Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (2965) (remove)
Language
Keywords
- Deutsch (1456)
- Rezension (198)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (189)
- Konversationsanalyse (178)
- Sprachgebrauch (130)
- Wörterbuch (130)
- Interaktion (126)
- Gesprochene Sprache (98)
- Kommunikation (95)
- Rechtschreibung (95)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (1170)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (428)
- Postprint (166)
- Ahead of Print (7)
- Preprint (3)
- Hybrides Open Access (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (919)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (732)
- Peer-review (34)
- Verlags-Lektorat (14)
- Peer-Revied (12)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (3)
- Peer-reviewed (2)
- (Verlag)-Lektorat (1)
- Peer review (1)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (456)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (182)
- de Gruyter (159)
- Erich Schmidt (78)
- De Gruyter (63)
- Schmidt (63)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (52)
- Akademie-Verlag (36)
- Elsevier (33)
- Erich Schmidt Verlag (33)
What is the subject of German linguistics? This seemingly simple question has no obvious answer. In the ZGL’s first issue, the editors required contributions to cover the whole of the German language and to be theoretically sound but application-orientated, whereas the current ZGL-homepage defines the German language of present and history in all its differentiations as its subject matter.
Looking through the fifty volumes of ZGL, three relationships can be identified as presumably enlightening the role of language, in particular the German language: language and mind; language and language use; language and culture. Though of a different systematic type, language and data should be added as an increasingly important pairing for conceptualizing language. On this basis, I also discuss the position of linguistic studies of the German language, mirrored in the ZGL-volumes, between social, cultural and natural sciences, as well as the corresponding epistemic approaches – like explaining vs. understanding.
Der Beitrag diskutiert - aus der Perspektive sozialer Welten - die Frage des Zusammenhangs zwischen den Deutungsmustern und Wissensbestanden, deren sich Migranten bedienen, und den Formen ihrer sozialen Teilhabe. Die empirische Analyse stützt sich auf „intra-ethnische“ Interaktionsprozesse in der sozialen Welt eines „türkischen“ Fußballvereins in Mannheim. Es wird gezeigt, dass sich im untersuchten Fall ethnische Selbstorganisation und Integration auf spezifische Weise paaren. Zu den Strukturmerkmalen dieser lokalen sozialen Welt zählen insbesondere ihre Einbettung in eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Kontexte und ihre interne Differenzierung. Des Weiteren ist die alltagspragmatische Verwendung "türkischer" Kulturmuster und der universalistische Charakter der symbolischen Legitimationen in der Alltagsphilosophie der Vereinsangehörigen zu nennen. Schließlich ist die Dominanz von Handlungsanforderungen und Deutungen aus der Fußballwelt gegenüber solchen aus dem „ethnischen“ Milieu sowie die Infragestellung der Kategorien „deutsch“ und „türkisch“ kennzeichnend für die untersuchte Sozialwelt.
A constructicon, i.e., a structured inventory of constructions, essentially aims at documenting functions of lexical and grammatical constructions. Among other parameters, so-called constructional collo-profiles, as introduced by Herbst (2018, 2020), are conclusive for determining constructional meanings. They provide information on how relevant individual words are for construction slots, they hint at usage preferences of constructions and serve as a helpful indicator for semantic peculiarities of constructions. However, even though collo-profiles constitute an indispensable component of constructicon entries, they pose major challengers for constructicographers: For a constructicographic enterprise it is not feasible to conduct collostructional analyses for hundreds or even thousands of constructions. In this article, we introduce a procedure based on the large language model BERT that allows to predict collo-profiles without having to extensively annotate instances of constructions in a given corpus. Specifically, by discussing the constructions X macht Y ADJP (‘x makes Y ADJ’, e.g. he drives him crazy) and N1 PREP N1 (e.g., bumper to bumper, constructions over constructions), we show how the developed automated system generates collo-profiles based on a limited number of annotated instances. Finally, we place collo-profiles alongside other dimensions of constructional meanings included in the German Constructicon.
Emoticons erfreuen sich auf der ganzen Welt großer Beliebtheit, vor allem in der alltäglichen elektronischen Kommunikation wie E-Mail, SMS, Forumsdiskussionen, Instant Messaging, Facebook oder Twitter. Zum ersten Mal in der Geschichte wurde 2015 von den Sprachbeobachtern der britischen Oxford Dictionaries ein Emoticon zum Wort des Jahres gewählt: das Grinsegesicht, dem die Freudentränen aus den Augen spritzen (vgl.<www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/britisches-wortdes-jahres-was-haben wir-gelacht-1.2740952>, Stand: 8.11.2017). Die Jury begründete ihre Wahl wie folgt: „[E]moji have come to embody a core aspect of living in a digital world that is visually driven, emotionally expressive, and obsessively immediate.“
Much language-related research in cognitive robotics appeals to usage-based models of language as proposed in cognitive linguistics and developmental psychology [1, 2] that emphasise the significance of learning, embodiment and general cognitive development for human language acquisition. Over and above these issues, however, what takes centre stage in these theories are social-cognitive skills of “intention-reading” that are seen as “primary in the language acquisition process” [1] – and also as difficult to incorporate into computational models of language acquisition. The present paper addresses these concerns: we describe work in progress on a series of experiments that take steps towards closing the gap between ‘solipsistic’ symbol grounding in individual robotic agents and socially framed embodied language acquisition in learners that attend to common ground [3] with changing interlocutors.
Speakers’ linguistic experience is for the most part experience with language as used in conversational interaction. Though highly relevant for usage-based linguistics, the study of such data is as yet often left to other frameworks such as conversation analysis and interactional linguistics (Couper-Kuhlen and Selting 2001). On the basis of a case study of salient usage patterns of the two German motion verbs kommen and gehen in spontaneous conversation, the present paper argues for a methodological integration of quantitative corpus-linguistic methods with qualitative conversation analytic approaches to further the usage-based study of conversational interaction.