@article{MuellerSpitzerNiedCurcioDominguezVazquezetal.2019,
  author    = {Carolin M{\"u}ller-Spitzer and Martina Nied Curcio and Mar{\´i}a Jos{\´e} Dominguez V{\´a}zquez and Idalete Maria Silva Dias and Sascha Wolfer},
  title     = {Recherchepraxis bei der Verbesserung von Interferenzfehlern aus dem Italienischen, Portugiesischen und Spanischen: Eine explorative Beobachtungsstudie mit DaF-Lernenden},
  series   = {Lexicographica. International annual for lexicography},
  volume    = {34},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1865-9403},
  doi       = {10.1515/lex-2018-340108},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-88335},
  pages     = {157 -- 182},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {In the past two decades, more and more dictionary usage studies have been published, but most of them deal with the question what users appreciate about dictionaries, which dictionaries they use and which information they need in specific situations. These studies presuppose that users indeed consult lexicographic resources. However, language teachers and lecturers of linguistics often have the impression that students use too few high-quality dictionaries in their every-day work. Against this background, we started an international cooperation project to collect empirical data evaluating that impression. Our aim was to evaluate what students (here from the Romance language area) actually do when they correct language problems. We used a new methodological setting to do this (screen recording with a thinking-aloud task). The empirical data we gained offers a broad insight into what language users really do when solving language-related tasks today.},
  language  = {de}
}