Refine
Document Type
- Article (3)
- Book (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (5)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (5)
Keywords
- Deutsch (5)
- Interaktion (4)
- Konversationsanalyse (4)
- German (2)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (2)
- Modalverb (2)
- request (2)
- Attribution (1)
- Aufforderung (1)
- Autonomie (1)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (5) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (4)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Benjamins (1)
- Elsevier B.V. (1)
- Frontiers Media SA (1)
- IDS-Verlag (1)
- Verlag für Gesprächsforschung (1)
Research on multimodal interaction has shown that simultaneity of embodied behavior and talk is constitutive for social action. In this study, we demonstrate different temporal relationships between verbal and embodied actions. We focus on uses of German darf/kann ich? (“may/can I?”) in which speakers initiate, or even complete the embodied action that is addressed by the turn before the recipient’s response. We argue that through such embodied conduct, the speaker bodily enacts high agency, which is at odds with the low deontic stance they express through their darf/kann ich?-TCUs. In doing so, speakers presuppose that the intersubjective permissibility of the action is highly probable or even certain. Moreover, we demonstrate how the speaker’s embodied action, joint perceptual salience of referents, and the projectability of the action addressed with darf/kann ich? allow for a lean syntactic design of darf/kann ich?-TCUs (i.e., pronominalization, object omission, and main verb omission). Our findings underscore the reflexive relationship between lean syntax, sequential organization and multimodal conduct.
Rejecting the validity of inferred attributions of incompetence in German talk-in-interaction
(2024)
This paper deals with pragmatic inference from the perspective of Conversation Analysis. In particular, we examine a specific variety of inferences - the attribution of incompetence which Self constructs on the basis of Other's prior action, hearable as positioning Self as incompetent (e.g., instructions, offers of assistance, advice); this attribution of incompetence concerns Self's execution of some practical task. This inference is indexed in Self's response, which highlights Self's expertise, or competence concerning the task at hand. We focus on two recurrent types of such responses in our data: (i) accounting for competence through formulations of prior experience with carrying out a practical action and (ii) explicit claims of competence for accomplishing this action. We analyze the interactional environments in which these responses occur, the ways in which the two practices index Self's understanding of being positioned as incompetent and the interactional work they do. Finally, we discuss how through rejecting and inferred attribution of incompetence, Self implicitly seeks to restore their face and defend their autonomy as an agent, yet, without entering an explicit identity-negotiation. Findings rest on the analysis of 20 cases found in video-recordings of naturally occurring talk-in-interaction in German from the corpus FOLK.
Schegloff (1996) has argued that grammars are “positionally-sensitive”, implying that the situated use and understanding of linguistic formats depends on their sequential position. Analyzing the German format Kannst du X? (corresponding to English Can you X?) based on 82 instances from a large corpus of talk-in-interaction (FOLK), this paper shows how different action-ascriptions to turns using the same format depend on various orders of context. We show that not only sequential position, but also epistemic status, interactional histories, multimodal conduct, and linguistic devices co-occurring in the same turn are decisive for the action implemented by the format. The range of actions performed with Kannst du X? and their close interpretive interrelationship suggest that they should not be viewed as a fixed inventory of context-dependent interpretations of the format. Rather, the format provides for a root-interpretation that can be adapted to local contextual contingencies, yielding situated action-ascriptions that depend on constraints created by contexts of use.
This conversation analytic study compares the use of negation particles in spoken German and Persian, namely nein/nee and na. While these particles have a range of functions in both languages (Ghaderi 2022; Imo 2017), their use in response to news remains understudied. We focus on nein/nee and na in two sequential contexts: (i) after prior disconfirmations (Extract (a)) and (ii) in response to either solicited or unsolicited informings (see Extracts (b) and (c), respectively). In both contexts, nein/nee and na mark unexpectedness and open up an opportunity space for more, but they do so in different ways and with different outcomes. Nein/nee- and na-turns after disconfirming, often minimal responses to first-position confirmable turns mark the prior as unexpected (or even contrasting with the nein/nee/na-speaker’s expectations) and thus as expandable/accountable (cf. Ford 2001; Gubina/Betz 2021). Nein/nee/na-turns after informings (e.g., announcements that display a story teller’s negative emotional stance) differ not only in sequential position but also in prosodic realization. They can be either falling or rising, but all are characterized by marked prosody, i.e., lengthening, very low onset, smiling or breathy voice, or high overall pitch. Through position and turn design features, such nein/nee- and na-turns not only mark a prior turn as counter to (normative) expectations, but may also display the speaker’s affective stance and affiliate with the affective stance of the prior interactant. By comparing the use of nein/nee and na in German and Persian in the two functions illustrated in Extracts (a) and (b/c), we will show (i) how nein/nee- and na-turns shape interactional trajectories after responsive actions and (ii) what role the particles play in managing news and stance-taking as well as epistemic and affective positioning. Apart from revealing similarities in the use of German and Persian negation particles, the results of our crosslinguistic comparison will demonstrate that even if different languages have similar practices for specific actions, the use of these practices is language- and culture-specific. This means that even similar practices in different languages have their own “collateral effects” (Sidnell/Enfield 2012), linguistic and prosodic characteristic features, and, at least sometimes, consequences for social actions accomplished in the specific language (e.g., Dingemanse/Blythe/Dirksmeyer 2014; Evans/Levinson 2009; Floyd/Rossi/Enfield (eds.) 2020; Fox et al. 2009). Our study uses the method of Conversation Analysis (Sidnell/Stivers (eds.) 2013) and draws on more than 80 hours of audio and video recordings of spontaneous interactions (co-present, via video link, and on the telephone) in everyday and institutional contexts.
Die Arbeit wurde vom Verein für Gesprächsforschung mit dem Dissertationsförderpreis 2020 ausgezeichnet.
Bis heute gehört die Frage, wie InteraktionsteilnehmerInnen verstehen, welche von mehreren möglichen Lesarten eines sprachlichen Formats im jeweiligen Kontext gilt, zu den größten Herausforderungen der Konversationsanalyse. Aufbauend auf den Erkenntnissen über soziales Handeln in der Interaktion in Sprechakttheorie und Konversationsanalyse beschäftigt sich diese Arbeit mit dem Verhältnis zwischen rekurrenten sprachlichen Formaten und sozialen Handlungen. Im Fokus stehen interrogative und deklarative Modalverbformate: soll ich...?, kannst du...?, willst/magst/möchtest du...?, du kannst... und ich kann...
Eine umfassende, korpusdatengestützte Untersuchung zu diesen Formaten im Deutschen fehlte bisher. In der Forschung zu anderen Sprachen wurden vergleichbare Formate eingehender untersucht, aber fast ausschließlich in Bezug auf direktiv-kommissive Handlungen, wie Bitten, Aufforderungen, Angebote, Vorschläge etc., während das breitere Handlungsspektrum und -potenzial der Formate nicht aufgezeigt wurde.
Die vorliegende Untersuchung zeigt auf,
1. welches Handlungsspektrum die untersuchten Formate aufweisen,
2. wie die Komposition eines Turns, dessen Position (i.e., in der laufenden Sequenz, in der Interaktion, in der Aktivität oder in der Interaktionsgeschichte) sowie weitere kontextuelle Faktoren (wie z.B. die Verteilung von epistemischen und deontischen Rechten) dazu beitragen, wie das Format als diese oder jene Handlung in der Interaktion verstanden wird, und
3. welches Handlungspotenzial bzw. welche globale Handlungsbedeutung das jeweilige Format aufweist.
Die Untersuchung bedient sich der Methodik der Konversationsanalyse und der Interaktionalen Linguistik und beruht auf mehr als 500 Belegen aus Videoaufnahmen natürlicher Interaktion aus dem FOLK-Korpus.
Die vorliegende Arbeit zeigt, welche Handlungen mit den untersuchten Formaten vollzogen werden und welche Rolle unterschiedliche Faktoren (wie die Position des Turns, die Verteilung von deontischen und epistemischen Rechten, und die Verantwortung für das Projekt, auf das sich die Handlung bezieht, das Agens der künftigen Handlung, das nonverbale Verhalten von Interagierenden während der Realisierung des fokalen Turns etc.) dafür spielen, wie das jeweilige Format verstanden wird. Überdies wird nachgewiesen, welche weiteren linguistischen Merkmale (wie z.B. Vorkommen von Adverbien und Modal- bzw. Abtönungspartikeln, Argumentrealisierung, Wortfolge, Semantik des Vollverbs etc.) zusätzlich zum Modalverbformat für Handlungskonstitution und -zuschreibung relevant sein können und wann. Somit werden Faktoren herausgearbeitet, die für die weitere Entwicklung des Konzeptes ‚Format für soziale Handlungen‘ notwendig sind.
Die Arbeit zeigt, dass eine umfassende Analyse des gesamten Handlungsspektrums der Verwendung sprachlicher Formen auf Basis eines großen Korpus notwendig ist, um die für bestimmte Handlungsfunktionen relevanten Realisierungs- und Kontextbedingungen korrekt identifizieren zu können und vorschnellen Schlüssen über die Assoziation von linguistischen Formaten mit bestimmten Handlungen vorzubeugen. Trotz unterschiedlicher feingranularer Funktionen der Formate ist allerdings stets eine Kernbedeutung feststellbar, die zum Handlungspotenzial des jeweiligen Formats beiträgt.