nekula/Šichová/Valdrová 2013). Therefore, our second aim is to sketch out a first comparison of co-constructional sequences in German and Czech, thereby contributing to the growing field of comparative and cross-linguistic studies within conversation analysis (e.g., Betz et al. (eds.) 2021; Dingemanse/Enfield 2015; Sidnell (ed.) 2009). More specifically, we will present three main sequential patterns of co-constructional sequences, focusing on the type of action a second speaker carries out by completing a first speaker’s possibly incomplete turn-at-talk, and on how the initial speaker then responds to
this suggested completion (Lerner 2004). Excerpts from video recordings of Czech and German ordinary conversations will illustrate these recurrent co-constructional sequence types, i.e., offering help during word searches (see example 1 above), displaying understanding, or claiming independent knowledge. The third objective of this paper is to underline the participants’ orientation to similar interactional problems, solved by specific syntactic and/or lexical formats in Czech and German. Considering the more recent focus on the embodied dimension of co-constructional practices (e.g., Dressel 2020), we will also investigate the multimodal formatting of a started utterance as more or less “permeable” (Lerner 1996) for co-participant completion, the participants’ mutual embodied orientation, and possible embodied responses to others’ turn-completions (such as head nods or eyebrow flashes, cf. De Stefani 2021). More generally, this contribution reflects on the possibilities and challenges of a cross-linguistic comparison of complex multimodal sequences.
‘Can’ and ‘must’-type modal verbs in the direct sanctioning of misconduct across European languages
(2023)
Deontic meanings of obligation and permissibility have mostly been studied in relation to modal verbs, even though researchers are aware that such meanings can be conveyed in other ways (consider, for example, the contributions to Nuyts/van der Auwera (eds.) 2016). This presentation reports on an ongoing project that examines deontic meaning but takes as its starting point not a type of linguistic structure but a particular kind of social moment that presumably attracts deontic talk: The management of potentially ‚unacceptable‘ or untoward actions (taking the last bread roll at breakfast, making a disallowed move during a board game, etc.). Data come from a multi-language parallel video corpus of everyday social interaction in English, German, Italian, and Polish. Here, we focus on moments in which one person sanctions another’s behavior as unacceptable. Using interactional-linguistic methods (Couper-Kuhlen/Selting 2018), we examine similarities and differences across these four languages in the use of modal verbs as part of such sanctioning attempts. First results suggest that modal verbs are not as common in the sanctioning of misconduct as one might expect. Across the four languages, only between 10%–20% of relevant sequences involve a modal verb. Most of the time, in this context, speakers achieve deontic meaning in other ways (e.g., infinitives such as German nicht so schmatzen, ‚no smacking‘). This raises the question what exactly modal verbs, on those relatively rare occasions when they are used, contribute to the accomplishment of deontic meaning. The reported study pursues this question in two ways: 1) By considering similarities across languages in the ways that modal verbs interact with other (verbal) means in the sanctioning of misconduct.; 2) By considering differences across languages in the use of modal verbs. Here, we find that the relevant modal verbs are used similarly in some activity contexts (enforcing rules during board games), but less so in other activity contexts (mundane situations with no codified rules). In sum, the presented study adds to cross-linguistically grounded knowledge about deontic meaning and its relationships to linguistics structures.
It is a ubiquitous phenomenon of everyday interaction that participants confront their co-participants for behaviour that they assess as undesirable or in some other way untoward. In a set of video data of informal interaction from the PECII corpus (Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction), cases of such sanctions have been collected in English, German, Italian and Polish data. This study presents work in progress and focuses on interrogatively formatted sanctions, in particular on non-polar interrogatives. It has already been shown that interrogatives can do much more than ask questions (Huddleston 1994). They can also function as directives (Lindström et al. 2017) or, more specifically, as requests (Curl/Drew 2008), as invitations (Margutti/Galatolo 2018) or reproaches (Klattenberg 2021), among others. What makes them interesting for cross-linguistic comparison is that the four languages that are considered provide different morphological and (morpho-)syntactical ressources for the realization of interrogative phrases. For example, German provides the option of building in the modal particle denn that reveals a previous lack of clarity and obliges the co-participant(s) to deliver the missing information (Deppermann 2009). Of course, the other three languages have modal particles, too (e.g. allora in Italian or though in English), but they do not seem to convey the same semantic and interactional qualities as denn. From an interactional point of view, one could think that interrogatives are a typical and effective way of solliciting accounts, since formally they open up a conditionally relevant space for an answer or a
reaction. But as the data shows, this does not guarantee that they are actually responded to. Another relevant aspect in the context of sanctions is that the interrogative format seems to carry a certain ‚openness‘ that might be seen as a mitigating effect and thus provides an interesting point of comparison with other mitigating devices. This study uses the methods of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics. It is based on a collection of 148 interrogative sanctions (out of which 84 are non-polar interrogatives) covering the four languages. I draw on coded data from roughly 1000 cases to get a first overall idea of how the interrogative format might differ from other formats, and how it might interrelate with specific features – for example, if subsequently an account is delivered. Going more into depth, the interrogative sanctions will then be analyzed with respect to their formal design (e.g. polar questions vs. content questions vs. tag questions, Rossano 2010; Hayano 2013) and to their pragmatic implications. I also analyze reactions to such sanctions – both formally (cf. Enfield et al. 2019, 279) and, again, from an interactional perspective (e.g. acceptance/compliance vs. challenging/defiance; Kent 2012; Cekaite 2020). A more detailed zooming in on the sequential unfolding of some particularly interesting
instances of sanctioning interrogatives will make the picture complete.
The ubiquity of smartphones has been recognised within conversation analysis as having an impact on conversational structures and on the participants’ interactional involvement. However, most of the previous studies have relied exclusively on video recordings of overall encounters and have not systematically considered what is taking place on the device. Due to the personal nature of smartphones and their small displays, onscreen activities are of limited visibility and are thus potentially opaque for both the co-present participants (“participant opacity”) and the researchers (“analytical opacity”). While opacity can be an inherent feature of smartphones in general, analytical opacity might not be desirable for research purposes. This chapter discusses how a recording set-up consisting of static cameras, wearable cameras and dynamic screen captures allowed us to address the analytical opacity of mobile devices. Excerpts from multi-source video data of everyday encounters will illustrate how the combination of multiple perspectives can increase the visibility of interactional phenomena, reveal new analytical objects and improve analytical granularity. More specifically, these examples will emphasise the analytical advantages and challenges of a combined recording set-up with regard to smartphone use as multiactivity, the role of the affordances of the mobile device, and the prototypicality and “naturalness” of the recorded practices.
In this presentation I show first results from an ongoing study about syntactic complexity of sanctioning turns in spoken language. This study is part of a larger project on sanctioning of misconduct in social interaction in different European languages (English, German, Italian and Polish). For the study I use video recordings of different everyday settings (family breakfasts, board game interactions and car rides) with three or four participants. These data come from the Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction (Kornfeld/Küttner/Zinken 2023; Küttner et al. submitted). I focus on sanctioning turns with more than one turn-constructional unit (see among others for TCUs: Sacks/Schegloff/Jefferson 1974; Clayman 2013). The study asks how often TCUs are linked to each other in the different languages, for what function, and how language diversity enters into this. Note that complex sanctioning turns do not always come as complex sentences.
Argumentation nicht erwünscht – Einstellungen zum Argumentativen im Japanischen und Deutschen
(2017)
Dieser Beitrag behandelt Erscheinungsweisen des Argumentativen im Japanischen und Deutschen. Diesbezügliche Unterschiede und ihre Hintergründe werden je nach alltäglichen und institutionalisierten Situationen dargestellt. Im ersten teil werden Relationen von schwer bemerkbaren Normalitäten verbaler Interaktion und Kooperationsstilen dargestellt. Unterschiedliche Orientierung an Gleichheit bzw. Andersartigkeit entspricht jeweils positiver oder negativer Einstellung zur Argumentation. Die Grundzüge argumentativer Handlungen im Japanischen und Deutschen, die sich vorwiegend in Alltagsinteraktionen manifestieren, werden skizziert. Anhand deutschsprachiger Beispiele wird gezeigt, wie in (halb-)öffentlichen Diskursen eine positive Einstellung zur Argumentation reflexiv ausgedrückt wird. Krasse Differenzen zum Japanischen sind zu erwarten. Im zweiten Teil werden zuerst Hinweise auf historische Prozesse der Modernisierung Japans als Hintergrund der negativen Einstellung zur Argumentation gegeben. Anschließend werden in Anlehnung an kritische Untersuchungen öffentlicher Diskurse Beobachtungen über die gegenwärtige Situation vorgestellt. Der dritte Teil behandelt zur Erörterung der oben erwähnten Umstände sprachlich- interaktionale Eigenschaften des stigmatisierenden Worts hühyö ('Gerücht'). Dabei geht es um eine Herausarbeitung von Strategien zum Vorbeugen und Außerkraftsetzen der prototypischen Form der Argumentation. Zum Schluss wird nach der Zusammenfassung der Ausführungen auf den Sinn der Argumentation als allgemeines Werkzeug der Konfliktbewältigung hingewiesen.
Fast 20 Jahre sind vergangen, seit ich für meine Dissertation Untersuchungen über Ein- und Verkaufsgespräche von Deutschen und Japanern in Deutschland und Japan durchführte. Dort wurden konkrete verbale und nonverbale Handlungen zwischen deutschen bzw. japanischen Verkäufern und deutschen bzw. japanischen Kunden beim Ein- und Verkaufen untersucht. Untersuchungsorte waren dabei Düsseldorf, wo die meisten Japaner in Deutschland ansässig sind, Tokio, wo die meisten Deutschen in Japan ansässig sind, Heidelberg, das von vielen japanischen Touristen besucht wird, und Nagano, wo deutsche Touristen damals bei der Olympiade waren. Anlässlich dieser Festschrift für meinen Doktorvater Prof. Dr. Gerhard Stickel versuchte ich, eine kleine Untersuchung durchzuführen, um sprachliche Veränderungen im Verlauf der Zeit und der sozialen Veränderung zu beobachten. In dieser Abhandlung werden die Veränderung der Gesellschaft und ihr Einfluss auf die Sprache behandelt. Im folgenden zweiten Abschnitt werden soziale Veränderungen in Düsseldorf thematisiert, im dritten Abschnitt werden die Ergebnisse der zwei Befragungen analysiert und zum Schluss wird eine Möglichkeit der Sprachverbreitung im Zusammenhang mit der heutigen Gesellschaft dargestellt.
Im Zentrum der Betrachtungen stehen Sprachkontaktsituationen sowie Sprachkontaktphänomene der Kaukasiendeutschen. Sie sind Nachfahren deutschstämmiger Einwohner des Russischen Reichs und der Sowjetunion, die ab Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts in mehreren Phasen in Gebiete Transkaukasiens ausgewandert sind. Bei der untersuchten Gruppe handelt es sich um diejenigen, die aufgrund von interethnischen Ehen von den Deportationen 1941 aus den deutschen Siedlungsgebieten ausgenommen waren und bis heute im Südkaukasus leben. Mithilfe soziolinguistischer Methoden wurden von der Autorin erstmalig 2017 formelle, leitfadengestützte Interviews im Südkaukasus mit der noch lebenden Erlebnisgeneration sowie einer Nachkommengeneration aufgenommen, transkribiert und ausgewertet. Im Beitrag werden Sprachkontaktkonstellationen deutscher Varietäten (Schwäbisch sowie standardnahes Deutsch) mit dem Russischen (und Georgischen) sowie Sprachkontaktphänomene vorgestellt.
In this chapter, we will investigate smartphone-based showing sequences in everyday social encounters, that is, moments in which a personal mobile device is used for presenting (audio-)visual content to co-present participants. Despite a growing interest in object-centred sequences and mundane technology use, detailed accounts of the sequential, multimodal, and material dimensions of showing sequences are lacking. Based on video data of social interactions in different languages and on the framework of multimodal interaction analysis, this chapter will explore the link between mobile device use and social practices. We will analyse how smartphone showers and their recipients coordinate the manipulation of a technological object with multiple courses of action, and reflect upon the fundamental complexity of this by-now routine joint activity.
Metadaten zu Gesprächen und den beteiligten Sprecher/-innen enthalten Informationen, die für die Beschreibung, Erschließung und Analyse von Korpora wichtig sind. Bisher werden sie jedoch in der Konversationsanalyse und der Interaktionalen Linguistik so gut wie nicht genutzt. Dieser Beitrag zeigt exemplarisch, wie Metadaten des Gesprächskorpus „Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch“ (FOLK) im Rahmen einer interaktionslinguistischen Untersuchung verwendet werden können, um Regularitäten der Verwendung einer untersuchten Gesprächspraktik zu identifizieren und ihren Zusammenhang mit den Eigenschaften von Aktivitäten und Sprecherrollen zu klären. In allgemeinerer Perspektive diskutiert der Beitrag, wie und an welchen Stellen einer interaktionslinguistischen Untersuchung Metadaten von Nutzen sein können und wie ihr Stellenwert im Rahmen dieser Methodologie kritisch reflektiert werden muss.