Refine
Year of publication
- 2016 (347) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (136)
- Article (104)
- Conference Proceeding (51)
- Book (33)
- Part of Periodical (12)
- Working Paper (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (3)
- Other (2)
- Preprint (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (113)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (47)
- Gesprochene Sprache (31)
- Konversationsanalyse (24)
- Wörterbuch (22)
- Interaktion (20)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (19)
- Linguistik (17)
- Diskursanalyse (16)
- Kommunikation (15)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (169)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (35)
- Postprint (17)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (45)
- de Gruyter (34)
- De Gruyter (23)
- Winter (19)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (13)
- Narr Francke Attempto (12)
- Retorika (8)
- Peter Lang (7)
- Linssen Druckcenter (6)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (5)
On the basis of a law text corpus which consists of judicial decisions and jurisprudential papers on so-called assisted suicide from 1977 to 2011, agonal centres are determined within the paradigm of corpus-based pragma-semiotic text analysis. Agonal centres are defined as action-guiding concepts that are in conflict with each other concerning the general acceptance of event interpretations, options for actions, claims of validity, contextual knowledge and values. These action-guiding concepts are derived with the help of quantitative and qualitative methods. Discourse linguistic interpretations are thus rendered more objective with the help of semi-automatic methods; furthermore, specific discourse features of the discourse and approaches to interpretation can be derived from (un)expected linguistic significances of occurrence, distribution, frequency etc. at the linguistic surface. Finally, these agonal centres specific to the language of law are compared to agonal centres which are determined on the basis of a media corpus on the same issue. This provides a comparative insight into the constitution of a seemingly identical fact in everyday and special language, which demonstrates the sociopolitical relevance of analysing the constitution of reality as instructed by language.
This paper presents our model of ‘MultiWord Patterns’ (MWPs). MWPs are defined as recurrent frozen schemes with fixed lexical components and productive slots that have a holistic – but not necessarily idiomatic – meaning and/or function, sometimes only on an abstract level. These patterns can only be reconstructed with corpus-driven, iterative (qualitative-quantitative) methods. This methodology includes complex phrase searches, collocation analysis that not only detects significant word pairs, but also significant syntagmatic cotext patterns and slot analysis with our UWV Tool. This tool allows us to bundle KWICs in order to detect the nature of lexical fillers for and to visualize MWP hierarchies.
Der Band ist ein empirischer Beitrag zur Analyse von Unterrichtskommunikation. Auf der Grundlage von Videoaufzeichnungen werden interaktive Prozesse im gymnasialen Chemieunterricht unter einer multimodalen Perspektive untersucht. Neben der thematischen Fokussierung sprachlicher Aktivitäten der Beteiligten stehen vor allem körperlich-räumliche Aspekte von Interaktion im Vordergrund. Hinsichtlich des Ergänzungsverhältnisses von Wissenskommunikation und Wahrnehmungswahrnehmung ist der Chemieunterricht ein besonders interessanter Fall: Wissensvermittlung erfolgt immer dann, wenn auch etwas wahrgenommen, d.h. beobachtet werden soll. So werden fachsprachliche Begriffe fast immer im Rahmen von Demonstrationsphasen eingeführt. Der Band reinterpretiert in einem abschließenden Kapitel die Analyseergebnisse unter einer didaktischen Perspektive, der ‚De-facto-Didaktik’. Dabei werden Verfahren und Strategien offengelegt, die Lehrer zur Lösung zentraler Anforderungen situativ einsetzen. Ziel der De-facto-Didaktik ist es, Chancen und Risiken aufzudecken, die bestimmte Strategien im Rahmen spezifischer Unterrichtsbedingungen mit sich bringen.
German research on collocation(s) focuses on many different aspects. A comprehensive documentation would be impossible in this short report. Accepting that we cannot do justice to all the contributions to this area, we just pick out some influential comerstones. This selection does not claim to be representative or balanced, but it follows the idea to constitute the backbone of the story we want to tell: Our ‘German’ view of the still ongoing evolution of a notion of ‘collocation’ Although our own work concerns the theoretical background of and the empirical rationale for collocations, lexicography occupies a large space. Some of the recent publications ( Wahrig 2008, Häcki Buhofer et al. 2014) represent a turn to the empirical legitimation for the selection of typical expressions. Nevertheless, linking the empirical evidence to the needs of an abstract lexicographic description (or a didactic format) is still an open issue.
This paper presents C-WEP, the Collection of Writing Errors by Professionals Writers of German. It currently consists of 245 sentences with grammatical errors. All sentences are taken from published texts. All authors are professional writers with high skill levels with respect to German, the genres, and the topics. The purpose of this collection is to provide seeds for more sophisticated writing support tools as only a very small proportion of those errors can be detected by state-of-the-art checkers. C-WEP is annotated on various levels and freely available.
The CELEX database is one of the standard lexical resources for German. It yields a wealth of data especially for phonological and morphological applications. The morphological part comprises deep-structure morphological analyses of German. However, as it was developed in the Nineties, both encoding and spelling are outdated. About one fifth of over 50,000 datasets contain umlauts and signs such as ß. Changes to a modern version cannot be obtained by simple substitution. In this paper, we shortly describe the original content and form of the orthographic and morphological database for German in CELEX. Then we present our work on modernizing the linguistic data. Lemmas and morphological analyses are transferred to a modern standard of encoding by first merging orthographic and morphological information of the lemmas and their entries and then performing a second substitution for the morphs within their morphological analyses. Changes to modern German spelling are performed by substitution rules according to orthographical standards. We show an example of the use of the data for the disambiguation of morphological structures. The discussion describes prospects of future work on this or similar lexicons. The Perl script is publicly available on our website.