Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (14)
- Article (7)
- Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
- Review (1)
Language
- German (20)
- English (3)
- Portuguese (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (24)
Keywords
- Kognition (24) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (3)
- Postprint (2)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (2)
- Preprint (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (4)
- Peer-Review (2)
Publisher
- de Gruyter (7)
- Schwann (4)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2)
- Stauffenburg (2)
- Narr (1)
- SAGE (1)
- Springer (1)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (1)
- de Gryuter (1)
What is the subject of German linguistics? This seemingly simple question has no obvious answer. In the ZGL’s first issue, the editors required contributions to cover the whole of the German language and to be theoretically sound but application-orientated, whereas the current ZGL-homepage defines the German language of present and history in all its differentiations as its subject matter.
Looking through the fifty volumes of ZGL, three relationships can be identified as presumably enlightening the role of language, in particular the German language: language and mind; language and language use; language and culture. Though of a different systematic type, language and data should be added as an increasingly important pairing for conceptualizing language. On this basis, I also discuss the position of linguistic studies of the German language, mirrored in the ZGL-volumes, between social, cultural and natural sciences, as well as the corresponding epistemic approaches – like explaining vs. understanding.
As immigration and mobility increases, so do interactions between people from different linguistic backgrounds. Yet while linguistic diversity offers many benefits, it also comes with a number of challenges. In seven empirical articles and one commentary, this Special Issue addresses some of the most significant language challenges facing researchers in the 21st century: the power language has to form and perpetuate stereotypes, the contribution language makes to intersectional identities, and the role of language in shaping intergroup relations. By presenting work that aims to shed light on some of these issues, the goal of this Special Issue is to (a) highlight language as integral to social processes and (b) inspire researchers to address the challenges we face. To keep pace with the world’s constantly evolving linguistic landscape, it is essential that we make progress toward harnessing language’s power in ways that benefit 21st century globalized societies.
Der Beitrag stellt zunächst die drei grundlegenden methodischen Verfahren der Konversationsanalyse und der mittlerweile deren Vorgehen folgenden diskursiven Psychologie dar: die Transkription, die detaillierte Sequenzanalyse am Einzelfall und die (komparative) Analyse von Datenkollektionen. Nach einer Übersicht über grundlegende Befunde zur Organisation von Interaktionen wird auf drei psychologische Untersuchungsbereiche eingegangen: Die Konstitution von Identität in Gesprächen, die Rolle von Kognitionen in der sozialen Interaktion und die Erforschung von Psychotherapiegesprächen.
Vorwort
(1995)
Juristische Texte sind schwer zu verstehen, insbesondere – aber nicht nur – für juristische Laien. Dieser Band beleuchtet diese These ausgehend von linguistischen Verständlichkeitsmodellen und kognitionswissenschaftlichen Modellen der menschlichen Textverarbeitung. Anhand von Aufzeichnungen von Blickbewegungen beim Lesen, einem sogenannten Lesekorpus, werden umfangreiche statistische Modelle berechnet. Diese geben Auskunft über Fragen psycholinguistischer Grundlagenforschung auf der Wort-, Satz- und Textebene. Ferner wird untersucht, wie sich Reformulierungen auf den Verstehensprozess auswirken. Dabei stehen bekannte Komplexitätsmarker deutscher juristischer Texte im Fokus: Nominalisierungen, komplexe Nominalphrasen und syntaktisch komplexe Texte.
Bericht über die 15. Arbeitstagung zur Gesprächsforschung vom 30. März - 1. April 2011 in Mannheim
(2011)
The paper discusses the range of findings and theoretical concepts on which a conversation analytic study of the constitution of meaning in interaction might draw. It focuses on research on problems of word-semantics and linguistic categorization in context which have been researched by cognitivists and conversation analysts. While cognitive studies have mainly dealt with semantic representation, syntactico-semantic composition and the impact of pragmatic and inferential factors on interpretation, discursive approaches have centered upon interactional processes and the uses and functions of categorization in talk-in-interaction. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects and eventual benefits of a more intense combination of the cognitive and the discursive approach.
The paper discusses the range of findings and theoretical concepts on which a conversation analytic study of the constitution of meaning in interaction might draw. It focuses on research on problems of word-semantics and linguistic categorization in context which have been researched by cognitivists and conversation analysts. While cognitive studies have mainly dealt with semantic representation, syntactico-semantic composition and the impact of pragmatic and inferential factors on interpretation, discursive approaches have centered upon interactional processes and the uses and functions of categorization in talk-in-interaction. The article concludes with a discussion of the prospects and eventual benefits of a more intense combination of the cognitive and the discursive approach.
Este artigo desenvolve sete teses acerca do conceito de coerência e de outros conceitos básicos da análise do discurso e da lingüística textual. Na primeira parte, inicia-se com algumas observações históricas acerca das noções de texto, discurso e comunicação. Na segunda parte, discute as relações entre coerência e coesão, intertextualidade e polifonia, bem como entre coerência e intertextualidade; define coesão como um tipo especial de coerência e polifonia como um tipo especial de intertextualidade e argumenta que as noções clássicas de coerência e intertextualidade representam perspectivas opostas dentro da lingüística textual. Na Terceira parte, busca uma redefinição de coerência que possa explicar esse conceito simultaneamente para o discurso, a cognição e o texto. Descarta as definições de coerência como resultado da constituição de sentido e como estado-alvo estável de um sistema e propõe sua definição como relativa uniformidade local de um sistema, segundo parâmetros considerados relevantes pelo observador. No último item, postula que coerência e incoerência são igualmente necessários dentro de qualquer sistema natural para garantir sua evolução histórica.