Refine
Year of publication
- 2014 (438) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (202)
- Article (140)
- Conference Proceeding (52)
- Book (22)
- Part of Periodical (11)
- Working Paper (7)
- Other (3)
- Preprint (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (438) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (143)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (49)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (36)
- Linguistik (29)
- Germanistik (25)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (21)
- Wörterbuch (19)
- Gesprochene Sprache (18)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (18)
- Computerlinguistik (15)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (172)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (23)
- Postprint (11)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (138)
- Peer-Review (63)
- Verlags-Lektorat (7)
- Peer-review (6)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (2)
- (Verlags)Lektorat (1)
- (Verlags-)Lektorat (1)
- Peer-Revied (1)
- Preprint (1)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (95)
- De Gruyter (84)
- de Gruyter (33)
- Stauffenburg (12)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (11)
- Lang (10)
- Springer (6)
- Winter (6)
- Benjamins (5)
- Universitätsverlag Hildesheim (5)
This article presents preliminary results indicating that speakers have a different pitch range when they speak a foreign language compared to the pitch variation that occurs when they speak their native language. To this end, a learner corpus with French and German speakers was analyzed. Results suggest that speakers indeed produce a smaller pitch range in the respective L2. This is true for both groups of native speakers. A possible explanation for this finding is that speakers are less confident in their productions, therefore, they concentrate more on segments and words and subsequently refrain from realizing pitch range more native-like. For language teaching, the results suggest that learners should be trained extensively on the more pronounced use of pitch in the foreign language.
Das Konzept,Textgrammatik' wird einer kritischen Prüfung unterzogen. Die Hypothese, für die argumentiert wird, ist, dass eine strikte Auslegung im Sinne der Annahme, Texte hätten eine spezifische Grammatik, wie Sätze eine spezifische Grammatik haben, nicht aufrecht erhalten werden kann. Grundlegende Eigenschaften, nämlich die Existenz eines hierarchisch aufgebauten Regelsystems, eine spezifische Form von Gegliedertheit und Formbezogenheit, sind anders als auf Satzebene beim Text nicht gegeben. Exemplarisch werden die Phänomene Anaphorik sowie, ausführlicher, Erscheinungsformen der Ellipse bzw. aus dem elliptischen Formenkreis diskutiert. Das Fazit ist: ,Textgrammatik‘ sollte - wenn überhaupt gebraucht - nur als Verweis auf die Textsensibilität der Satzgrammatik dienen.
Der Blick zurück nach vorn
(2014)
Topologisches Satzmodell
(2014)
We start by trying to answer a question that has already been asked by de Schryver et al. (2006): Do dictionary users (frequently) look up words that are frequent in a corpus. Contrary to their results, our results that are based on the analysis of log files from two different online dictionaries indicate that users indeed look up frequent words frequently. When combining frequency information from the Mannheim German Reference Corpus and information about the number of visits in the Digital Dictionary of the German Language as well as the German language edition of Wiktionary, a clear connection between corpus and look-up frequencies can be observed. In a follow-up study, we show that another important factor for the look-up frequency of a word is its temporal social relevance. To make this effect visible, we propose a de-trending method where we control both frequency effects and overall look-up trends.