@inproceedings{KueglerSmolibockiArnoldetal.2017,
  author    = {Frank K{\"u}gler and Bernadett Smolibocki and Denis Arnold and Stefan Baumann and Bettina Braun and Martine Grice and Stefanie Jannedy and Jan Michalsky and Oliver Niebuhr and J{\"o}rg Peters and Simon Ritter and Christine T. R{\"o}hr and Antje Schweitzer and Katrin Schweitzer and Petra Wagner},
  title     = {DIMA – Annotation guidelines for German intonation},
  series = {Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences},
  publisher = {University of Glasgow},
  address   = {Glasgow, UK},
  isbn      = {978-0-85261-941-4},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-59456},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This paper presents newly developed guidelines for prosodic annotation of German as a consensus system agreed upon by German intonologists. The DIMA system is rooted in the framework of autosegmental-metrical phonology. One important goal of the consensus is to make exchanging data between groups easier since German intonation is currently annotated according to different models. To this end, we aim to provide guidelines that are easy to learn. The guidelines were evaluated running an inter-annotator reliability study on three different speech styles (read speech, monologue and dialogue). The overall high κ between 0.76 and 0.89 (depending on the speech style) shows that the DIMA conventions can be applied successfully.},
  language  = {en}
}