Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (8)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Review (1)
Language
- German (6)
- English (3)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (10)
Keywords
- Sprachgeschichte (10) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (6)
- Postprint (2)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (10) (remove)
Publisher
- Beltz Juventa (1)
- FFLCH-USP (1)
- IDS-Verlag (1)
- Niemeyer (1)
- Olms (1)
- Peter Lang (1)
- Routledge, Taylor & Francis (1)
- Steiner (1)
- Wachholtz (1)
Der Beitrag beschreibt einen spezifisch diskurslinguistischen Zugang zu der sprachgeschichtlichen Frage nach durch gesellschaftlich-politische Faktoren hervorgerufenen Umbrüchen. Orientiert an den Foucaultschen Kategorien der Serialität und der Diskontinuität werden diese methodischen Implikaturen auf die Umbrüche 1918/19 und 1945ff bezogen. Das Methodenmodell besteht im Wesentlichen aus zwei Aspekten: Als Faktor von hoher Umbruchrelevanz wird zum einen der soziopragmatische Bezug zu Diskursakteuren hergestellt. Exemplarisch werden zum andern diese Epochen kennzeichnende demokratiegeschichtliche Institutionalisierungsakte im Sinne Searles beschrieben. Damit wird ein Beitrag zur diskurslinguistischen Methodenreflexion geleistet.
Word Families in Diachrony. An epoch-spanning structure for the word families of older German
(2022)
The ‘Word Families in Diachrony’ project (WoDia), for which a funding application to the DFG is in preparation, aims to provide a database driven online research environment that will enable processes of change in the entire historical vocabulary of German to be investigated by focusing on the changes in word families and the individual means of word formation. WoDia will embed the vocabularies of Old High German (OHG), Middle High German (MHG), Old Saxon (OS), and Middle Low German (MLG) in a database, resulting in a word-family structure for High and Low German from the beginnings up to the 15th century (for High German) and up to the 17th century (for Low German). The basis of the vocabulary is provided by reference dictionaries of the four historical varieties, whereas the word families’ historical structure is based on the word-family dictionary of OHG by Jochen Splett (1992). Each lemma in the database will be assigned, where appropriate, to a word family. The individual word-formation elements and the word-formation hierarchy will be mapped in a structural formula. The etymologically corresponding lemmas and word families of the different periods/varieties of older German will be linked so that an analysis across the varieties will also be possible. The annotations of word families in the database (e. g., relating to word structure) will be supplemented by linking their lemmas to the online dictionaries and to the reference corpora of Old German (OS and OHG), MHG, and MLG.
This paper studies the morphological productivity of German N+N compounding patterns from a diachronic perspective. It argues that the productivity of compounds increases due to syntactic influence from genitive constructions (“improper compounds”) in Early New High German. Both quantitative and qualitative productivity measures are adapted from derivational morphology and tested on compound data from the Mainz Corpus of (Early) New High German (1500–1710).
Die Lexikographen Jacob Grimm (1785-1863) und Wilhelm Grimm (1786-1859). Gedanken zur 200-Jahr-Feier
(1986)
In this paper, an exploratory data-driven method is presented that extracts word-types from diachronic corpora that have undergone the most pronounced change in frequency of occurrence in a given period of time. Combined with statistical methods from time series analysis, the method is able to find meaningful patterns and relationships in diachronic corpora, an idea that is still uncommon in linguistics. This indicates that the approach can facilitate an improved understanding of diachronic processes.
The present paper deals with grammaticalization as a comprehensive model of erosive processes in the history of natural languages, exemplified in German and Brazilian Portuguese. Grammaticalization is conceived of as the reduction of pragmatic versatility, semantic concreteness, syntactic liberty and phonetic substance of linguistic elements. It is subdivided into the processes of lexicalization, which transforms polylexematic into monolexematic elements, and deslexicalization, which reduces lexematic to sublexematic elements. In the middle of these processes stands the lexicon, which is seen as the central stock of linguistic elements. Within the lexicon, the process of grammaticalization continues, from lexical word classes through intermediate classes to grammatical word classes. The lower boundary of the lexicon is a critical threshold, down to which the process of grammaticalization is compensated for by linguistic recycling that leads lexematic elements back into the linguistic circuit, through the formation of new polylexematic units. Beyond this threshold, however, no recycling is possible any more, so that elements which have once lost their lexical character are condemned to disappear in the long run. The different stages of grammaticalization are introduced and illustrated by means of concrete examples, first from Brazilian Portuguese and afterwards from German.
Der Aufsatz untersucht die grammatische Gestaltung zweigliedriger Nominalgruppen mit quantifizierendem nominalem Erstglied (Nquant) und quantifiziertem, durch ein Adjektivattribut erweitertem, nominalem Zweitglied (Adj+N), z.B. (mit) einem Glas kaltem Wasser. In der deutschen Gegenwartssprache ist in solchen Fügungen mit Varianten zu rechnen: (mit) einem Glas kalten Wassers, (mit) einem Glas kaltes Wasser. Insgesamt lassen sich fünf Konstruktionstypen unterscheiden. Anhand einer Belegsammlung aus literarischen Prosatexten vom 17. bis zum 20. Jahrhundert wird insbesondere die quantitative Verteilung von Konstruktionen mit Genitiv vs. Kasusübereinstimmung ins Auge gefasst. Anders als bei Nquant+N-Gruppen ohne Adjektivattribut im Zweitglied zeigt sich ein kräftiger Anstieg im Anteil der Genitivkonstruktion vom 17. bis zum 19. und nur ein leichter Rückgang im 20. Jahrhundert. Dieser Befund stimmt nur zum Teil mit den Darstellungen in der Standardliteratur überein. Eine mögliche Erklärung für die quantitative Entwicklung der Genitivkonstruktion in der Literatursprache liegt im Einfluss normativer Grammatiken.