Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Doctoral Thesis (25)
- Book (6)
- Habilitation (2)
Keywords
- Deutsch (8)
- Korpus <Linguistik> (8)
- Englisch (4)
- Konversationsanalyse (4)
- Syntax (4)
- Wortschatz (4)
- Geschichte (3)
- Gespräch (3)
- Aspekt <Linguistik> (2)
- Computerlinguistik (2)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (33) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Qualifikationsarbeit (Dissertation, Habilitationsschrift) (33) (remove)
Publisher
- Lehrstuhl für deutsche Sprache des Omsker staatlichen pädagogischen Gorki-Instituts (2)
- Universität Mannheim (2)
- Universität Potsdam (2)
- Bielefeld University (1)
- Collibri-Verlag (1)
- Dublin City University (1)
- Frank & Timme (1)
- Freie Universität Berlin (1)
- IDS-Verlag (1)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache (1)
Deutsch in Kamerun
(1998)
This dissertation offers a qualitative analysis of verbal interactions in German television talk shows between 1989 and 1994. It investigates how Speakers of German formulate their own and others’ affiliation to national identities and social spaces. In particular, it examines classifications of place, person, and time that include group and place names as well as grammatically complex expressions, deictic pronouns and adverbs, and certain motion verbs. In addition, repair is discussed as a resource in re-formulating identities.
Im Zentrum der Dissertation steht der Begriff Informationsmodellierung oder genauer der Begriff der "textuellen Informationsmodellierung", wobei auf einer bereits vorgeschlagenen Unterscheidung einer primären und einer sekundären Ebene der Informationsstrukturierung aufgebaut wird. Der Gegenstand der primären Ebene sind die textuellen Daten selbst sowie ihre Strukturierung, wohingegen die sekundäre Ebene beschreibt, wie die für die primären Ebenen verwendeten Regelwerke mit alternativen Regelwerken in Beziehung gesetzt werden können. Der Einteilung in eine primäre und eine sekundäre Informationsstrukturierung wird in der Dissertation das Konzept der multiplen Informationsstrukturierung nebengeordnet. Dieses Konzept ist so zu verstehen, dass die primäre Ebene bei Bedarf vervielfacht wird - jedoch bezieht sich jede dieser Ebenen auf dieselbe Datengrundlage. Hierbei ergeben sich auch Auswirkungen auf die sekundäre Informationsstrukturierung. Die Informationsmodellierung erfolgt mit Auszeichnungssprachen. Die Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) stellt hierfür einen Rahmen dar, jedoch wurde dieser Formalismus seit seiner 1986 erfolgten Standardisierung nicht nur weiterentwickelt, sondern es wurde mit der Extensible Markup Language (XML) im Jahr 1998 eine wesentlich einfachere Untermenge dieser Sprache definiert, die zudem das derzeitige Zentrum weiterer Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Auszeichnungssprachen darstellt. Der entwickelte Ansatz zur Modellierung linguistischer Information basiert auf der Extensible Markup Language (XML), wobei die weitergehenden Möglichkeiten von SGML selbstverständlich ebenfalls dargestellt und diskutiert werden. Mittels XML können Informationen, die sich nicht in bestimmten Hierarchien (mittels mathematischer Bäume) strukturieren lassen, nicht in einer natürlichen Weise repräsentiert werden. Eine Lösung dieses Problems liegt in der Aufteilung der Strukturierung auf verschiedene Ebenen. Diese neue Lösung wird dargestellt, diskutiert und modelliert.
The principal claim of this dissertation is that there is a unique structural core shared by Double Object, Dative Experiencer and Existential/Presentational constructions. This core is argued to take the form of a Cipient Predication structure, `cipient covering traditional notions like (affected) source/goal, recipient, indirect object or dative experiencer. Central questions arising in defining Cipient Predication are: How are cipients thematically licensed, and what is the role of there in argument-structural terms? What is the structural locus of cipients/there? What is the role and nature of dative case? How can the possessive interpretation, the blocking and definiteness effects associated with the above-mentioned constructions be explained? Cipients are presented as external arguments and logical subjects (location individuals) of predicates derived from a propositional meaning embedded in the VP, the predicate formed by a lower tense head `little t that is overtly realized as there. Little t is argued to encode a distinction at the reference time level, structural dative hinging on a tense property like structural nominative. The cipient relates as a whole to a part to a VP-internal location argument that together with the theme furnishes the propositional meaning (`possession ). As logical subjects, cipients anchor the predicate to the utterance context, forcing its interpretation in extralinguistic terms (`blocking effects ). It is proposed that lacking structurally encoded subjects, Existential/Presentational constructions are not saturated expressions in syntax, precluding the interpretation of certain quantifiers (most/every, vide `definiteness effects ). Cipient Predication, couched in terms of the Minimalist Program (in particular, Chomsky 1999) and a semantics relying on tense and the ontological distinction of locations as well as scalar and part-whole structure, should be of interest to scholars working on datives, argument structure, and the syntax/semantics/pragmatics interface more generally.
This dissertation investigates discourse-pragmatic differences between variably linked arguments appearing in alternating argument structure constructions in the sense of Goldberg (1995) and Kay (manuscript). The properties that are studied include givenness, pragmatic relation (topic/focus), salience of referents, animacy, and others. They derive from the literature on sentence-type constructions such as topicalization and from research on the referential properties of NP form types.
The research carried out here has multiple uses. At the most basic level, it serves as an empirical check on existing characterizations of the pragmatic properties of the relevant arguments that are the result of syntactic and semantic analysis based on introspection alone. For instance, for the epistemic raising alternation involving verbs like seem, the predicted topicality difference between the subjects of the raised and unraised constructions (Langacker 1995) could not be confirmed.
This dissertation also addresses the question what kinds of pragmatic factors, if any, are relevant to argument structure constructions. Based on the evidence of the dative alternation, it does not seem to be the case that the kind of pragmatic influences on argument structure constructions are different or limited compared to the ones found to be relevant to sentence-type constructions.
The kind of research undertaken here can also inform the syntactic and semantic analysis of constructions. In the case of the dative alternation, the discourse-pragmatic characteristics of the variably linked arguments provide evidence that Basilico’s (1998) analysis of the difference between the alternates in terms of VP-shells and a difference between thetic and categorical ‘inner’ predication, on the one hand does not account for all the data and on the other can be re-stated in pragmatic terms other than the thetic-categorical distinction.
In addition to studies of valence alternations, this dissertation also discusses various null instantiation phenomena, which provide further evidence for the need to specify discourse-pragmatic properties as part of argument structure constructions and lexical entries.
Finally, it is suggested that the use of randomly sampled corpus data and statistical modelling throughout this dissertation improves both empirical and analytical coverage.