Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (5)
- Article (3)
- Conference Proceeding (2)
- Book (1)
Keywords
- language contact (11) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (7)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (2)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
- Peer-Review (3)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (1)
Publisher
When we first started the project of looking at minority languages through a linguistic landscape lens, we felt that the visibility of minority languages in public space had been insufficiently dealt with in traditional minority language research. A linguistic landscape approach, as it had developed over the last years, would constitute a valuable path to explore, by looking at the ‘same old issues’ of language contact and language conflict from a specific angle. We were convinced that fresh linguistic landscape data would be able to provide innovative and useful insights into ‘patterns of language […] use, official language policies, prevalent language attitudes, [and] power relations between different linguistic groups’ (Backhaus 2007, p. 11). The linguistic landscape approach, as presented by the different authors in this volume, has clearly proven to be a heuristic appropriate and relevant for a wide range of minority language situations. More specifically, the ideas and analyses in the different chapters do contribute to a further understanding of minority languages and their speakers. They deepen our comprehension of language policies, power relations and ideologies in minority language settings.
Providing an innovative approach to the written displays of minority languages in public space this volume explores minority language situations through the lens of linguistic landscape research. Based on very tangible data it explores the 'same old issues' of language contact and language conflict in new ways.
Cette contribution se concentre sur les locuteurs de l’allemand en situation minoritaire dans le Caucase. Il s’agit de descendants d’anciennes minorités allemandes de l’Empire russe et de l’Union soviétique, qui ont émigré vers les territoires transcaucasiens en plusieurs phases à partir de la fin du xviiie siècle. Les personnes interrogées sont celles qui, en raison de mariages interethniques, ont évité les déportations de 1941 et vivent toujours dans le Caucase du Sud. Avec les méthodes caractéristiques de la sociolinguistique, l’auteure a enregistré, transcrit et analysé des entretiens formels semi-dirigés effectués en 2017 dans le Caucase du Sud avec deux générations de descendants. L’article présente la situation des variétés de l’allemand (dialecte souabe et allemand standard) et de leurs locuteurs dans des constellations de langues en contact dans le Caucase ainsi que les actions menées par différents groupes d’acteurs pour préserver la langue et la culture allemandes en Géorgie.
Dieser Beitrag beschreibt Varietäten des Deutschen, die in exterritorialen deutschen Gemeinschaften gesprochen werden. Viele dieser Gruppen gehen auf Wanderbewegungen im Mittelalter oder in der frühen Neuzeit zurück und haben spezifische Varietäten entwickelt, die durch Dialektmischung und Sprachkontakt mit den Umgebungssprachen gekennzeichnet sind. Eine weitere Gruppe sind sogenannte „Grenzminderheiten“, exterritoriale Gemeinschaften, die nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg entstanden sind und an deutschsprachige Länder angrenzen. Der Artikel gibt zunächst einen historischen Überblick über die verschiedenen deutschsprachigen Minderheiten. Anschließend werden die unterschiedlichen soziolinguistischen Rahmenbedingungen der jeweiligen Sprachgemeinschaften angesprochen und anhand von Beispielen von Gemeinschaften mit unterschiedlichem soziolinguistischem und sprachlichem Hintergrund illustriert.
This article examines the language contact situation as well as the language attitudes of the Caucasian Germans, descendants of German-born inhabitants of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union who emigrated in 1816/17 to areas of Transcaucasia. After deportations and migrations, the group of Caucasian Germans now consists of those who have since emigrated to Germany and those who still live in the South Caucasus. It’s the first time that sociolinguistic methods have been used to record data from the generation who experienced living in the South Caucasus and in Germany as well as from two succeeding generations. Initial results will be presented below with a focus on the language contact constellations of German varieties as well as on consequences of language contact and language repression, which both affect language attitudes.
Based on the empirical data of 97 fourth-graders from three districts of Braunschweig in Germany, this paper investigates the possibility of changing semantic frames in multilingual communities. The focus of study is the verb field of self-motion. In a free-sorting task involving 52 verbs, Turkish-speaking students, in particular, placed the verbs schleichen (‘to sneak’) and kommen (‘to come’) in the same group. When explaining the perceived similarity they also used the word schleichen (‘to sneak’), in a specific grammatical construction that is not found in Standard German. This paper suggests that semantic frames may change along with grammatical constructions when typologically distinct languages come into close contact.
In the lexicon of pidgin and creole languages we can see an important part of these languages’ history of origin and of language contact. The current paper deals with the lexical sources of Tok Pisin and, more specifically, with words of German origin found in this language. During the period of German colonial domination of New Guinea and a number of insular territories in the Pacific (ca. 1885–1915), German words entered the emerging Tok Pisin lexicon. Based on a broad range of lexical and lexicographic data from the early 20th century up until today, we investigate the actual or presumed German origin of a number of Tok Pisin words and trace different lexical processes of integration that are linked to various, often though not always colonially determined, contact settings and sociocultural interactions.
This contribution aims to shed light on the structural development of Luxembourgish German in the 19th Century. The fact that it is embedded in a multilingual context raises many research questions. The evidence comprises predominantly bilingual German/French public notices issued by the City of Luxembourg in this period. The analysis of two conjunctions suggests that processes of replication and interlingual transfer are sources for Variation. It shows that the influence of French was particularly acute during the “French period” (1795-1814). However, rather than working in isolation, the language contact phenomena operate on the basis of similar constructions existing in the borrowing language. In addition, ancient German forms quickly disappeared, despite showing similarity to forms in the local dialect.
Lexicography of Language Contact: An Internet Dictionary of Words of German Origin in Tok Pisin
(2016)
The paper presents an ongoing project in the domain of lexicography of language contact, namely, the “Internet Dictionary of Words of German Origin in Tok Pisin”. The German influence onto the lexicon of the main pidgin language of Papua New Guinea has its roots in the German colonial empire, where Tok Pisin played an important role as a lingua franca in the colony of German New Guinea. Tok Pisin also served as an intermediate language for many borrowing processes; that is, German loans entered many languages in the South Pacific via Tok Pisin. The Internet Dictionary of Words of German Origin in Tok Pisin is based on all available lexicographical sources from the early 20th century up to now. These sources are systematically evaluated within our project; the results will be documented in the dictionary. The microstructure of the dictionary will be presented with respect to its major features: documentation of sources, examples for word usage, audio files, and lexicographic comment.
During the second half of the 19th century, extended regions of the South Pacific came to be part of the German colonial empire. The colonial administration included repeated and diverse efforts to implement German as the official language in several settings (administration, government, education) in the colonial areas. Due to unfamiliar sociological and linguistic conditions, to competition with English as a(nother) prestigious colonizer language, and to the short time-span of the German colonial rule, these efforts rendered only little language-related effect. Nevertheless, some linguistic traces remained, and these seem to reflect in what areas language implementation was organized most thoroughly. The study combines two directions of investigation: First, taking a historical approach, legal and otherwise official documents and information are considered in order to understand how the implementation process was planned and (intended to be) carried out. Second, from a linguistic perspective, documented lexical borrowings and other traces of linguis tic contact are identified that can corroborate the historical findings by reflecting a greater effect of contact in such areas where the implementation of German was carried out most strictly. The goal of this paper is, firstly, to trace the political and missionary activities in language planning with regard to German in the colonial Pacific, rather similar to a modem language policy scenario when a new code of prestige or national unity is implemented. Secondly, these activities are evaluated in the face of the outcome that can be observed, in the historical practice as well as in long-term effects of language contact up until today.