Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Which Dimensions of Narratives are Relevant for Human Judgments of Story Equivalence?

  • We present an experimental approach to determining natural dimensions of story comparison. The results show that untrained test subjects generally do not privilege structural information. When asked to justify sameness ratings, they may refer to content, but when asked to state differences, they mostly refer to style, concrete events, details and motifs. We conclude that adequate formal models of narratives must represent such non-structural data.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Bernhard FisseniGND, Benedikt LöweGND
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-81864
URL:http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2012/workshops/20.Narrative%20Proceedings.pdf
Parent Title (English):Proceedings of The Third Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN '12)
Place of publication:İstanbul
Editor:Mark A. Finlayson
Document Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2012
Date of Publication (online):2018/11/02
Publicationstate:Zweitveröffentlichung
Reviewstate:Peer-Review
Tag:computational models of narrative
GND Keyword:Computerlinguistik; Erzählforschung; Handlungsstruktur <Literatur>; Vergleichbarkeit
First Page:112
Last Page:116
Dewey Decimal Classification:400 Sprache / 400 Sprache, Linguistik
Linguistics-Classification:Computerlinguistik
Open Access?:Ja
Licence (German):Es gilt das UrhG