Open Access

This dissertation investigates discourse-pragmatic differences between variably linked arguments appearing in alternating argument structure constructions in the sense of Goldberg (1995) and Kay (manuscript). The properties that are studied include givenness, pragmatic relation (topic/focus), salience of referents, animacy, and others. They derive from the literature on sentence-type constructions such as topicalization and from research on the referential properties of NP form types. The research carried out here has multiple uses. At the most basic level, it serves as an empirical check on existing characterizations of the pragmatic properties of the relevant arguments that are the result of syntactic and semantic analysis based on introspection alone. For instance, for the epistemic raising alternation involving verbs like seem, the predicted topicality difference between the subjects of the raised and unraised constructions (Langacker 1995) could not be confirmed. This dissertation also addresses the question what kinds of pragmatic factors, if any, are relevant to argument structure constructions. Based on the evidence of the dative alternation, it does not seem to be the case that the kind of pragmatic influences on argument structure constructions are different or limited compared to the ones found to be relevant to sentence-type constructions. The kind of research undertaken here can also inform the syntactic and semantic analysis of constructions. In the case of the dative alternation, the discourse-pragmatic characteristics of the variably linked arguments provide evidence that Basilico’s (1998) analysis of the difference between the alternates in terms of VP-shells and a difference between thetic and categorical ‘inner’ predication, on the one hand does not account for all the data and on the other can be re-stated in pragmatic terms other than the thetic-categorical distinction. In addition to studies of valence alternations, this dissertation also discusses various null instantiation phenomena, which provide further evidence for the need to specify discourse-pragmatic properties as part of argument structure constructions and lexical entries. Finally, it is suggested that the use of randomly sampled corpus data and statistical modelling throughout this dissertation improves both empirical and analytical coverage.

This paper presents how corpus statistics can be used to verify complex inflectional paradigms. This will be demonstrated using a set of traditionally assumed inflectional paradigms of third person personal pronouns in Polish.

We present a corpus-driven approach to the study of multi-word expressions, which constitute a significant part of. As a data basis, we use collocation profiles computed from DeReKo (Deutsches Referenzkorpus), the largest available collection of written German which has approximately two billion word tokens and is located at the Institute for the German Language (IDS). We employ a strongly usage-based approach to multi-word expressions, which we think of as conventionalised patterns in language use that manifest themselves in recurrent syntagmatic patterns of words. They are defined by their distinct function in language. To find multi-word expressions, we allow ourselves to be guided by corpus data and statistical evidence as much as possible, making interpretative steps carefully and in a monitored fashion. We develop a procedure of interpretation that leads us from the evidence of collocation profiles to a collection of recurrent word patterns and finally to multi-word expressions. When building up a collection of multi-word expressions in this fashion, it becomes clear that the expressions can be defined on different levels of generalisation and are interrelated in various ways. This will be reflected in the documentation and presentation of the findings. We are planning to add annotation in a way that allows grouping the multi-word expressions according to different features and to add links between them to reflect their relationships, thus constructing a network of multi-word expressions.

Es gibt viele linguistische Forschungsfragen, für deren Beantwortung man Korpusdaten qualitativ und quantitativ auswerten möchte. Beide Auswertungsmethoden können sich auf den Korpustext, aber auch auf Annotationsebenen beziehen. Jede Art von Annotation, also Kategorisierung, stellt einen kontrollierten und notwendigen Informationsverlust dar. Das bedeutet, dass jede Art von Kategorisierung auch eine Interpretation der Daten ist. In den meisten großen Korpora wird zu jeder vorgesehenen Annotationsebene, wie z. B. Wortart-Ebene oder Lemma-Ebene, genau eine Interpretation angeboten. In den letzten Jahren haben sich neben den großen, ,,flach“ annotierten Korpora Korpusmodelle herausgebildet, mit denen man konfligierende Informationen kodieren kann, die so genannten Mehrebenen-Modelle (multilevel standoff corpora), in denen alle Annotationsebenen unabhängig vom Text gespeichert werden und nur auf bestimmte Textanker verweisen. Ich argumentiere anhand der Fehlerannotation in einem Lernerkorpus dafür, dass zumindest Korpora, in denen es stark variierende Annotationsbedürfnisse und umstrittene Analysen geben kann, davon profitieren, in Mehrebenen-Modellen kodiert zu werden.

The article investigates the conditions under which the w-relativizer was appears instead of the d-relativzer das in German relative clauses. Building on Wiese 2013, we argue that was constitutes the elsewhere case that applies when identification with the antecedent cannot be established by syntactic means via upward agreement with respect to phi-features. Corpuslinguistic results point to the conclusion that this is the case whenever there is no lexical nominal in the antecedent that, following Geach 1962 and Baker 2003, supplies a criterion of identity needed to establish sameness of reference between the antecedent and the relativizer.

The author presents a study using eye-tracking-while-reading data from participants reading German jurisdictional texts. I am particularly interested in nominalisations. It can be shown that nominalisations are read significantly longer than other nouns and that this effect is quite strong. Furthermore, the results suggest that nouns are read faster in reformulated texts. In the reformulations, nominalisations were transformed into verbal structures. Reformulations did not lead to increased processing times of verbal constructions but reformulated texts were read faster overall. Where appropriate, results are compared to a previous study of Hansen et al. (2006) using the same texts but other methodology and statistical analysis.

In the NLP literature, adapting a parser to new text with properties different from the training data is commonly referred to as domain adaptation. In practice, however, the differences between texts from different sources often reflect a mixture of domain and genre properties, and it is by no means clear what impact each of those has on statistical parsing. In this paper, we investigate how differences between articles in a newspaper corpus relate to the concepts of genre and domain and how they influence parsing performance of a transition-based dependency parser. We do this by applying various similarity measures for data point selection and testing their adequacy for creating genre-aware parsing models.

Languages employ different strategies to transmit structural and grammatical information. While, for example, grammatical dependency relationships in sentences are mainly conveyed by the ordering of the words for languages like Mandarin Chinese, or Vietnamese, the word ordering is much less restricted for languages such as Inupiatun or Quechua, as these languages (also) use the internal structure of words (e.g. inflectional morphology) to mark grammatical relationships in a sentence. Based on a quantitative analysis of more than 1,500 unique translations of different books of the Bible in almost 1,200 different languages that are spoken as a native language by approximately 6 billion people (more than 80% of the world population), we present large-scale evidence for a statistical trade-off between the amount of information conveyed by the ordering of words and the amount of information conveyed by internal word structure: languages that rely more strongly on word order information tend to rely less on word structure information and vice versa. Or put differently, if less information is carried within the word, more information has to be spread among words in order to communicate successfully. In addition, we find that–despite differences in the way information is expressed–there is also evidence for a trade-off between different books of the biblical canon that recurs with little variation across languages: the more informative the word order of the book, the less informative its word structure and vice versa. We argue that this might suggest that, on the one hand, languages encode information in very different (but efficient) ways. On the other hand, content-related and stylistic features are statistically encoded in very similar ways.

Sprecher haben (oft unbewusste) Meinungen und Einstellungen zu Sprachen und Varietäten. Ein Weg, solche Spracheinstellungen zu erfassen, führt über quantitative Verfahren (Fragebogen mit offenen und geschlossenen Fragen), mit denen man Daten großer Gruppen – im Idealfall repräsentativ – erheben kann. Im Beitrag werden solche Erhebungen, die am Institut für Deutsche Sprache durchgeführt wurden, vorgestellt, und es werden zwei Instrumente der Spracheinstellungsforschung, die dabei zum Einsatz kamen, naher erläutert: das Allgemeine Sprachbewertungsinstrument (ASBI) und die Attitudes-Towards-Languages-Skala (AToL). Außerdem wird gezeigt, wie dialektometrische Auswertungs- und Visualisierungsverfahren auf Einstellungsdaten angewendet werden können.