Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Working Paper (83) (remove)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (22)
- Deutsch (20)
- Gesprochene Sprache (17)
- Konversationsanalyse (10)
- Transkription (8)
- Forschungsdaten (7)
- Infrastruktur (6)
- Interaktionsanalyse (6)
- Interaktion (5)
- Sprachgebrauch (5)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (48)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (2)
- Erstveröffentlichung (1)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (24)
- Peer-Review (5)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (3)
- Preprint (1)
- Review-Status unbekannt (1)
- Verlagslektorat (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (16)
- Zenodo (5)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) (4)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (3)
- Universität Bielefeld (3)
- Universität Zürich (3)
- CLARIN Legal and Ethical Issues Committee (CLIC) (2)
- DYLAN Project (2)
- Institut für Kommunikationsforschung und Phonetik (2)
- Institut für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität München (2)
Mechanism-based thinking on policy diffusion. A review of current approaches in political science
(2011)
Despite theoretical and methodological progress in what is now coined as the third generation of diffusion studies, explicitly dealing with the causal mechanisms underlying diffusion processes and comparatively analyzing them is only of recent date. As a matter of fact, diffusion research has ended up in a diverse and often unconnected array of theoretical assumptions relying both on rational as well as constructivist reasoning – a circumstance calling for more theoretical coherence and consistency. Against this backdrop, this paper reviews and streamlines diffusion literature in political science. Diffusion mechanisms largely cluster around two causal arguments determining the desires and preferences of actors for choosing alternative policies. First, existing diffusion mechanisms accounts can be grouped according to the rationality for policy adoption, this means that government behavior is based on the instrumental considerations of actors or on constructivist arguments like norms and rule-driven actors. Second, diffusion mechanisms can either directly impact on the beliefs of actors or they might influence the structural conditions for decision-making. Following this logic, four basic diffusion mechanisms can be identified in mechanism-based thinking on policy diffusion: emulation, socialization, learning, and externalities.
This technology watch report discusses digital repository solutions, in the context of the research infrastructure projects CLARIAH-DE, CLARIN, and DARIAH. It provides an overview of different repository systems, comparing them and discussing their respective applicabilities from the perspectives of the project partners at the time of writing.
The General Data Protection Regulation (hereinafter: GDPR), EU Regulation 2016/679 of 27 April 2016, will become applicable on 25 May 2018 and repeal the Personal Data Directive of 24 October 1995.
Unlike a directive, which requires transposition into national laws (while leaving the choice of “forms and methods” to the Member States), a regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States. This means that when the GDPR becomes applicable, all the EU countries will have the same rules regarding the protection of personal data — at least in principle, since some details (including in the area of research — see below) are expressly left to the discretion of the Member States.
The GDPR is a particularly ambitious piece of legislation (consisting of 99 articles and 173 recitals) whose intended territorial scope extends beyond the borders of the European Union. Its main concepts and principles are essentially similar to those of the Personal Data Directive, but enriched with interpretation developed through the case law of the CJEU and the opinions of the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party (hereinafter: WP29).
This White Paper will discuss the main principles of data protection and their impact on language resources, as well as special rules regarding research under the GDPR and the standardisation mechanisms recognized by the Regulation.
The possibilities of re-use and archiving of spoken and written corpora are affected by personality rights (depending on legal tradition also called: the right of publicity), copyright law and data protection / privacy laws. These recommendations include information about legal aspects which should be considered while creating corpora to ensure the greatest archivability and re-usability possible in compliance with current laws.
The information compiled here shall serve researchers who plan to create corpora or who are involved in evaluation of such measures as a guideline. This information is not exhaustive or to be considered as legal advice. Researchers should consult institutional legal departments and management before making legally relevant decisions. That said, further legal expertise should be sought if possible as early as project planning phases.
Die folgenden Ausführungen zur Maskierung basieren auf den Erfahrungen bei der Aufbereitung der Daten des Forschungs- und Lehrkorpus Gesprochenes Deutsch (FOLK) für die Veröffentlichung in der Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD). Sie sollen anderen Forschern und Forschungsprojekten als praktische Hilfestellung für die Maskierung von Aufnahmen dienen, können aber selbstverständlich nicht die gesamte Bandbreite von Einzelfallentscheidungen und Pflichten der Forschenden abdecken.
Es werden sowohl allgemeine Hinweise zur Maskierung von Audio- und Videoaufnahmen gegeben als auch praktische Tipps zur Umsetzung der Maskierung mit dem Transkriptionseditor FOLKER.
Die in den Ausführungen geschilderten arbeitsteiligen Prozesse in größeren Projekten können in kleineren Projekten einzelner Forscher selbstverständlich auch von einer einzelnen Person ausgeführt werden.
Who understands Low German today and who can speak it? Who makes use of media and cultural events in Low German? What images do people in northern Germany associate with Low German and what is their view of their regional language?
These and further questions are answered in this brochure with the help of representative data collected in a telephone survey of a total of 1,632 people from eight federal states (Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania and Schleswig-Holstein as well as Brandenburg, North Rhine-Westphalia and Saxony-Anhalt).