Refine
Year of publication
- 2009 (229) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (97)
- Article (71)
- Conference Proceeding (23)
- Book (17)
- Part of Periodical (6)
- Review (5)
- Contribution to a Periodical (4)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Other (2)
- Report (1)
Language
- German (171)
- English (49)
- French (2)
- Italian (2)
- Portuguese (2)
- Latvian (1)
- Multiple languages (1)
- Russian (1)
Keywords
- Deutsch (110)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (19)
- Sprachnorm (15)
- Konversationsanalyse (11)
- Sprachgebrauch (11)
- Grammatik (10)
- Verb (10)
- Wörterbuch (10)
- Computerlinguistik (9)
- Interaktion (9)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (88)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (24)
- Postprint (12)
Reviewstate
Publisher
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (42)
- de Gruyter (29)
- Lang (14)
- Narr (13)
- Niemeyer (6)
- Elsevier (3)
- Springer (3)
- Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis (2)
- Benjamins (2)
- Cornelsen Scriptor (2)
Die Flexionsmorphologie des Deutschen ist ein zentraler Forschungsgegenstand des europäischen Forschungsnetzwerks EuroGr@mm, dessen Erschließung für Forschung und Lehre seit Anfang 2007 vorangetrieben wird. Das europäische Projekt hatte sich zur Aufgabe gemacht, diesen grammatischen Themenbereich aus französischer, italienischer, norwegischer, polnischer und ungarischer Perspektive kontrastiv zu beleuchten. Die ersten Ergebnisse wurden nun in Form von didaktisch aufbereiteten Wissenseinheiten auf der Lemplattform ProGr@mm kontrastiv veröffentlicht.
Contrasting and turn transition: Prosodic projection with the parallel-opposition constructions
(2009)
The parallel-opposition construction has not yet been widely described as an independent construction type. This article reports on its realization in everyday British-English conversation. In particular, it focusses on prosodic projection in the lexically and syntactically unmarked first component of this syntactic pattern, and thus adds to the body of research investigating the organization of turn-taking in the context of bi-clausal constructions with which the first part lacks explicit lexical hints to their continuation. It is shown that the parallel-opposition construction, next to specific semantic–pragmatic, syntactic and lexical features, also exhibits a relatively fixed range of prosodic features in the first conjunct, among these narrow focus, continuing intonation and/or the avoidance of intonation-unit boundary signals. These are used to project continuation of an otherwise complete utterance and, thus, to secure the floor for the expression of contrast. In addition, the detailed analysis of apparently deviant cases, which takes into account the on-line production of syntax, shows that a lack of prosodically projective features in the first component of the parallel-opposition construction can be explained by the strategic, retrospective use of the construction to resolve problems in turn transition.
Dieser Band ergänzt die bisherigen kontrastiv-typologischen Forschungen um eine neue Komponente. Hauptgegenstand ist der Vergleich zweier Satzmodussysteme, nämlich des deutschen und des ungarischen. Die Einbeziehung weiterer Kontrastsprachen erweitert das Vergleichsspektrum um weitere, typologisch relevante Möglichkeiten. Die so erarbeiteten deutsch-ungarischen Vergleiche wurden durch zahlreiche empirische Untersuchungen mit Textkorpora sowie mit Tondokumenten belegt: Die lexikogrammatischen Merkmale wurden in einem deutsch-ungarischen Vergleichskorpus getestet, die Tonmuster mit einem phonetischen Analyseprogramm ausgewertet. Die Motivierung der Entwicklung eines bestimmten Satzmodusmerkmals durch den Wandel eines anderen Merkmals gibt aufschlussreiche Informationen zur Wechselwirkung der Ebenen des Sprachsystems. Eine Zusammenfassung der historischen Entwicklung des Satzmodussystems des Deutschen und des Ungarischen macht typologisch relevante Entwicklungstendenzen sichtbar.
The paper discusses from various angles the morphosyntactic annotation of DeReKo, the Archive of General Reference Corpora of Contemporary Written German at the Institut für Deutsche Sprache (IDS), Mannheim. The paper is divided into two parts. The first part covers the practical and technical aspects of this endeavor. We present results from a recent evaluation of tools for the annotation of German text resources that have been applied to DeReKo. These tools include commercial products, especially Xerox' Finite State Tools and the Machinese products developed by the Finnish company Connexor Oy, as well as software for which academic licenses are available free of charge for academic institutions, e.g. Helmut Schmid's Tree Tagger. The second part focuses on the linguistic interpretability of the corpus annotations and more general methodological considerations concerning scientifically sound empirical linguistic research. The main challenge here is that unlike the texts themselves, the morphosyntactic annotations of DeReKo do not have the status of observed data; instead they constitute a theory and implementation-dependent interpretation. In addition, because of the enormous size of DeReKo, a systematic manual verification of the automatic annotations is not feasible. In consequence, the expected degree of inaccuracy is very high, particularly wherever linguistically challenging phenomena, such as lexical or grammatical variation, are concerned. Given these facts, a researcher using the annotations blindly will run the risk of not actually studying the language but rather the annotation tool or the theory behind it. The paper gives an overview of possible pitfalls and ways to circumvent them and discusses the opportunities offered by using annotations in corpus-based and corpus-driven grammatical research against the background of a scientifically sound methodology.