@article{SchoefflerSpranzFogasy2012, author = {Sch{\"o}ffler, Marta and Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {ja m_hm Patientenreaktionen auf pr{\"a}diagnostische Mitteilungen}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Angewandte Linguistik}, volume = {57}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2190-0191}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-8764}, pages = {1 -- 32}, year = {2012}, abstract = {This article focuses on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of patients' responses to different types of doctors' prediagnostic statements. Prediagnostic statements document the doctors' process of understanding in the on going interactive event and simultaneously move it to an intersubjective level within the boundaries of communicability, for example, in the case of problematic symptom patterns. Four types of prediagnostic statements will be distinguished: the preliminary, unspecific diagnosis, the establishing of a (causal) link, information about the findings, and diagnoses of exclusion. On the basis of 29 doctor-patient-conversations, 150 patients' responses to prediagnostic statements are analyzed in their contextual organization. Although many patients' responses turn out to be affirmatively minimal, there are differences both in the elaborateness and regarding the reference type, depending on the statements' degree of certainty, the patients' self-diagnoses as well as on influences of the interaction type's asymmetrical properties. Both patients and doctors work together on establishing interactive and epistemic territories and pay attention to the maintenance of their self-images and their interaction relationship.}, language = {de} } @article{DeppermannSpranzFogasy2011, author = {Deppermann, Arnulf and Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {Doctors' questions as displays of understanding}, series = {Communication \& medicine : an interdisciplinary journal of healthcare, ethics and society}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, publisher = {Equinox Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {1613-3625}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-10634}, pages = {111 -- 122}, year = {2011}, abstract = {Based on German data from history-taking in doctor-patient interaction, the paper shows that the three basic syntactic types of questions (questions fronted by a question-word (w-questions), verb-first (V1) questions, and declarative questions) provide different opportunities for displaying understanding in medical interaction. Each syntactic questionformat is predominantly used in a different stage of topical sequences in history taking: w-questions presuppose less knowledge and are thus used to open up topical sequences; declarative questions are used to check already achieved understandings and to close topical sequences. Still, the expected scope of answers to yes/no-questions and to declarative questions is less restricted than previously thought. The paper focuses in detail on the doctors' use of formulations as declarative questions, which are designed to make patients elaborate on already established topics, giving more details or accounting for a confirmation. Formulations often involve a shift to psychological aspects of the illness. Although patients confirm doctors' empathetic formulations, they, however, regularly do not align with this shift, returning to the description of symptoms and to biomedical accounts instead. The study shows how displays of understanding are responded to not only in terms of correctness, but also (and more importantly) in terms of their relevance for further action.}, language = {en} } @misc{SpranzFogasyBeckerMenzetal.2014, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas and Becker, Maria and Menz, Florian and Nowak, Peter}, title = {Literatur zur Medizinischen Kommunikation [Bibliografie]}, edition = {Stand: 10. Februar 2014 [erweiterte Version, 5220 Titel]}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Deutsche Sprache}, address = {Mannheim}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-50717}, pages = {298}, year = {2014}, language = {de} } @incollection{SpranzFogasy2016, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {Was denkt der Arzt, was sagt er? Hypothesenbildungsprozesse in einem {\"a}rztlichen Gespr{\"a}ch}, series = {Texte. Seit 1386. Gedichte - Kurzprosa - Sprachdaten}, editor = {Felder, Ekkehard and Lieb, Ludger}, publisher = {Winter}, address = {Heidelberg}, isbn = {978-3-8253-6576-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-51356}, pages = {245 -- 252}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @book{MackNikendeiEhrenthaletal.2016, author = {Mack, Christina and Nikendei, Christoph and Ehrenthal, Johannes C. and Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {„[...] hab ich glaub ich die richtigen fragen gestellt". Therapeutische Fragehandlungen in psychodiagnostischen Gespr{\"a}chen}, publisher = {Institut f{\"u}r Deutsche Sprache}, address = {Mannheim}, issn = {1860-9422}, doi = {10.14618/opal_03-2016}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-57250}, series = {OPAL - Online publizierte Arbeiten zur Linguistik}, number = {2016.3}, pages = {98}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Sprache ist in der Psychotherapie nicht nur Verst{\"a}ndigungsmittel, sondern zugleich diagnostisches und therapeutisches Instrument, und therapeutische Fragen sind dabei ein zentraler Handlungstyp. Welche Typen von Fragen vorkommen und welche Funktionen sie f{\"u}r das diagnostische und therapeutische Handeln haben, ist hier Gegenstand einer linguistisch-gespr{\"a}chsanalytischen Untersuchung. Den Forschungskontext bildet eine Kooperation von Psychotherapeuten und Linguisten zur Weiterentwicklung von Theorie und Praxis der psychotherapeutischen Anamneseerhebung.}, language = {de} } @book{SpranzFogasy1992, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {Bezugspunkte der Kontextualisierung sprachlicher Ausdr{\"u}cke in Interaktionen : ein Konzept zur analytischen Konstitution von Schl{\"u}sselw{\"o}rtern}, series = {Arbeiten aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 245 "Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext" ; 50}, volume = {50}, address = {Mannheim, Heidelberg}, isbn = {0941-990}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-5381}, pages = {31}, year = {1992}, language = {de} } @book{SpranzFogasy1986, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {"widersprechen" : zu Form und Funktion eines Aktivit{\"a}tstyps in Schlichtungsgespr{\"a}chen}, publisher = {Narr}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, isbn = {3-87808-462-5}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-5157}, series = {Forschungsberichte des Instituts f{\"u}r deutsche Sprache}, number = {62}, pages = {216}, year = {1986}, language = {de} } @article{SpranzFogasyFleischmannHoferetal.1993, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas and Fleischmann, Thomas and Hofer, Manfred and Pikowsky, Birgit}, title = {Negative Reaktionszyklen in Konfliktgespr{\"a}chen : quantitative und qualitative Sequenzanalysen}, series = {Deutsche Sprache : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation}, volume = {21}, publisher = {E. Schmidt}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0340-9341}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-5071}, pages = {63 -- 79}, year = {1993}, language = {de} } @article{SpranzFogasyFleischmann1993, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas and Fleischmann, Thomas}, title = {Types of dispute courses in family interaction}, series = {Argumentation : an international journal on reasoning}, volume = {7}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {0920-427}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-5087}, pages = {221 -- 235}, year = {1993}, language = {en} } @article{SpranzFogasy1988, author = {Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas}, title = {Medikamente im Gespr{\"a}ch zwischen Arzt und Patient : Gespr{\"a}chsanalysen f{\"u}r die Praxis}, series = {Deutsche Sprache : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation}, volume = {3}, publisher = {E. Schmidt}, address = {Bern}, issn = {0340-9341}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-5093}, pages = {240 -- 258}, year = {1988}, language = {de} }