Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Comprehensible legal texts – utopia or a question of wording? On processing rephrased German court decisions

  • This paper presents a study on the comprehensibility of rephrased syntactic structures in German court decisions. While there are a number of studies using psycholinguistic methods to investigate the comprehensibility of original legal texts, we are not aware of any study looking into the effect resolving complex structures has on the comprehensibility. Our study combines three methodological steps. First, we analyse an annotated corpus of court decisions, press releases and newspaper reports on these decisions in order to detect those complex structures in the decisions which distinguish them from the other text types. Secondly, these structures are rephrased into two increasingly simple versions. Finally, all versions are subjected to a self paced reading experiment. The findings suggest that rephrasing greatly enhances the comprehensibility for the lay reader.

Export metadata

Additional Services

Share in Twitter Search Google Scholar

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Author:Sandra Hansen, Ralf Dirksen, Kerstin Kunz, Martin Küchler, Stella Neumann
URN:urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-33997
Parent Title (English):Hermes : Journal of Language and Communication Studies
Document Type:Article
Language:English
Year of first Publication:2006
Date of Publication (online):2015/01/20
GND Keyword:Deutsch; Korpus <Linguistik>; Rechtssprache; Syntax
Volume:36
First Page:15
Last Page:40
Dewey Decimal Classification:400 Sprache / 430 Deutsch
Linguistics-Classification:Syntax
Open Access?:Ja
Licence (German):Es gilt das UrhG