Refine
Year of publication
- 2000 (151) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (74)
- Article (48)
- Book (9)
- Conference Proceeding (8)
- Part of Periodical (5)
- Review (3)
- Report (2)
- Working Paper (1)
Language
- German (134)
- English (15)
- Polish (1)
- Portuguese (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (86)
- Verb (10)
- Neue Medien (9)
- Sprachgeschichte (9)
- Kommunikation (8)
- Sprachwandel (8)
- Kongress (7)
- Wortbildung (7)
- Rezension (6)
- Semantik (6)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (49)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (18)
- Postprint (6)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (58)
- Peer-Review (11)
- Peer-review (3)
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (23)
- de Gruyter (23)
- Niemeyer (9)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (5)
- Dudenverlag (4)
- Narr (4)
- Leske + Budrich (3)
- Olms (3)
- Springer (3)
- Institut für deutsche Sprache (IDS) (2)
Durch den Dezentralisierungsprozess in Großbritannien gibt es seit etwa einem Jahr neue Hoffnung für ein dauerhaftes Überleben der gälischen Sprache in Schottland. Mit der Einrichtung eines schottischen Parlaments, das seit Mai 1999 für innere Belange Schottlands verantwortlich ist, ist die gälischsprachige Bevölkerung viel näher an das Machtzentrum heran gerückt.
Identity effects in phonology are deviations from regular phonological form (i.e. canonical patterns) which are due to the relatedness between words. More specifically, identity effects are those deviations which have the function to enhance similarity in the surface phonological form of morphologically related words. In rule-based generative phonology the effects in question are described by means of the cycle. For example, the stress on the second syllable in cond[ɛ]nsation as opposed to the stresslessness of the second syllable in comp[ǝ]nsation is described by applying the stress rules initially to the sterns thereby yielding condénse and cómpensàte. Subsequently the stress rules are reapplied to the affixed words with the initial stress assignment (i.e. stress on the second syllable in condense, but not in compensate) leaving its mark in the output form (cf. Chomsky and Halle 1968). A second example are words like lie[p]los 'unloving' in German, which shows the effects of neutralization in coda position (i.e. only voiceless obstruents may occur in coda position) even though the obstruent should 'regularly' be syllabified in head position (i.e. bl is a wellformed syllable head in German). Here the stern is syllabified on an initial cycle, obstruent devoicing applies (i.e. lie[p]) and this structure is left intact when affixation applies (i.e. lie[p ]Ios ) (cf. Hall 1992). As a result the stern of lie[p]los is identical to the base lie[p].
This paper deals with different views of lexical semantics. The focus is on the relationship between lexical expressions and conceptual components. First the assumptions about lexicalization and decompositionality of concepts shared by the most semanticists are presented, followed by a discussion of the differences between two-level-semantics and one-level-semantics. The final part is concentrated on the interpretation of conceptual components in situations of communication.
In den achtziger Jahren veröffentlichte die Süddeutsche Zeitung eine Reihe von Briefen, die Gisela aus New York an Peter irgendwo in Deutschland, genauer in Jena, schrieb. Im Folgenden ist aus jedem Jahr jeweils ein Brief abgedruckt. Zu diesem Zweck waren einige Rearrangements der Originale notwendig; es ist so, wie es Goethe in Bezug auf die Wiedergabe von Anekdoten und Berichte unerhörter Begebenheiten formuliert hat: "Alles bleibt gleich, oder nichts."
Departing from Rooth's focus interpretation theory the article discusses two types of (German) ellipsis phenomena: direct alternative and implicit alternative coordinative ellipsis. For the first type, which includes Stripping, Gapping, ATB, and RNR, it is characteristic that the semantic value of either conjunct instantiates the context variable of the respective focus operator in the other. For German Polarity ellipsis and Sluicing, which constitute the other type, it is characteristic that the semantic value, which instantiates the variable given by the focus operator in the second conjunct, must be derived from the semantic value of the first conjunct and that the second conjunct always hosts an alternative set inducing item which demands new information focus in the first conjunct.