Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Book (27) (remove)
Language
- English (18)
- German (7)
- Multiple languages (2)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (11)
- Deutsch (6)
- Computerlinguistik (5)
- Datenmanagement (5)
- Forschungsdaten (3)
- Soziolinguistik (3)
- Digital Humanities (2)
- EURALEX (20 : 2022 : Mannheim) (2)
- Englisch (2)
- Grammatik (2)
Publicationstate
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (27) (remove)
Publisher
- De Gruyter (3)
- IDS-Verlag (3)
- European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2)
- European language resources association (ELRA) (2)
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2)
- Universitätsverlag Hildesheim (2)
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (1)
- European Language Resources Association (1)
- Frontiers Media SA (1)
- Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie und Computerlinguistik (1)
Variation ist ein wesentliches Merkmal von Sprachen und auf allen Ebenen der linguistischen Beschreibung zu finden. In der Forschungsliteratur wird allgemein angenommen, dass Variation – sofern es nicht zur funktionalen oder semantischen Ausdifferenzierung kommt – langfristig zu Verdrängungsprozessen und damit zu Sprachwandel führt. Als empirische Evidenz wird zumeist die Seltenheit lexikalischer Synonyme genannt. Der vorliegende Band bietet eine kritische Betrachtung dieser Annahme am Beispiel morphologisch-syntaktischer Konkurrenzen im Deutschen und Niederländischen. Konkreter Untersuchungsgegenstand sind Adjektiv-Nomen-Komposita (z.B. Kaltmiete), die gleichermaßen als Benennungen dienenden Phrasen (z.B. kaltes Büfett) sowie die zugrunde liegenden strukturellen Bildungsmuster Komposition und Phrasenbildung. Anhand historischer Fallstudien wird die Entwicklung beider Muster seit 1700 beschrieben und untersucht, ob von einem Verdrängungsprozess ausgegangen werden kann, der zur Unproduktivität eines der beiden Muster führt. Der Sprachvergleich erlaubt dabei die Identifikation einzelsprachlicher Präferenzen sowie verschiedener Faktoren, die zu Divergenz- und Konvergenzprozessen zwischen dem Deutschen und Niederländischen führen.
Der Sammelband zur typologisch und kontrastiv vergleichenden grammatischen Erforschung und Beschreibung des Satzanfangs des Deutschen und vier seiner Kontrastsprachen ist ein Ergebnis eines Forschungsnetzwerks, bestehend aus dem Institut für Deutsche Sprache (Mannheim) und Forschergruppen verschiedener europäischer Universitäten. Unter Berücksichtigung insbesondere morphosyntaktischer und informationsstruktureller Aspekte werden die satztopologischen Unterschiede der typologisch recht heterogenen Sprachen bzw. Sprachfamilien unter verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten beleuchtet. Die Untersuchungen werden korpusbasiert durchgeführt, wobei sich die Hälfte der Beiträge auf aufbereitete POS-getaggte Wikipedia-Korpora stützt. Die quantitativ ausgerichteten Korpusanalysen ermöglichen einen genauen Einblick in die unterschiedlichen Strukturmerkmale der betreffenden Sprachen sowie in sprachübergreifende Textmerkmale, und die qualitativen Untersuchungen zeigen Ähnlichkeiten und Abweichungen bei bestimmten Verfahren, die sich morphosyntaktisch iederschlagen und besonders am Satzanfang relevant sind. Insgesamt erlauben die Beiträge Hypothesen zu topologisch und informationsstrukturell markierten Satzanfängen und zu Präferenzen in den jeweiligen Sprachen, aber auch zu möglichen Konstanten und Gemeinsamkeiten, was – auf differenziertere Korpora erweitert – für die Bereiche Sprache und Kognition sowie computergestützte Übersetzung ein großer Gewinn sein dürfte.
Prediction is a central mechanism in the human language processing architecture. The psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic literature has seen a lively debate about what form prediction may take and what status it has for language processing in the human mind and brain. While predictions are a ubiquitous finding, the implications of these results for models of language processing differ. For instance, eyetracking data suggest that predictions may rely on sublexical orthographic information in natural reading, while electrophysiological data provide mixed evidence for form-based predictions during reading. Other research has revealed that humans rapidly adapt to text specifics and that their predictive capacity varies, broadly speaking, in accordance with inter- and intra-individual language proficiency, which cuts across the speaker groups (e.g. L1 vs. L2 speakers, skilled vs. untrained readers) traditionally used for experimental contrasts. There is therefore evidence that the kind and strength of linguistic predictions depend on (at least) three sources of variability in language processing: speaker, text genre and experimental method.
The aim of this Research Topic is to develop a better understanding of prediction in light of the three sources of variability in language processing, by providing an overview of state-of-the art research on predictive language processing and by bringing together research from various disciplines.
First, intra-and inter-individual differences and their influence on predictive processes remain underrepresented in experimental research on predictive processing. How do language users differ in their predictive abilities and strategies, and how are these differences shaped by e.g. biological, social and cultural factors?
Second, while language users experience great stylistic diversity in their daily language exposure and use, the majority of language processing research still focuses on a very constrained register of well-controlled sentences composed in the standard language. How are predictions shaped by extra- and meta-linguistic context, such as register/genre or accent/speaker identity, and how may this influence the processing of experimental items in another language or text variety?
Third, the Research Topic invites contributions that make use of a multi-method approach, such as combined behavioral and electrophysiological measures or experimental methods combined with measures extracted from corpus data. What opportunities and challenges do we face when integrating multiple approaches to examine linguistic, experimental and individual differences in human predictive capacity?
We welcome contributions from all areas of empirical psycho- and neurolinguistics, but contributions must explicitly address variability and variation in language and language processing. Relevant topics include individual differences and the impact of genre, modality, register and language variety. Contributions that go beyond single word and single sentence paradigms are especially desirable. Experimental, corpus-based, meta-analytic and review papers, as well as theoretical/opinion pieces are welcome; however, papers of the latter type should support their arguments with substantial empirical evidence from the literature. Particularly desirable are contributions which combine topics and/or methods, such as the impact of an individual's native dialect on processing of constructions that show variability in the standard language (e.g. choice of auxiliary, agreement of mass nouns, etc.) or experimental methods combined with measures extracted from corpus data such as information-theoretic surprisal.
Contents:
1. Andreas Dittrich: Intra-connecting a small exemplary literary corpus with semantic web technologies for exploratory literary studies, S. 1
2. John Kirk, Anna Čermáková: From ICE to ICC: The new International Comparable Corpus, S. 7
3. Dawn Knight, Tess Fitzpatrick, Steve Morris, Jeremy Evas, Paul Rayson, Irena Spasic, Mark Stonelake, Enlli Môn Thomas, Steven Neale, Jennifer Needs, Scott Piao, Mair Rees, Gareth Watkins, Laurence Anthony, Thomas Michael Cobb, Margaret Deuchar, Kevin Donnelly, Michael McCarthy, Kevin Scannell: Creating CorCenCC (Corpws Cenedlaethol Cymraeg Cyfoes – The National Corpus of Contemporary Welsh), S. 13
4. Marc Kupietz, Andreas Witt, Piotr Bański, Dan Tufiş, Dan Cristea, Tamás Váradi: EuReCo - Joining Forces for a European Reference Corpus as a sustainable base for cross-linguistic research, S. 15
5. Harald Lüngen, Marc Kupietz: CMC Corpora in DeReKo, S. 20
6. David McClure, Mark Algee-Hewitt, Douris Steele, Erik Fredner, Hannah Walser: Organizing corpora at the Stanford Literary Lab, S. 25
7. Radoslav Rábara, Pavel Rychlý ,Ondřej Herman: Accelerating corpus search using multiple cores, S. 30
8. John Vidler, Stephen Wattam: Keeping Properties with the Data: CL-MetaHeaders – An Open Specification, S. 35
9. Vladimir Benko: Are Web Corpora Inferior? The Case of Czech and Slovak, S. 43
10. Edyta Jurkiewicz-Rohrbacher, Zrinka Kolaković, Björn Hansen: Web Corpora – the best possible solution for tracking phenomena in underresourced languages: clitics in Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian, S. 49
11. Vít Suchomel: Removing Spam from Web Corpora Through Supervised Learning Using FastText, S. 56
Contents:
1. Julien Abadji, Pedro Javier Ortiz Suárez, Laurent Romary and Benoît Sagot: "Ungoliant: An Optimized Pipeline for the Generation of a Very Large-Scale Multilingual Web Corpus", S.1-9.
2. Markus Gärtner, Felicitas Kleinkopf, Melanie Andresen and Sibylle Hermann: "Corpus Reusability and Copyright - Challenges and Opportunities", S.10-19.
3. Nils Diewald, Eliza Margaretha and Marc Kupietz: "Lessons learned in Quality Management for Online Research Software Tools in Linguistics", S.20-26.
Contents:
1. Johannes Graën, Tannon Kew, Anastassia Shaitarova and Martin Volk, "Modelling Large Parallel Corpora", S. 1-8
2. Pedro Javier Ortiz Suárez, Benoît Sagot and Laurent Romary, "Asynchronous Pipelines for Processing Huge Corpora on Medium to Low Resource Infrastructures", S. 9-16
3. Vladimír Benko, "Deduplication in Large Web Corpora", S. 17-22
4. Mark Davies, "The best of both worlds: Multi-billion word “dynamic” corpora", S. 23-28
5. Adrien Barbaresi, "On the need for domain-focused web corpora", S. 29-32
6. Marc Kupietz, Eliza Margaretha, Nils Diewald, Harald Lüngen and Peter Fankhauser, "What's New in EuReCo? Interoperability, Comparable Corpora, Licensing", S. 33-39
Contents:
1. Vasile Pais, Maria Mitrofan, Verginica Barbu Mititelu, Elena Irimia, Roxana Micu and Carol Luca Gasan: Challenges in Creating a Representative Corpus of Romanian Micro-Blogging Text. Pp. 1-7
2. Modest von Korff: Exhaustive Indexing of PubMed Records with Medical Subject Headings. Pp. 8-15
3. Luca Brigada Villa: UDeasy: a Tool for Querying Treebanks in CoNLL-U Format. Pp. 16-19
4. Nils Diewald: Matrix and Double-Array Representations for Efficient Finite State Tokenization. Pp. 20-26
5. Peter Fankhauser and Marc Kupietz: Count-Based and Predictive Language Models for Exploring DeReKo. Pp. 27-31
6. Hanno Biber: “The word expired when that world awoke.” New Challenges for Research with Large Text Corpora and Corpus-Based Discourse Studies in Totalitarian Times. Pp. 32-35