Refine
Document Type
- Part of a Book (1)
- Conference Proceeding (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Einbettung <Linguistik> (2)
- Contrary and complementary opposites (1)
- Formale Semantik (1)
- German interrogative embedding predicates (1)
- Interrogativlogik (1)
- Neg-raising (1)
- Pro-Form (1)
- Prädikat (1)
- Semantik (1)
- Syntax (1)
Publicationstate
- Postprint (2) (remove)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (1)
German subjectively veridical sicher sein ‘be certain’ can embed ob-clauses in negative contexts, while subjectively veridical glauben ‘believe’ and nonveridical möglich sein ‘be possible’ cannot. The Logical Form of F isn’t certain if M is in Rome is regarded as the negated disjunction of two sentences ¬(cf σ ∨ cf ¬σ) or ¬cf σ ∧ ¬cf ¬σ. Be certain can have this LF because ¬cf σ and ¬cf ¬σ are compatible and nonveridical. Believe excludes this LF because ¬bf σ and ¬bf ¬σ are incompatible in a question-under-discussion context. It follows from this incompatibility and from the incompatibility of bf σ and bf ¬σ that bf ¬σ and ¬bf σ are equivalent. Therefore believe cannot be nonveridical. Be possible doesn’t allow the LF either. Similar to believe, ¬pf σ and ¬pf ¬σ are incompatible. But unlike believe, pf σ and pf ¬σ are compatible.