Automatic acquisition of LFG resources for German - as good as it gets
- We present data-driven methods for the acquisition of LFG resources from two German treebanks. We discuss problems specific to semi-free word order languages as well as problems arising from the data structures determined by the design of the different treebanks. We compare two ways of encoding semi-free word order, as done in the two German treebanks, and argue that the design of the TiGer treebank is more adequate for the acquisition of LFG resources. Furthermore, we describe an architecture for LFG grammar acquisition for German, based on the two German treebanks, and compare our results with a hand-crafted German LFG grammar.
Author: | Ines Rehbein, Josef van Genabith |
---|---|
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-57504 |
Parent Title (English): | Proceedings of the 14th International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference (LFG 2009). Cambridge, United Kingdom. July 13 - 16, 2009 |
Publisher: | CSLI Publications |
Place of publication: | Stanford |
Editor: | Miriam Butt, Holoway King |
Document Type: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Year of first Publication: | 2009 |
Date of Publication (online): | 2017/01/09 |
Publicationstate: | Veröffentlichungsversion |
Reviewstate: | (Verlags)-Lektorat |
Tag: | German; Lexical functional grammar; Machine translating |
GND Keyword: | Deutsch; Korpus <Linguistik>; Lexikalisch funktionale Grammatik |
Page Number: | 21 |
DDC classes: | 400 Sprache / 430 Deutsch |
Open Access?: | ja |
BDSL-Classification: | Grammatik |
Linguistics-Classification: | Computerlinguistik |
Linguistics-Classification: | Korpuslinguistik |
Licence (English): | ![]() |