Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Keywords
- Computerunterstützte Lexikografie (1)
- Computerunterstützte Lexikographie (1)
- Deutsch (1)
- Fremdsprache (1)
- Innovationspotenzial (1)
- Lernhilfe (1)
- Online-Wörterbuch (1)
- Partizipation (1)
- Student (1)
- World Wide Web 2.0 (1)
Publicationstate
- Zweitveröffentlichung (2)
- Postprint (1)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (2)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (1)
Publisher
- Oxford Univ. Press (1)
- Oxford University Press (1)
- de Gruyter (1)
In diesem Beitrag diskutieren wir einen neuen Ansatz zur Erarbeitung von Wörterbüchern, bei dem eine große Zahl Freiwilliger gemeinsam ein Online-Wörterbuch entwickelt. Wir charakterisieren zunächst die wesentlichen Eckpunkte dieses nutzergetrieben-kollaborativen Vorgehens und diskutieren den aktuellen Stand der Forschung. Wir untersuchen Struktur, Dynamik und Zusammensetzung von kollaborativ erarbeiteten Wortschätzen und diskutieren, welches Innovationspotenzial in kollaborativen Wörterbüchern steckt und ob professionell erstellte Wörterbücher durch den neuen Ansatz obsolet werden.
We present an empirical study addressing the question whether, and to which extent, lexicographic writing aids improve text revision results. German university students were asked to optimise two German texts using (1) no aids at all, (2) highlighted problems, or (3) highlighted problems accompanied by lexicographic resources that could be used to solve the specific problems. We found that participants from the third group corrected the largest number of problems and introduced the fewest semantic distortions during revision. Also, they reached the highest overall score and were most efficient (as measured in points per time). The second group with highlighted problems lies between the two other groups in almost every measure we analysed. We discuss these findings in the scope of intelligent writing environments, the effectiveness of writing aids in practical usage situations and teaching dictionary skills.
We present an empirical study addressing the question whether, and to which extent, lexicographic writing aids improve text revision results. German university students were asked to optimise two German texts using (1) no aids at all, (2) highlighted problems, or (3) highlighted problems accompanied by lexicographic resources that could be used to solve the specific problems. We found that participants from the third group corrected the largest number of problems and introduced the fewest semantic distortions during revision. Also, they reached the highest overall score and were most efficient (as measured in points per time). The second group with highlighted problems lies between the two other groups in almost every measure we analysed. We discuss these findings in the scope of intelligent writing environments, the effectiveness of writing aids in practical usage situations and teaching dictionary skills.