Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- Friesisch (3) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (2)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (2)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (2)
- Peer-Review (1)
Publisher
In the context of a Nordic Conference on Bilingualism, it can be a rewarding task to look at issues such as language planning, policy and legislation from a perspective of the southern neighbours of the Nordic world. This paper therefore intends to point attention towards a case of societal multilingualism at the periphery of the Nordic world by dealing with recent developments in language policy and legislation with regard to the North Frisian speech community in the German Land of Schleswig-Holstein. As I will show, it is striking to what degree there are considerable differences in the discourse on minority protection and language legislation between the Nordic countries and a cultural area which may arguably be considered to be part of the Nordic fringe - and which itself occasionally takes Scandinavia as a reference point, e.g. in the recent adoption of a pan-Frisian flag modelled on the Nordic cross (Falkena 2006).
The main focus of the paper will be on the Frisian Act which was passed in the Parliament of Schleswig-Holstein in late 2004. It provides a certain legal basis for some political activities with regard to Frisian, but falls short of creating a true spirit of minority language protection and/or revitalisation. In contrast to the traditions of the German and Danish minorities along the German-Danish border and to minority protection in Northern Scandinavia (in particular to Sámi language rights), the approach chosen in the Frisian Act is extremely weak and has no connotation of long-term oriented language-planning, let alone a rights-based perspective.
The paper will then look at policy developments in the time since the Act was passed, e.g. in the Schleswig-Holstein election campaign in 2005, and on latest perceptions of the Frisian language situation in the discourse on North Frisian Policy in Schleswig-Holstein majority society. In the final part of the paper, I will discuss reasons for the differences in minority language policy discourse between Germany and the Nordic countries, and try to provide an outlook on how Frisian could benefit from its geographic proximity to the Nordic world.
This chapter analyses the impact of political decentralization in a state on the position of ethnic and linguistic minorities, in particular with regard to the role of parliamentary assemblies in the political system. It relates a number of typical functions of parliaments to the specific needs of minorities and their languages. The most important of these functions are the representation of the minority and responsiveness to the minority’s needs. The chapter then discusses six examples from the European Union (and Norway) which prototypically represent different types of parliamentary decentralization: the ethnically defined Sameting in Norway and its importance for the Sámi population, the Scottish Parliament and its role for speakers of Scottish Gaelic, the German regional parliaments of the Länder of Schleswig-Holstein and Saxony and their impact on the Frisian and Sorbian minorities respectively, the autonomy of predominantly German-speaking South Tyrol within the Italian state, and finally the situation of the speakers of Latgalian in Latvia, where a decentralized parliament is missing. The chapter also makes suggestions on comparisons of these situations with minorities in Russia. It finally argues that political decentralization may indeed empower minorities to gain a greater voice in their states, even if much ultimately depends on individual factors in each situation and the attitudes by the majority population and the political center.
Der nicht selten als dialektfrei geltende norddeutsche Raum erweist sich in Wahrheit als ein kompliziertes Mehrsprachenland. Neben der in der Regel gut beherrschten Standardsprache finden sich die dem Standard gegenüber deutlich unterschiedenen Abstandsprachen Niederdeutsch und Friesisch sowie das Dänische. Ihre Statusproblematik, die geographische Verteilung und die Kommunikativität der die norddeutsche Sprachsituation bildenden Sprachen werden erläutert, wobei auch das kulturelle Umfeld, in dem sich das Sprachennebeneinander entfaltet, beschrieben wird. Der Schwerpunkt der Ausführungen liegt auf dem Niederdeutschen, für dessen vielfältige Verwendung Textbeispiele angeführt werden.