Refine
Document Type
- Article (46)
- Part of a Book (28)
- Other (6)
Keywords
- Neologismus (55)
- COVID-19 (52)
- Sprachgebrauch (33)
- Deutsch (27)
- Wortschatz (23)
- Wörterbuch (23)
- Lexikografie (14)
- Worthäufigkeit (14)
- Pandemie (12)
- Lexikostatistik (8)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (40)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (33)
- Postprint (9)
- Ahead of Print (1)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (40)
- Peer-Review (16)
Publisher
Neologisms, i.e., new words or meanings, are finding their way into everyday language use all the time. In the process, already existing elements of a language are recombined or linguistic material from other languages is borrowed. But are borrowed neologisms accepted similarly well by the speech community as neologisms that were formed from “native” material? We investigate this question based on neologisms in German. Building on the corresponding results of a corpus study, we test the hypothesis of whether “native” neologisms are more readily accepted than those borrowed from English. To do so, we use a psycholinguistic experimental paradigm that allows us to estimate the degree of uncertainty of the participants based on the mouse trajectories of their responses. Unexpectedly, our results suggest that the neologisms borrowed from English are accepted more frequently, more quickly, and more easily than the “native” ones. These effects, however, are restricted to people born after 1980, the so-called millenials. We propose potential explanations for this mismatch between corpus results and experimental data and argue, among other things, for a reinterpretation of previous corpus studies.
Are borrowed neologisms accepted more slowly into the German language than German words resulting from the application of word formation rules? This study addresses this question by focusing on two possible indicators for the acceptance of neologisms: a) frequency development of 239 German neologisms from the 1990s (loanwords as well as new words resulting from the application of word formation rules) in the German reference corpus DeReKo and b) frequency development in the use of pragmatic markers (‘flags’, namely quotation marks and phrases such as sogenannt ‘so-called’) with these words. In the second part of the article, a psycholinguistic approach to evaluating the (psychological) status of different neologisms and non-words in an experimentally controlled study and plans to carry out interviews in a field test to collect speakers’ opinions on the acceptance of the analysed neologisms are outlined. Finally, implications for the lexicographic treatment of both types of neologisms are discussed.
Are borrowed neologisms accepted more slowly into the German language than German words resulting from the application of wrd formation rules? This study addresses this question by focusing on two possible indicators for the acceptance of neologisms: a) frequency development of 239 German neologisms from the 1990s (loanwords as well as new words resulting from the application of word formation rules) in the German reference corpus DEREKO and b) frequency development in the use of pragmatic markers (‘flags’, namely quotation marks and phrases such as sogenannt ‘so-called’) with these words. In the second part of the article, a psycholinguistic approach to evaluating the (psychological) status of different neologisms and non-words in an experimentally controlled study and plans to carry out interviews in a field test to collect speakers’ opinions on the acceptance of the analysed neologisms are outlined. Finally, implications for the lexicographic treatment of both types of neologisms are discussed.
T-Shirt Lexicography
(2020)
This article presents a study of graphic inscriptions on garments such as T-shirts, inscriptions that resemble entries in general monolingual dictionaries of German. Referred to here as "T-shirt lexicography," the collected material is analyzed in terms of its form, content, and function, focusing on lexicographical aspects. T-shirt lexicography is an example of vernacular lexicography inasmuch as different lexicographical traditions are assumed (correctly as well as erroneously) by the (unknown) authors, but also adapted to their specific needs.
In this article, we provide an insight into the development and application of a corpus-lexicographic tool for finding neologisms that are not yet listed in German dictionaries. As a starting point, we used the words listed in a glossary of German neologisms surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. These words are lemma candidates for a new dictionary on COVID-19 discourse in German. They also provided the database used to develop and test the NeoRate tool. We report on the lexicographic work in our dictionary project, the design and functionalities of NeoRate, and describe the first test results with the tool, in particular with regard to previously unregistered words. Finally, we discuss further development of the tool and its possible applications.
In der Berichterstattung über die Coronapandemie werden einige für den deutschen Allgemeinwortschatz neue Wörter sowie bekannte Wörter mit neuen Bedeutungen verwendet. Manche sind aus dem Englischen entlehnt, andere im Deutschen gebildet. Neben etwas älteren Lexemen stehen ganz neue, neben solchen aus bestimmten Fachsprachen solche, die außerhalb von Fachkontexten entstanden sind. Sie erscheinen uns alle erklärenswert, selbst, wenn wir sie für das Neologismenwörterbuch zunächst noch beobachten.
Lexikographische und lexikalische Ressourcen zum Deutschen werden an vielen unterschiedlichen Institutionen erarbeitet. Zum einen im Dudenverlag, der mit den gedruckten Wörterbüchern der Duden-Reihe und mit „Duden online“ die meistkonsultierten gegenwartssprachlichen Wörterbücher zum Deutschen erstellt, dann die Union deutscher Akademien, unter deren Dach an verschiedenen einzelnen Akademien zahlreiche historische wie auch synchrone Wörterbücher zum Deutschen erstellt werden (z. B. das „Digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache“, das „Wörterbuchnetz“ sowie das geplante Informationssystem des neuen „Zentrums für digitale Lexikographie der deutschen Sprache“). Auch am Institut für Deutsche Sprache in Mannheim werden wissenschaftliche wortschatzbezogene Ressourcen zum Deutschen erarbeitet und der (Fach-)Öffentlichkeit unter dem Dach von OWID, dem „Online-Wortschatz-Informationssystem Deutsch“, präsentiert. Obwohl wir uns in OWID auf Ressourcen zu spezialisierten Wortschatzbereichen konzentriert haben, erreichen wir Nutzerinnen und Nutzer in verschiedensten Ländern der Welt. Wir wollen hier die Gelegenheit wahrnehmen, den ZGL-Leserinnen und -Lesern unsere Ressourcen in OWID und OWIDplus näher vorzustellen.
Hier sehen Sie neue Wörter sowie bekannte Wörter mit neuen Bedeutungen, die seit Beginn der COVID-19-Pandemie aufgekommen sind, bei denen wir aber noch beobachten, ob sie eine gewisse Verbreitung in die Allgemeinsprache erfahren werden. Zu jedem dieser Wörter geben wir eine (vorläufige, grobe) Bedeutungserläuterung an und illustrieren die Verwendung mit 1-2 Belegen.
This is an introduction to a special issue of Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America. It offers a characterization of neology and describes the Globalex-sponsored workshop at which the papers in the issue originated. It provides an overview of the papers, which treat lexicographical neology and neological lexicography in Danish, Dutch, Estonian, Frisian, Greek, Korean, Spanish, and Swahili and address relevant aspects of lexicography in those languages, presenting state-of-the-art research into neology and ideas about modern lexicographic treatment of neologisms in various dictionary types.
This volume of Lexicographica : Series Maior focuses on lexicographic neology and neological lexicography concerning COVID-19 neologisms, featuring papers originally presented at the third Globalex Workshop on Lexicography and Neology (GWLN 2021).
The thirteen papers in this volume focus on ten languages: one Altaic (Korean), one Finno-Ugric (Hungarian), two Germanic (English and German), four Romance (French, Italian, [Brazilian and European] Portuguese and [Pan-American and European] Spanish), and one Slavic (Croatian), as well as the Sign Language of New Zealand. Specialized dictionaries of neologisms are discussed as well as general language ones, monolingual, bilingual and multilingual lexical resources, print and electronic dictionaries. Questions regarding terminology as well as general language and standard and norm regarding COVID-19 neologisms are raised and different methods of detecting candidates in media corpora, as well as by user contributions, are discussed.
This introduction summarizes general issues combining lexicography and neology in the context of the Globalex Workshop on Lexicography and Neology series. We present each of the six papers composing this Special Issue, featuring two Slavic languages (Czech and Slovak) and two Romance ones (Brazilian Portuguese and Spanish in its European and Latin American varieties) and their diverse lexicographic research and representation, in specialized dictionaries of neologisms or general language ones, in monolingual, bilingual and multilingual lexical resources, and in print and digital dictionaries.
Hier sehen Sie neue Wörter sowie bekannte Wörter mit neuen Bedeutungen, die seit Beginn der COVID-19-Pandemie aufgekommen sind, bei denen wir aber noch beobachten, ob sie eine gewisse Verbreitung in die Allgemeinsprache erfahren werden. Zu jedem dieser Wörter geben wir eine (vorläufige, grobe) Bedeutungserläuterung an und illustrieren die Verwendung mit 1-2 Belegen.
Maske oder Mundschutz?
(2020)
Shutdown, Lockdown und Exit
(2020)
Von Nichtstun und Erholung (an Weihnachten und zu anderen Zeiten) (aus der Rubrik Neuer Wortschatz)
(2020)
Von Gummistiefelmomenten
(2020)
Corona- und andere Partys
(2020)
This paper discusses German neologisms in the so-called “new-media” and presents a German corpus-based online dictionary of neologisms. Several neological morphemes and lexemes, as well as their meaning will be presented, showing that these new modes of communication are an important source of enrichment of German lexicon.
Neuer Wortschatz
(2019)
Technische Innovationen, historische Ereignisse, sich wandelnde gesellschaftliche Gegebenheiten
oder politische Neuerungen – für eine funktionierende Verständigung muss sich
der Wortschatz ständig anpassen. Da kann es schnell passieren, dass man ein Wort hört oder
liest, das man noch nicht kennt oder bei dem man sich unsicher ist, wie man es schreibt oder
spricht. Und beim Nachschlagen in einem Wörterbuch, das neue Wörter verzeichnet, stellen
sich weitere Fragen: Welche Quellen werden für ein solches Neologismenwörterbuch ausgewertet,
wie kommt ein Wort dort hinein, und ab wann gilt es als gut integriert? Welche
Typen von Neologismen gibt es eigentlich?
Vorwort
(2021)