Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Automatic acquisition of LFG resources for German - as good as it gets

  • We present data-driven methods for the acquisition of LFG resources from two German treebanks. We discuss problems specific to semi-free word order languages as well as problems arising from the data structures determined by the design of the different treebanks. We compare two ways of encoding semi-free word order, as done in the two German treebanks, and argue that the design of the TiGer treebank is more adequate for the acquisition of LFG resources. Furthermore, we describe an architecture for LFG grammar acquisition for German, based on the two German treebanks, and compare our results with a hand-crafted German LFG grammar.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Ines Rehbein, Josef van Genabith
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-57504
Parent Title (English):Proceedings of the 14th International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference (LFG 2009). Cambridge, United Kingdom. July 13 - 16, 2009
Publisher:CSLI Publications
Place of publication:Stanford
Editor:Miriam Butt, Holoway King
Document Type:Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2009
Date of Publication (online):2017/01/09
Publicationstate:Veröffentlichungsversion
Reviewstate:(Verlags)-Lektorat
Tag:German; Lexical functional grammar; Machine translating
GND Keyword:Deutsch; Korpus <Linguistik>; Lexikalisch funktionale Grammatik
Pagenumber:21
Dewey Decimal Classification:400 Sprache / 430 Deutsch
BDSL-Classification:Grammatik
Linguistics-Classification:Computerlinguistik
Linguistics-Classification:Korpuslinguistik
Open Access?:Ja
Licence (English):License LogoCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International