Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Conference Proceeding (12)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Article (4)
- Other (1)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Automatische Spracherkennung (26) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (11)
- Veröffentlichungsversion (9)
- Postprint (3)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (15)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (5)
- Review-Status-unbekannt (1)
- Verlags-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- European Language Resources Association (4)
- de Gruyter (3)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie und Computerlinguistik (2)
- The Association for Computational Linguistics (2)
- Association for Computational Linguistics (1)
- Austrian academy of sciences (1)
- Bibliographisches Institut (1)
- Frank & Timme (1)
- German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology und Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (1)
- Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (1)
The automatic recognition of idioms poses a challenging problem for NLP applications. Whereas native speakers can intuitively handle multiword expressions whose compositional meanings are hard to trace back to individual word semantics, there is still ample scope for improvement regarding computational approaches. We assume that idiomatic constructions can be characterized by gradual intensities of semantic non-compositionality, formal fixedness, and unusual usage context, and introduce a number of measures for these characteristics, comprising count-based and predictive collocation measures together with measures of context (un)similarity. We evaluate our approach on a manually labelled gold standard, derived from a corpus of German pop lyrics. To this end, we apply a Random Forest classifier to analyze the individual contribution of features for automatically detecting idioms, and study the trade-off between recall and precision. Finally, we evaluate the classifier on an independent dataset of idioms extracted from a list of Wikipedia idioms, achieving state-of-the art accuracy.
Editorial
(2020)
Journal for language technology and computational linguistics. Special Issue on offensive language
(2020)
Recent years have seen a sharp increase in studies of offensive language (and related notions such as abusive language, hate speech, verbal aggression etc.) as well as of patterns of online behavior such as cyberbullying and trolling. Multiple efforts have been launched for the exploration of computational approaches and the establishment of benchmark datasets for various languages (Basile et al. (2019), Wiegand et al. (2018), Zampieri et al. (2019)).
Der Mythos „Künstliche Intelligenz“ wird besonders von der sogenannten „transhumanistischen“ Community im Silicon Valley propagiert, deren Vertreter wie der Physiker Ray Kurzweil davon ausgehen, dass wir in spätestens 30 Jahren mit KIs kommunizieren könnten, wie mit einem Menschen (Kurzweil 2005). Saudi Arabien hat 2017 bereits dem anthropomorphen Roboter mit Sprachinterface Sophia die Staatsbürgerschaft zugesprochen (Arab News 2017). Künstliche Intelligenzen wie Apples Assistenzsystem Siri oder Amazons Alexa halten derzeit Einzug in unseren Alltag. Chatbots und Social-Bots wie der Twitter-Bot Tay nehmen Einfluss auf öffentliche Diskurse und interaktives Spielzeug mit Dialogfunktion führt bereits unsere Jüngsten an die Interaktion mit dem artifiziellen Gegenüber heran. Hier entsteht eine völlig neue Form der Dialogizität, die wir aus linguistischer Perspektive noch kaum verstehen. Unabhängige Studien zur Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion stellen also ein großes Desiderat dar.
The newest generation of speech technology caused a huge increase of audio-visual data nowadays being enhanced with orthographic transcripts such as in automatic subtitling in online platforms. Research data centers and archives contain a range of new and historical data, which are currently only partially transcribed and therefore only partially accessible for systematic querying. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is one option of making that data accessible. This paper tests the usability of a state-of-the-art ASR-System on a historical (from the 1960s), but regionally balanced corpus of spoken German, and a relatively new corpus (from 2012) recorded in a narrow area. We observed a regional bias of the ASR-System with higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for the south. A detailed analysis of the narrow region data revealed – despite relatively high ASR-confidence – some specific word errors due to a lack of regional adaptation. These findings need to be considered in decisions on further data processing and the curation of corpora, e.g. correcting transcripts or transcribing from scratch. Such geography-dependent analyses can also have the potential for ASR-development to make targeted data selection for training/adaptation and to increase the sensitivity towards varieties of pluricentric languages.
We present a fine-grained NER annotations scheme with 30 labels and apply it to German data. Building on the OntoNotes 5.0 NER inventory, our scheme is adapted for a corpus of transcripts of biographic interviews by adding categories for AGE and LAN(guage) and also adding label classes for various numeric and temporal expressions. Applying the scheme to the spoken data as well as a collection of teaser tweets from newspaper sites, we can confirm its generality for both domains, also achieving good inter-annotator agreement. We also show empirically how our inventory relates to the well-established 4-category NER inventory by re-annotating a subset of the GermEval 2014 NER coarse-grained dataset with our fine label inventory. Finally, we use a BERT-based system to establish some baselines for NER tagging on our two new datasets. Global results in in-domain testing are quite high on the two datasets, near what was achieved for the coarse inventory on the CoNLLL2003 data. Cross-domain testing produces much lower results due to the severe domain differences.
This paper presents experiments on sentence boundary detection in transcripts of spoken dialogues. Segmenting spoken language into sentence-like units is a challenging task, due to disfluencies, ungrammatical or fragmented structures and the lack of punctuation. In addition, one of the main bottlenecks for many NLP applications for spoken language is the small size of the training data, as the transcription and annotation of spoken language is by far more time-consuming and labour-intensive than processing written language. We therefore investigate the benefits of data expansion and transfer learning and test different ML architectures for this task. Our results show that data expansion is not straightforward and even data from the same domain does not always improve results. They also highlight the importance of modelling, i.e. of finding the best architecture and data representation for the task at hand. For the detection of boundaries in spoken language transcripts, we achieve a substantial improvement when framing the boundary detection problem as a sentence pair classification task, as compared to a sequence tagging approach.
The newest generation of speech technology caused a huge increase of audio-visual data nowadays being enhanced with orthographic transcripts such as in automatic subtitling in online platforms. Research data centers and archives contain a range of new and historical data, which are currently only partially transcribed and therefore only partially accessible for systematic querying. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) is one option of making that data accessible. This paper tests the usability of a state-of-the-art ASR-System on a historical (from the 1960s), but regionally balanced corpus of spoken German, and a relatively new corpus (from 2012) recorded in a narrow area. We observed a regional bias of the ASR-System with higher recognition scores for the north of Germany vs. lower scores for the south. A detailed analysis of the narrow region data revealed – despite relatively high ASR-confidence – some specific word errors due to a lack of regional adaptation. These findings need to be considered in decisions on further data processing and the curation of corpora, e.g. correcting transcripts or transcribing from scratch. Such geography-dependent analyses can also have the potential for ASR-development to make targeted data selection for training/adaptation and to increase the sensitivity towards varieties of pluricentric languages.
We present the second edition of the GermEval Shared Task on the Identification of Offensive Language. This shared task deals with the classification of German tweets from Twitter. Two subtasks were continued from the first edition, namely a coarse-grained binary classification task and a fine-grained multi-class classification task. As a novel subtask, we introduce the classification of offensive tweets as explicit or implicit.
The shared task had 13 participating groups submitting 28 runs for the coarse-grained
task, another 28 runs for the fine-grained task, and 17 runs for the implicit-explicit
task.
We evaluate the results of the systems submitted to the shared task. The shared task homepage can be found at https://projects.fzai.h-da.de/iggsa/