Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Article (25)
- Conference Proceeding (3)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Other (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (30)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (30) (remove)
Keywords
- Deutsch (12)
- Konversationsanalyse (5)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (5)
- Rechtschreibung (3)
- Rezension (3)
- Computerlinguistik (2)
- Computervermittelte Kommunikation (2)
- Conversation analysis (2)
- Englisch (2)
- Formale Semantik (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (19)
- Postprint (6)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-review (30) (remove)
Publisher
Interview mit Ulrich Engel
(2017)
Nach Bemerkungen zur Abgrenzung des Gegenstandes und einem kurzen Forschungsbericht zur Entwicklung der gesprächsanalytischen Forschung zu Beratung und verwandten Flandlungssituationen wird die gesprächsanalytische Vorgehensweise an einem einfachen Fallbeispiel demonstriert (Kap. 2) mit dem Ziel, das Erkenntnispotential bei der Aufdeckung von Handlungsstrukturen im Gespräch und damit verknüpfter inhärenter Probleme der Gesprächsführung zu verdeutlichen. Vor dem Hintergrund der ersten Verlaufsanalyse werden dann Kernstrukturen des Beratens systematisch dargestellt, insbesondere das Handlungsschema Beraten und die strukturellen Vorgaben für die sequenzielle Durchführung (Kap. 3). Schließlich werden ausgewählte Strategien des Gesprächshandelns von Ratsuchenden und Ratgebern dargestellt, mit denen diese versuchen, ihre Perspektive zur Geltung zu bringen, und die mit den Zielsetzungen und dem Rollenverständnis der Akteure, ihrem Selbstverständnis als Handelnde und ihrem Umgang mit spezifischen inhärenten Problemen des Beratungshandeln Zusammenhängen (Kap. 4). Als Materialgrundlage wird ein gemischtes Korpus von Beratungsgesprächen aus privaten und unterschiedlichen institutioneilen Kontexten benutzt (u.a. Studienberatung, ärztliche Beratung, kommunale Mieterberatung).
Reformulating place
(2013)
This report examines what can be accomplished in conversation by reformulating a reference to a place using the practices of repair. It is based on an analysis of a collection of place references situated in second pair parts of adjacency pairs taken from a wide range of field recordings of talk-in-interaction. Not surprisingly, place references are sometimes reformulated so as to indicate a misspeaking or in pursuit of recipient recognition. At other times, however, we show that place references can be reformulated to more adequately implement the action of a turn in prosecuting the course of action of which it is a part. In these cases repairing a place reference can target a source of trouble associated with implementing the action of a turn at talk, and thus reformulating place can serve as a practical resource for accomplishing a range of interactional tasks. We conclude with a more complex case in which two reformulations are deployed in responding to a so-called ‘double-barrelled’ initiating action.
Prosodic constructions used to compete for the speaking turn in conversation have been widely studied (French & Local (1983), Kurtić et al. (2013)). Usually, turn competition arises in overlapping talk between at least two speakers. Coordination between participants in their prosodic design of talk (Szczepek-Reed, 2006) and social action (Gorisch et al. 2012), as well as entrainment in more general terms (Levitan et al. 2011), is well established in the literature. Nevertheless, previous studies on turn competition and overlap do not investigate the prosodic design of turn competitive incomings in reference to the orientation of the speakers to each other. Rather, they assume that prosodic constructions are used for turn competition regardless of the co-participants’ design of the turn. In this paper, we ask whether the prosodic design of turn competitive talk is co-constructed between two participants talking in overlap. More specifically, we investigate whether the prosodic design of one participant’s in overlap talk is developed with respect to the interlocutor’s prosodic features during the same portion of overlapped talk, and whether this prosodic matching can discriminate between the overlaps that are competitive and those that are not. 183 Our analyses are based on two-speaker overlaps drawn from a corpus of multi-party face-to face conversation between four friends recorded in British English (Kurtic et al. 2012). 3407 instances of twospeaker overlaps have been extracted from 4 hours of talk. Two independent conversation analysts performed the interactional categorisation of overlaps into competitive and non-competitive for all these two-speaker overlap instances and achieved a good agreement of alpha=0.807 (Krippendorff 2004) as measured on a subset of 808 overlaps selected for our initial analysis. For the analysis of prosodic features we focus on F0 related features: mean, slope, span and contour, all of which have previously been shown to be used by each overlapping speaker separately for turn competition (Kurtic et al. 2009; Oertel et al. 2012). We investigate the similarity in F0 mean, slope and span by correlating these features across the two participants. For F0 contour, a similarity coefficient is computed using dynamic programming method described in Gorisch et al. (2012). We consider the difference in F0 contour similarity in competitive and non-competitive overlaps as an indication of intonational matching being a turn competitive resource. We conduct these analyses for overlaps that are clearly competitive or noncompetitive as indicated by inter-annotator agreement. In addition, we qualitatively explore those cases that annotators disagree on in order to investigate whether they reveal further important interactional or prosodic features of in-overlap talk. Our preliminary results suggest that conversational participants attend and adapt to the interlocutor during overlap depending on whether they return competition or not. We explain our findings in relation to previous work on turn competition in overlap, discuss the quantitative method employed and also address the possible consequences of our results for the study of prosodic realization of other social actions in conversation.
Feedback utterances are among the most frequent in dialogue. Feedback is also a crucial aspect of linguistic theories that take social interaction, involving language, into account. This paper introduces the corpora and datasets of a project scrutinizing this kind of feedback utterances in French. We present the genesis of the corpora (for a total of about 16 hours of transcribed and phone force-aligned speech) involved in the project. We introduce the resulting datasets and discuss how they are being used in on-going work with focus on the form-function relationship of conversational feedback. All the corpora created and the datasets produced in the framework of this project will be made available for research purposes.