Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (182)
- Article (178)
- Book (55)
- Working Paper (10)
- Conference Proceeding (9)
- Part of Periodical (8)
- Doctoral Thesis (4)
- Review (3)
- Habilitation (1)
- Report (1)
Language
- German (293)
- English (138)
- French (16)
- Multiple languages (3)
- Polish (1)
Keywords
- Konversationsanalyse (451) (remove)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (208)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (62)
- Postprint (48)
- Ahead of Print (2)
Reviewstate
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (164)
- Peer-Review (132)
- Peer-review (5)
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (4)
- Verlags-Lektorat (2)
- (Verlags-)lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (43)
- Narr (38)
- de Gruyter (30)
- Benjamins (25)
- Lang (14)
- Narr Francke Attempto (14)
- Taylor & Francis (14)
- Elsevier (12)
- Stauffenburg (12)
- Winter (12)
Im Dialog übernehmen Sprecher fortlaufend Wörter, grammatische Konstruktionen und andere sprachliche Strukturen ihrer Gesprächsteilnehmer. Die vorliegende Studie widmet sich diesem Phänomen der dialogischen Resonanz aus drei verschiedenen Blickwinkeln: aus der Sicht der Dialogischen Syntax von Du Bois, der Kognitiven Grammatik Langackers und der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Anhand von Resonanzsequenzen aus dem österreichischen Parlament wird zunächst die strukturelle und funktionale Breite und Varianz der dialogischen Resonanzherstellung auf verschiedenen sprachlichen Ebenen beleuchtet. In einem zweiten Schritt stehen die der Resonanzherstellung unterliegenden kognitiven Mechanismen im Mittelpunkt. Dabei geht die Studie explizit paradigmenübergreifend vor und kombiniert Methoden der Gesprächsanalyse mit Theorien und Konzepten der Kognitiven Linguistik. In diesem Sinne situiert sich die Studie in dem noch jungen Feld der Interaktionalen Kognitiven Linguistik, deren Potenzial, aber auch deren Grenzen abschließend kritisch diskutiert werden.
Die gesprächsanalytische Studie untersucht Gespräche im Spannungsfeld von institutioneller und interkultureller Kommunikation. Dazu werden Interaktionen zwischen deutschen Polizeibeamten und Immigranten, die nicht über muttersprachliche Kenntnisse des Deutschen verfügen, in natürlichen Zeugen- und Beschuldigtenvernehmungen sowie Erst-Kontakt-Situationen an der Anmeldung der Polizeiinspektion analysiert. Die Interaktionen werden zum einen auf institutioneller Ebene hinsichtlich der Asymmetrien sowie dem Umgang der Beteiligten mit den für die Institution typischen Schemata untersucht. Zum anderen rücken auf interkultureller Ebene die Verstehenssicherung und kulturbedingte Kommunikationsstörungen in den Fokus. Dabei zeigt sich, dass die Klienten teilweise über ein (kulturell) anderes Rahmenwissen verfügen und sich daher Divergenzen hinsichtlich des Verständnisses des Kommunikationstyps ‚Vernehmung‘ zwischen Beamten und Klienten auftun.
Meaning in interaction
(2024)
This editorial to the Special Issue on “Meaning in Interaction” introduces to the approach of Interactional Semantics, which has been developed over the last years within the framework of Interactional Linguistics. It discusses how “meaning” is understood and approached in this framework and lays out that Interactional Semantics is interested in how participants clarify and negotiate the meanings of the expressions that they are using in social interaction. Commonalities and differences of this approach with other approaches to meaning are flagged, and the intellectual origins and precursors of Interactional Semantics are introduced. The contributions to the Special Issue are located in the larger field of research.
Fragen, meist mit systemisch-lösungsorientiertem Hintergrund, gelten im Coaching als Königsweg für den Erfolg. Entsprechend ist eine große Anzahl an Publikationen entstanden, die diese zentrale Intervention in den Blick nehmen. In dieser Praxisliteratur werden Fragen dabei oftmals rezeptartig nach Typus, Funktion und möglichen Anwendungskontexten wie etwa Phasen geordnet sowie anhand dekontextualisierter Beispiele beschrieben. Fragen, die in Praxis- und Lehrbuchsammlungen aufgenommen wurden, sind aus der Theorie hergeleitet und in der Praxis erprobt. Allerdings finden sich in dieser Literatur auch empirisch nicht haltbare Aussagen wie etwa die negative Bewertung geschlossener Fragen. Außerdem stellt ihre dekontextualisierte Darstellungsform insbesondere für unerfahrene Coaches eine Herausforderung bei der Umsetzung ins konkrete Coaching-Handeln dar: Fragen sind immer eingebettet in einen Kontext und müssen auf die Anwesenden, die jeweilige kommunikative Interaktion mit ihnen sowie die lokale sequenzielle Struktur des Gesprächs übersetzt werden. Die wissenschaftliche Überprüfung, wie diese Fragensammlungen im Coaching (erfolgreich) ein- und umgesetzt werden, ist dabei insgesamt noch ganz am Anfang. Der vorliegende Beitrag berichtet von einem aktuellen interdisziplinären Forschungsprojekt, das Fragen in den empirischen Blick nimmt und dabei einen Übergang von Eminenz zur Evidenz ermöglicht. Der Beitrag liefert auch Ideen und Anregungen für Coaches, diese Übersetzungsarbeit zu leisten.
Mit den Methoden der Interaktionalen Linguistik und der Konversationsanalyse untersucht die vorliegende Arbeit syntaktische Ko-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch, wobei der Fokus auf Vervollständigungen eines zweiten Sprechers vor einem möglichen syntaktischen Abschlusspunkt liegt. Auf der Basis von 199 Ko-Konstruktionen aus informellen Interviews und Tischgesprächen leistet die Arbeit eine erste umfassende Analyse der gemeinsamen Konstruktion einer syntaktischen Gestalt durch zwei Sprecher im Deutschen.
Die Struktur der Ko-Konstruktionen wird in einem ersten Schritt über die Basisoperationen der Online-Syntax, Projektion und Retraktion, beschrieben. Im Fokus steht hier die Frage, an welchen Projektionen sich der zweite Sprecher orientiert, wobei sowohl syntaktische und prosodische als auch semanto-pragmatische Aspekte in die Analyse miteinbezogen werden. In einem zweiten Schritt wird die zeitliche und sequenzielle Organisation der Ko-Konstruktionen detailliert herausgearbeitet. Ein Schwerpunkt liegt hier auf einer genauen Darstellung und Analyse der verschiedenen Handlungsoptionen des ersten Sprechers nach der ko-konstruierten Vervollständigung.
Rejecting the validity of inferred attributions of incompetence in German talk-in-interaction
(2024)
This paper deals with pragmatic inference from the perspective of Conversation Analysis. In particular, we examine a specific variety of inferences - the attribution of incompetence which Self constructs on the basis of Other's prior action, hearable as positioning Self as incompetent (e.g., instructions, offers of assistance, advice); this attribution of incompetence concerns Self's execution of some practical task. This inference is indexed in Self's response, which highlights Self's expertise, or competence concerning the task at hand. We focus on two recurrent types of such responses in our data: (i) accounting for competence through formulations of prior experience with carrying out a practical action and (ii) explicit claims of competence for accomplishing this action. We analyze the interactional environments in which these responses occur, the ways in which the two practices index Self's understanding of being positioned as incompetent and the interactional work they do. Finally, we discuss how through rejecting and inferred attribution of incompetence, Self implicitly seeks to restore their face and defend their autonomy as an agent, yet, without entering an explicit identity-negotiation. Findings rest on the analysis of 20 cases found in video-recordings of naturally occurring talk-in-interaction in German from the corpus FOLK.
Das Beispiel ist seit der Antike ein zentraler Gegenstand der abendländischen Diskussion. In dieser ersten umfassenden Monographie zur Linguistik des Beispiels wird deshalb eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive entfaltet, in der Ansätze aus Rhetorik, Philosophie, Pädagogik und Psychologie sowie linguistischen Ansätze zur Beispielforschung behandelt werden. Die sprachwissenschaftliche Beschäftigung mit Beispielen blieb bisher jedoch ein Randphänomen, obwohl Praktiken der Beispielverwendung in der Alltagskommunikation allgegenwärtig sind.
Orientiert an ›grounded theory‹, linguistischer Hermeneutik und Handlungssemantik wird hier ein Beispielbegriff erarbeitet, demzufolge das Beispielverwenden eine komplexe Form sprachlichen Handelns und eine fundamentale menschliche Denkbewegung darstellt, die darin besteht, einen Konnex zwischen Besonderem und Allgemeinem zu konstituieren. Hierauf basierend werden Beispiele anhand eines umfangreichen Korpus von Gesprächsdaten analysiert und kommunikative Muster, sprachliche Realisierungsformen sowie Funktionen des Beispielverwendens in der Interaktion herausgearbeitet.
It is a ubiquitous phenomenon of everyday interaction that participants confront their co-participants for behaviour that they assess as undesirable or in some other way untoward. In a set of video data of informal interaction from the PECII corpus (Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction), cases of such sanctions have been collected in English, German, Italian and Polish data. This study presents work in progress and focuses on interrogatively formatted sanctions, in particular on non-polar interrogatives. It has already been shown that interrogatives can do much more than ask questions (Huddleston 1994). They can also function as directives (Lindström et al. 2017) or, more specifically, as requests (Curl/Drew 2008), as invitations (Margutti/Galatolo 2018) or reproaches (Klattenberg 2021), among others. What makes them interesting for cross-linguistic comparison is that the four languages that are considered provide different morphological and (morpho-)syntactical ressources for the realization of interrogative phrases. For example, German provides the option of building in the modal particle denn that reveals a previous lack of clarity and obliges the co-participant(s) to deliver the missing information (Deppermann 2009). Of course, the other three languages have modal particles, too (e.g. allora in Italian or though in English), but they do not seem to convey the same semantic and interactional qualities as denn. From an interactional point of view, one could think that interrogatives are a typical and effective way of solliciting accounts, since formally they open up a conditionally relevant space for an answer or a
reaction. But as the data shows, this does not guarantee that they are actually responded to. Another relevant aspect in the context of sanctions is that the interrogative format seems to carry a certain ‚openness‘ that might be seen as a mitigating effect and thus provides an interesting point of comparison with other mitigating devices. This study uses the methods of conversation analysis and interactional linguistics. It is based on a collection of 148 interrogative sanctions (out of which 84 are non-polar interrogatives) covering the four languages. I draw on coded data from roughly 1000 cases to get a first overall idea of how the interrogative format might differ from other formats, and how it might interrelate with specific features – for example, if subsequently an account is delivered. Going more into depth, the interrogative sanctions will then be analyzed with respect to their formal design (e.g. polar questions vs. content questions vs. tag questions, Rossano 2010; Hayano 2013) and to their pragmatic implications. I also analyze reactions to such sanctions – both formally (cf. Enfield et al. 2019, 279) and, again, from an interactional perspective (e.g. acceptance/compliance vs. challenging/defiance; Kent 2012; Cekaite 2020). A more detailed zooming in on the sequential unfolding of some particularly interesting
instances of sanctioning interrogatives will make the picture complete.
The ubiquity of smartphones has been recognised within conversation analysis as having an impact on conversational structures and on the participants’ interactional involvement. However, most of the previous studies have relied exclusively on video recordings of overall encounters and have not systematically considered what is taking place on the device. Due to the personal nature of smartphones and their small displays, onscreen activities are of limited visibility and are thus potentially opaque for both the co-present participants (“participant opacity”) and the researchers (“analytical opacity”). While opacity can be an inherent feature of smartphones in general, analytical opacity might not be desirable for research purposes. This chapter discusses how a recording set-up consisting of static cameras, wearable cameras and dynamic screen captures allowed us to address the analytical opacity of mobile devices. Excerpts from multi-source video data of everyday encounters will illustrate how the combination of multiple perspectives can increase the visibility of interactional phenomena, reveal new analytical objects and improve analytical granularity. More specifically, these examples will emphasise the analytical advantages and challenges of a combined recording set-up with regard to smartphone use as multiactivity, the role of the affordances of the mobile device, and the prototypicality and “naturalness” of the recorded practices.
Interactants who encounter co-participant conduct which they find to be socio-normatively problematic or troublesome are faced with a range of choices. First and foremost, this includes the issue of whether to directly address it, or to simply ‘let it pass’ (at least for now) (Emerson/Messinger 1977). In the case of the former, the issue then becomes how to address it. Across the various ways in which participants can pragmatically engage with what they perceive to be transgressive or untoward behavior (e.g., Pomerantz 1978; Schegloff 1988b; Dersley/Wootton 2000; Günthner 2000; Bolden/Robinson 2011; Potter/Hepburn 2020; see also Rodriguez 2022), they sometimes meta-pragmatically formulate the co-participant’s doings in terms of specific actions. Such action descriptions are necessarily selective (Sacks 1963; Schegloff 1972, 1988a; Sidnell/Barnes 2013): They foreground certain aspects of the co-participant’s conduct, while backgrounding others, and thus contribute to publically construeing the formulated conduct in particular ways (Jayyusi 1993), viz. as socio-normatively problematic, transgressive or untoward, and interactionally accountable (Robinson 2016; Sidnell 2017).
In this presentation I show first results from an ongoing study about syntactic complexity of sanctioning turns in spoken language. This study is part of a larger project on sanctioning of misconduct in social interaction in different European languages (English, German, Italian and Polish). For the study I use video recordings of different everyday settings (family breakfasts, board game interactions and car rides) with three or four participants. These data come from the Parallel European Corpus of Informal Interaction (Kornfeld/Küttner/Zinken 2023; Küttner et al. submitted). I focus on sanctioning turns with more than one turn-constructional unit (see among others for TCUs: Sacks/Schegloff/Jefferson 1974; Clayman 2013). The study asks how often TCUs are linked to each other in the different languages, for what function, and how language diversity enters into this. Note that complex sanctioning turns do not always come as complex sentences.
From June 26th to July 2nd 2023 the International Conference on Conversation Analysis (ICCA) took place in Brisbane/Meanjin, Australia – after a long pause due to the Covid-pandemic and for the first time in the southern hemisphere. About 350 participants from about 50 different countries attended the conference. This year’s ICCA came up with 36 panels and about 300 papers that were presented. Four plenary speakers have been invited and 24 pre-conference workshops took place. On Wednesday evening Ilana Mushin, in her role as conference chair, officially opened ICCA. The President of the International Society of Conversation Analysis (ISCA), Tanya Stivers, also welcomed all participants. To get acquainted with the indigenous culture of Queensland, the opening ceremony was enriched with a highly impressive dance performance by First Nations people. After the official inauguration the international community met at the Welcome Reception to look forward together to the days ahead with many opportunities for exchange and networking.
As it will become clear throughout this report, the research topics revolved around not only classic CA concepts, but also importantly concerned embodiment, which continued the line of past conferences (Dix 2019). Another aspect that has been highlighted was conflict and social norms. Due to personal capacities, we can only present a selection of presentations within the scope of this conference report. The selection was influenced by the personal interest of the authors and should not be understood as rating in any sense.
This study investigates other-initiated repair and its embodied dimension in casual English as lingua franca (ELF) conversations, thereby contributing to the further understanding of multimodal repair practices in social interaction. Using multimodal conversation analysis, we focus on two types of restricted other-initiation of repair (OIR): partial repeats preceded or followed by the question word what (i.e., what X?/X what?) and copular interrogative clauses (i.e., what is X). Partial repeats with what produced with rising final intonation are consistently accompanied by a head poke and treated as relating to troubles in hearing, with the repair usually consisting of a repeat. In contrast to these partial repeats, copular interrogative clauses are produced with downward final intonation and accompanied by face-related embodied conduct. The what is X OIRs primarily target code-switched lexical items, the understanding of which is critical for maintaining the repair initiator’s involvement in the ongoing sequence. This study also contributes some general reflections on the possible complexity of OIR and repair practices from a multimodal perspective.
In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird mit ethnografischen, gesprächsanalytischen und gesprächsrhetorischen Methoden der kommunikative Sozialstil der "emanzipatorischen Migranten" untersucht. Ein wesentliches Kennzeichen dieses Milieus von Migranten der zweiten Generation ist, dass seine Akteure offensiv und provokativ mit Rassismen umgehen und sich nicht ethnisch (als "Türken", "Italiener", "Griechen" etc.) definieren. Des Weiteren betrachten sie - neben der dominanten Verwendung des Deutschen als gruppeninterner Kommunikationssprache - (deutschtürkisches) Code-switching und Code-mixing als wichtigen Ausdruck ihrer migrantischen Identität.
Da Potenziale und Konturen von Stilen erst im Kontrast eindeutig hervortreten, werden diese Befunde mit der kommunikativen Praxis einer anderen Sozialwelt von Migranten der zweiten Generation verglichen, derjenigen der "akademischen Europatürken". Hierbei zeigt sich, dass dieses sich ethnisch und als "Elite" der türkischen Migranten definierende Milieu moderat auf Diskriminierungen reagiert und deutsch-türkische Sprachvariation als Ausdruck von "Halbsprachigkeit" ablehnt.
This manual introduces a conversation analytically informed coding scheme for episodes involving the direct social sanctioning of problem behavior in informal social interaction which was developed in the project Norms, Rules, and Morality across Languages (NoRM-aL) at the Leibniz-Institute for the German Language. It outlines the background for its development, delimits the phenomena to which the coding scheme can be applied and provides instructions for its use.
The scheme asks for basic information about the recording and the participants involved in the episode, before taking stock of different features of the sanctioning episode as a whole. This is followed by sets of specific coding questions about the sanctioning move itself (such as its timing and composition) and the reaction it engenders. The coding enables researchers to get a bird’s eye view on recurrent features of such episodes in larger quantities of data and allows for comparisons across different languages and informal settings.
Die Untersuchung präsentiert die multimodale Struktur und Komplexität eines besonderen Kooperationstyps, dem »Pitching«. Das Pitching ist eine Mischform aus Arbeits- und Lehr-Lern-Diskurs, bei der vier Studierende gemeinsam mit zwei Dozenten Filmideen entwickeln. Als empirische Grundlage dient ein Datenkorpus von 72 Stunden Videoaufnahmen, das methodisch mit einer Kombination aus ethnographischer Gesprächsanalyse, ethnomethodologischer Konversationsanalyse und deren Erweiterung um eine multimodale Analyseperspektive untersucht wird. Dabei wird detailliert der komplexe Gesamtzusammenhang von Verbalität, Mimik, Gestik, Körperpositur und anderen körperlichen Ausdruckformen in seiner Bedeutung für die gemeinsame Arbeit ersichtlich. Basierend auf den beiden zentralen Konzepten »Kooperation« und »Handlungsschema« werden die spezifischen Situationsmerkmale des Pitchings und die typischen Aufgaben und Probleme rekonstruiert, die von den Interaktionsbeteiligten durch unterschiedliche Verfahren bearbeitet werden. Aufgrund einer longitudinalen Perspektive gibt die Untersuchung zudem Einblicke in die Professionalisierung der Studierenden im Studienverlauf.
This paper examines multi-unit turns that allow speakers to retrospectively close the prior sequence while prospectively launching a new sequence, which Schegloff (1986) referred to as interlocking organization. Using English telephone conversations as data, we focus on how multi-unit turns are used for topic shifts, and show that interlocking organization operates in conjunction with other phonetic and lexical features, such as increased pitch and overt markers of disjunction (e.g., “listen”). In addition, speakers utilize an audible inbreath that is placed between the first and the second units as a central interactional resource to project further talk, thereby suppressing speaker transition and possibly highlighting the action delivered in the second unit as being distinctly new. We propose that interlocking multi-unit turns, when used to make topically disjunctive moves, promote progressivity by avoiding a possible lapse in turn transition
We present a collection of (currently) about 5.500 commands directed to voice-controlled virtual assistants (VAs) by sixteen initial users of a VA system in their homes. The collection comprises recordings captured by the VA itself and with a conditional voice recorder (CVR) selectively capturing recordings including the VA-directed commands plus some surrounding context. Next to a description of the collection, we present initial findings on the patterns of use of the VA systems during the first weeks after installation, including usage timing, the development of usage frequency, distributions of sentence structures across commands, and (the development of) command success rates. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the applied collection-specific recording approach and describe potential research questions that can be investigated in the future, based on the collection, as well as the merit of combining quantitative corpus linguistic approaches with qualitative in-depth analyses of single cases.
This article investigates mundane photo taking practices with personal mobile devices in the co-presence of others, as well as “divergent” self-initiated smartphone use, thereby exploring the impact of everyday technologies on social interaction. Utilizing multimodal conversation analysis, we examined sequences in which young adults take pictures of food and drinks in restaurants and cafés. Although everyday interactions are abundant in opportunities for accomplishing food photography as a side activity, our data show that taking pictures is also often prioritized over other activities. Through a detailed sequential analysis of video recordings and dynamic screen captures of mobile devices, we illustrate how photographers orient to the momentary opportunities for and relevance of photo taking, that is, how they systematically organize their photographing with respect to the ongoing social encounter and the (projected) changes in the material environment. We investigate how the participants multimodally negotiate the “mainness” and “sideness” (Mondada, 2014) of situated food photography and describe some particular features of participants’ conduct in moments of mundane multiactivity.
The Encyclopedia of Terminology for Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics is an online resource for students and scholars of CA/IL, publicly available on the EMCA Wiki page. Encyclopedias and glossaries are widespread across various fields and methods, and serve as immensely valuable resources. Given the extent to which the EMCA/IL community has expanded over the years—both terminologically as well as geographically—we hope that this encyclopedia of terminology will be well received by students and practitioners of CA and IL across the globe.