Open Access

Making research data publicly available for evaluation or reuse is a fundamental part of good scientific practice. However, regulations such as copyright law can prevent this practice and thereby hamper scientific progress. In Germany, text-based research disciplines have for a long time been mostly unable to publish corpora made from material outside of the public domain, effectively excluding contemporary works. While there are approaches to obfuscate text material in a way that it is no longer covered by the original copyright, many use cases still require the raw textual context for evaluation or follow-up research. Recent changes in copyright now permit text and data mining on copyrighted works. However, questions regarding reusability and sharing of such corpora at a later time are still not answered to a satisfying degree. We propose a workflow that allows interested third parties to access customized excerpts of protected corpora in accordance with current German copyright law and the soon to be implemented guidelines of the Digital Single Market directive. Our prototype is a very lightweight web interface that builds on commonly used repository software and web standards.

Since the introduction of large language models in Natural Language Processing, large raw corpora have played a crucial role in Computational Linguistics. However, most of these large raw corpora are either available only for English or not available to the general public due to copyright issues. Nevertheless, there are some examples of freely available multilingual corpora for training Deep Learning NLP models, such as the OSCAR and Paracrawl corpora. However, they have quality issues, especially for low-resource languages. Moreover, recreating or updating these corpora is very complex. In this work, we try to reproduce and improve the goclassy pipeline used to create the OSCAR corpus. We propose a new pipeline that is faster, modular, parameterizable, and well documented. We use it to create a corpus similar to OSCAR but larger and based on recent data. Also, unlike OSCAR, the metadata information is at the document level. We release our pipeline under an open source license and publish the corpus under a research-only license.

The human ability to anticipate upcoming behavior not only enables smooth turn transitions but also makes early responses possible, as respondents use a variety of cues that provide for early projection of the type of action that is being performed. This article examines resources for projection in interaction in three unrelated languages—Finnish, Japanese, and Mandarin—in sequences where speakers make evaluative assertions on a topic. The focus is on independently agreeing responses initiated in early overlap. Our cross-linguistic analysis reveals that while projection based on the ongoing turn-constructional unit relies on language-specific grammatical constructions, projection based on the larger context seems to be less language-dependent. A crucial finding is that in the target sequences, stances taken toward the topic already during earlier talk, as well as other structural patterns, are among the resources that recipients use for projecting how and when the ongoing turn will end.

This article explores the relation between word order and response latency, focusing on responses to question-word questions. Qualitative (multimodal) and quantitative analyses of naturally occurring conversations in French—where question-words can occur in initial, medial, or final position within the question—show that variation in word order affects the timing of responses. It is argued that this is so because word order provides a differential basis for action ascription, creating different temporal opportunities for projecting the recipient’s next relevant action. The frequent occurrence of early responses to questions with an initial question-word, in particular, stresses the importance of the recognition point of an action under way for response timing and shows respondents’ pervasive orientation to sequential progressivity. Findings highlight how lexico-syntactic trajectories of emergent turns, prior talk and actions, material and bodily features of interaction, and participants’ shared expectations conspire in shaping the time-courses of action ascription and action projection.

Focusing on request sequences, this article explores dynamics of projection and anticipation, enabling participants to produce early responses to requests. In particular, the analyses highlight the importance of multimodal formatting and the specific temporalities of multiple multimodal resources for the emergence of projections and the possibility to anticipate an ongoing action. Moreover, the analyses pinpoint the relevance of the local ecology and the praxeological context for the participants, enabling them to anticipate the next relevant action. These features characterizing the temporality of multimodal Gestalts, the relevance of the local ecology, and the details of the praxeological context make it possible for participants to produce very early responses and also to accomplish an action even before it has been actually requested.

Die traditionelle Sprachtypologie befasst sich hauptsächlich mit Standardvarietäten. Umgangssprache und Dialekte bleiben meistens außerhalb ihres Forschungsfeldes. Als extrem produktiv erweist sich ein integrierter typologisch-dialektologischer Ansatz, dessen Forschungsgegenstand die morphosyntaktischen Eigenschaften der Nicht-Standard-Varietäten sind. Die Anwendung typologischer Parameter und Hierarchien auf diese Varietäten ermöglicht eine vollständige Darstellung der wirklichen sprachlichen Lage eines Sprachgebiets, sowie eine Revision herkömmlicher typologischer Klassifikationen. Im Fall der Nicht-Standard-Relativsätze ergibt es sich, dass die Standardstrategie des Relativpronomens (der/die/das) in den deutschen Mundarten und in vielen romanischen und slavischen Nicht-Standard- Varietäten zu Gunsten anderer Strategien aufgegeben wird, die das Relativpronomen durch eine Relativpartikel bzw. die Kombination einer Relativpartikel mit einem Resumptivum ersetzen. Diese Strategien entsprechen den in den meisten Sprachen der Welt benutzten Verfahren zur Bildung von Relativsätzen: Ihr Gebrauch hängt vermutlich mit den Eigenschaften dieser Varietäten (z.B. Spontaneität, niedrige Ausbaustufe) zusammen.

Der, die, das wird traditionell als Demonstrativpronomen eingestuft, obwohl es besonders in der gesprochenen Sprache zum Ausdruck der Referenz auf dritte Personen mit dem Personalpronomen er, sie, es in komplementärer Distribution auftritt. Im Beitrag wird das Verhältnis zwischen der und er zunächst auf dem Hintergrund anderer europäischer Sprachen kontrastiv untersucht. Anschließend wird die Frage der Didaktisierung aufgeworfen: an einem konkreten Beispiel wird gezeigt, wie man Deutschlernende auf den Gebrauch von der als Personalpronomen aufmerksam machen kann.

This special issue investigates early responses—responsive actions that (start to) unfold while the production of the responded-to turn and action is still under way. Although timing in human conduct has gained intense interest in research, the early production of responsive actions has so far largely remained unexplored. But what makes early responses possible? What do such responses tell us about the complex interplay between syntax, prosody, and embodied conduct? And what sorts of actions do participants accomplish by means of such early responses? By addressing these questions, the special issue seeks to offer new advances in the systematic analysis of temporal organization in interaction, contributing to broader discussions in the language and cognitive sciences as to the social coordination of human conduct.

This paper represents a report on an e-tandem project conducted at Freiburg University (Germany) from the winter term 2009/2010 on. It started with a German-ltalian pilot course organised in cooperation with Pavia University (Italy). In order to promote autonomous language learning, the authors used several web-based applications, relying on Skype to enable full (i.e. visual, auditive) interaction between learning partners and on e-mails to let participants practise writing and reading in the respective foreign language. Additionally, participants were asked to compile a weekly electronic portfolio (EPOS) to record their improvements as well as their difficulties. In the paper, the structure of the pilot course will be described and a first balance will be drawn.

This study documents change over time and across proficiency levels in French second-language (L2) speakers’ practices for initiating complaints. Prior research has shown that speakers typically initiate complaints in a stepwise manner that indexes the contingent, moral, and delicate nature of the activity. Although elementary speakers in my data often launch complaint sequences in a straightforward way, they sometimes embodiedly foreshadow verbal expressions of negative stance or delay negative talk through brief positively valenced prefaces. More advanced speakers in part rely on the same initiation practices as elementary speakers. In addition, they recurrently use extensive prefatory work that accounts for and legitimizes the upcoming complaint, and they regularly initiate complaints jointly with coparticipants through a progressive escalation of negative stance expressions. I document interactional resources involved in this change and discuss the findings in terms of speakers’ development of L2 interactional competence. Data are in French with English translations.

Based on longitudinal audiovisual data from family interactions, we focus on how young children between 1;08 and 2;10 report trouble they are encountering in their current activity using the response cry oh in combination with other lexical items (e.g., “oh fell off”) and bodily displays. While at a very young age the children remain focused on their activity and try to solve the problem independently, at an older age they start to systematically use gaze directed toward the parent and suspension of the current activity to enlist the adult’s assistance. We argue that these bodily displays are among the resources whose presence or absence constrains whether the report of trouble leads to the recruitment of assistance or not. Regarding the developmental implications, it seems that during their third year of life, young children expand their repertoire for dealing with trouble interactively. Data are in German with English translations.

Une e-Université est une université qui utilise les nouvelles technologies de l'information et de la communication (NTIC) pour remplir ses missions traditionnelles : la production, la préservation et la transmission du savoir. Ses activités consistent donc à collecter et analyser les données de recherche, à diffuser les écrits scientifiques et à fournir des ressources pédagogiques numériques. Or ces biens immatériels font souvent l'objet de droits de propriété littéraire et artistique, notamment le droit d'auteur et le droit sui generis des producteurs de bases de données. Ceci oblige les e-Universités soit à obtenir des autorisations nécessaires des titulaires des monopoles, soit à avoir recours aux exceptions légales. La recherche et l'enseignement font l'objet d'exceptions légales (cf. art. L. 122-5, 3°, e) du Code de la propriété intellectuelle (CPI) et dans les art. 52a et 53 de la Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG)). Toutefois, celles-ci s'avèrent manifestement insuffisantes pour accommoder les activités des e-Universités. Ainsi, les législateurs nationaux ont très récemment introduit de nouvelles exceptions visant plus spécifiquement l'utilisation des NTIC dans la recherche et l'enseignement (art. L. 122-5, 10° et art. L. 342-3, 5° du CPI et les futurs art. 60a-60h de la UrhG). Une réforme en ce sens a également été proposée par la Commission Européenne (art. 3 et 4 de la proposition de la Directive sur le droit d'auteur dans le marche unique numérique). Dans ce contexte, il est souhaitable de mener le débat sur l'introduction d'une norme ouverte (de type fair use) en droit européen. Malgré cette incertitude juridique qui entoure la matière, les e-Universités n'ont pas cessé de remplir leurs missions. En effet, la communauté académique a depuis un certain temps entrepris des efforts d'autorégulation (private ordering). Le concept d'Open Science, inspiré des valeurs traditionnelles de l'éthique scientifique, a donc émergé pour promouvoir le libre partage des données de recherche (Open Research Data), des écrits scientifiques (Open Access) et des ressources pédagogiques (Open Educational Resources). Le savoir est donc perçu comme un commun (commons), dont la préservation et le développement durable sont garantis par des standards acceptés par la communauté académique. Ces standards se traduisent en langage juridique grâce aux licences publiques, telles que les Creative Commons. Ces dernières années les universités, mais aussi les organismes finançant la recherche et même les législateurs nationaux se sont activement engagés dans la promotion des communs du savoir. Ceci s'exprime à travers des "mandats" Open Access et l'instauration d'un nouveau droit de publication secondaire, d'abord en droit allemand (art. 38(4) de la UrhG) et récemment aussi en droit français (art. L. 533-4, I du Code de la recherche).

Leicht hat es die Duden-Redaktion derzeit nicht. Im Sommer erst musste sie sich ungerechtfertigterweise vorhalten lassen, mit der Aufnahme neuer Wörter in die 28. Auflage des Rechtschreibdudens eine links-grüne Agenda zu verfolgen. Vor kurzem hieß es nun, im Online-Duden werde heimlich eine Sprachveränderung betrieben, die zum Verschwinden des generischen Maskulinums führe. Kürzlich hat deshalb der “Verein Deutsche Sprache”, jener umstrittene Verein konservativer Sprachschützer*innen, sogar einen öffentlichen Aufruf gegen den Dudenverlag gestartet. Was ist also dran an diesem Vorwurf?

The new official orthographic guidelines were brought into force by the official state authorities on August 1st, 1998 and its principle goals were a standardized representation of the guidelines and a «gentle simplification in respect of content». This regulation was not supported by the public and in fact it was the starting point for a struggle for conceptual solutions and a quest for the achievement of' a consensus between different possible norms. Since orthography is an officially codified standard taking up a prominent position among linguistic standards, it is of particular socio-political importance. It was the foremost task of the Council for German Orthography (Rat für deutsche Rechtschreibung), instituted in December 2004, to elaborate a compromise in order to bring the «Orthographical war» (Die Zeit) to an end, which was led enthusiastically for more than a decade. - The concern of this article is to classify historically the agreement reached in 2006. Against this background, it can be stated that official guidelines will only be accepted, if they are based upon the usage in writing and if they take into account the interests of the reader. Both principles are characterizing the proposal made by the Council for German Orthography. An outlook on the Council's activities concerning orthographic standardization expected in the future will conclude this article.

“To cleanse and at the same time enrich your mother tongue is the task of the brightest people.” With this quote Goethe, the famous German poet, seemed to have described the work of EFNIL today. But is our task really that easy? Do we “cleanse” our language by deleting superfluous elements? Do we not lose the rich abundance of a language in so doing? Or is Goethe asking for other languages to be prevented from influencing his mother tongue? Would this even be feasible in a globalised world? Rudi Carrell, a famous entertainer on German TV, once said: “When I came to Germany I only spoke English. But the German language contains so many English words nowadays that I am now fluent in German!” His opinion is probably shared by many people learning German. My daily job is to support around 100,000 schools abroad that offer German as a foreign language. We ask ourselves daily: which German language should we be offering young people today? The classical German of literature? Or practical German which will enable young people to join the workforce of many German companies worldwide? And most of all: how do we motivate young people to learn German? Or any other foreign language? Yes, English, French, German, Spanish – these languages are in competition in many schools. But the most important fact is: the benefit lies in learning a foreign language, no matter which. Because by learning a foreign language we start to understand foreign cultures and other people. And THAT is what matters.

Research on multimodal interaction has shown that simultaneity of embodied behavior and talk is constitutive for social action. In this study, we demonstrate different temporal relationships between verbal and embodied actions. We focus on uses of German darf/kann ich? (“may/can I?”) in which speakers initiate, or even complete the embodied action that is addressed by the turn before the recipient’s response. We argue that through such embodied conduct, the speaker bodily enacts high agency, which is at odds with the low deontic stance they express through their darf/kann ich?-TCUs. In doing so, speakers presuppose that the intersubjective permissibility of the action is highly probable or even certain. Moreover, we demonstrate how the speaker’s embodied action, joint perceptual salience of referents, and the projectability of the action addressed with darf/kann ich? allow for a lean syntactic design of darf/kann ich?-TCUs (i.e., pronominalization, object omission, and main verb omission). Our findings underscore the reflexive relationship between lean syntax, sequential organization and multimodal conduct.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on personal data protection in the European Union entered into application on 25 May 2018. With its 173 recitals and 99 articles, it may be one of the most ambitious pieces of EU legislation to date. Rather than a guide to GDPR compliance for Digital Humanities researchers, this chapter looks at the use of personal data in DH projects from the data subject’s perspective, and examines to what extent the GDPR kept its promise of enabling the data subject to “take control of his data”. The chapter provides an overview of the right to privacy and the right to data protection, a discussion of the relation between the concept of data control and privacy and data protection law, an introduction to the GDPR, and an explanation of its relevance for scientific research in general and DH in particular. The main section of the chapter analyses two types of data control mechanisms (consent and data subject rights) and their impact on DH research.

Abusive language detection is an emerging field in natural language processing which has received a large amount of attention recently. Still the success of automatic detection is limited. Particularly, the detection of implicitly abusive language, i.e. abusive language that is not conveyed by abusive words (e.g. dumbass or scum), is not working well. In this position paper, we explain why existing datasets make learning implicit abuse difficult and what needs to be changed in the design of such datasets. Arguing for a divide-and-conquer strategy, we present a list of subtypes of implicitly abusive language and formulate research tasks and questions for future research.

Mit Entwicklungen in der Welt entsteht auch ein neuer Wortschatz, insbesondere in Zeiten großer gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche oder bedingt durch Krisen, denn neue Dinge, neue Umstände, »neue Normalitäten« müssen bezeichnet werden, damit darüber kommuniziert werden kann. Zugleich steigt die Gebrauchshäufigkeit älterer Wörter, weil sie aktuell für die Verständigung besonders relevant werden. Die in diesem Glossar präsentierten Begriffe thematisieren solche sprachlichen Auswirkungen der Coronakrise.

Zeitnah zur großen Fluchtmigration von 2015 hat das Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1DS) gleich zu Beginn des Jahres 2016 das Projekt „Deutsch im Beruf: Die sprachlich-kommunikative Integration von Flüchdingen“ gestartet, um den Migrations-und Integrationsprozess der Geflüchteten von Anfang an dokumentieren und analysieren zu können. In Bezug auf die gegenwärtige Situation der Fluchtmigranten und -migrantinnen sind dabei insbesondere zwei Etappen von großer Bedeutung, die wir in unserem Projekt genauer fokussieren. Für die Integration und Partizipation der Migranten und Migrantinnen spielen zunächst ausreichende Deutschkenntnisse eine große Rolle, die in den mehrmonatigen Integrationskursen vermittelt werden. Hierzu hat das IDS in Kooperation mit dem Goethe-Institut eine zweistufige Sprachstandserhebung (in der Folge IDS-Goethe-Studie) in den allgemeinen Integrationskursen durchgeführt, die die Sprachbiographien, Sozialdaten und die Sprachlernfortschritte der Geflüchteten analysiert, und deren Ergebnisse im vorliegenden Aufsatz präsentiert werden. Daneben werden im IDS-Projekt u.a. die vielfältigen beruflichen Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen der Bundesagentur für Arbeit gesprächs- und interaktionsanalytisch untersucht, die für die Geflüchteten oftmals als Einstieg ins Arbeitsleben und somit als eine wichtige Integrationsetappe fungieren (vgl. Cindark; Hünlich 2017, Cindark; Deppermann 2018, Cindark 2018, 2019).

Social actions are recipient-designed actions that occur in the context of interaction sequences. This chapter focuses on sources and practices for the formation and ascription of social actions. While linguists stress the relevance of linguistic social action formats, conversation analysts highlight the relevance of the sequential position of an action, and sociolinguists point to the influence of social identities for action-formation and -ascription. The combination of these three approaches helps us to solve the analytic problem of indirectness, which, however, only rarely becomes a problem for the participants in an interaction themselves. Social properties which recurrently apply when using verbal and bodily resources of action-formation, i.e. the social actions themselves, inferred meanings, projected next actions, the participation framework, the activity type, speaker’s stance, participants’ identities, etc. lead to stable pragmatic connotations of those forms, i.e. action-meanings, which become idiomatic and part of our common-sense competence. Still, social actions are multi-layered and can be ambiguous at times. Therefore, their meaning can be open for negotiation. Intersubjectivity of action ascription is ultimately secured neither by conventions nor by speaker’s intentions, but is accomplished by their treatment in subsequent discourse.

How do people’s interactional practices change over time? Can conversation analysis identify those changes, and if so, how? In this introductory article, we scrutinize the novel insights that can be gained from examining interactional practices over time and discuss the related methodological challenges for longitudinal CA. We first retrace CA’s interest in the temporality of social interaction and then review three lines of current CA work on change over time: developmental studies, studies of sociohistorical change, and studies of joint interactional histories. Existing work shows how the execution of locally coordinated actions and their meanings change over time; how prior actions inform future actions; and how resources, practices, and structures of joint action emerge over people’s repeated interactional encounters. We conclude by arguing that the empirical analysis of the microlevel organization of social interaction, which is the hallmark of CA, can elucidate the fine-grained situated interactional infrastructure that provides for the larger-scale social dynamics that have been of interest to other lines of research.

Am Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS) wurde im Programmbereich „Lexikografie und Sprachdokumentation“ ein neuartiges Wörterbuch entwickelt, das leicht verwechselbare Ausdrücke in ihrem aktuellen öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch deskriptiv beschreibt. Im Jahr 2018 erschien das elektronische Nachschlagewerk „Paronyme – Dynamisch im Kontrast“, das sich durch folgende drei Aspekte auszeichnet: 1) Erstens liegen mehrstufige kontrastive Beschreibungsebenen und flexible Darstellungsformen vor; 2) zweitens sind die Bedeutungserläuterungen kognitiv-konzeptuell angelegt, um einer langen Forderung nach einer stärker kognitiv ausgerichteten Lexikografie Rechnung zu tragen; 3) drittens werden Datengrundlagen und Analysemethoden genutzt, mit denen umfassend Paronyme ermittelt und diese anschließend erstmals empirisch ausgewertet werden konnten.

This study deals with interpretation practices that speakers employ in order to (re)formulate what another person has said or implied. Analyzing interpretations in a public televised mediation that resembles a public debate, I show which kinds of interpretation practices that speakers adopt and how they differ depending the participants' roles. Systematically comparing all interpretations of the mediator vs. the opposing participants’, I argue that interpretations can be described as general practices with specific interactional effects, but that they are designed and exploited in different ways (i.e., for clarification and discourse-organization vs. self- and other-positioning and constructing arguments). I point out that speakers use meta-pragmatic accounts that support the interactional effects of their interpretations.