@incollection{HartmannHegedűsSuranyi2016,
  author    = {Jutta M. Hartmann and Veronika Hegedűs and Bal{\´a}zs Sur{\´a}nyi},
  title     = {Pseudoclefts in Hungarian},
  series = {Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 13: Papers from the 2011 Lund conference},
  editor    = {Johan Brandtler and Val{\´e}ria Moln{\´a}r and Christer Platzack},
  publisher = {Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam/Philadelphia},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-0483-7},
  doi       = {10.1075/atoh.13.05har},
  pages     = {67 -- 97},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Based on novel data from Hungarian, this paper makes the case that in at least some languages specificational pseudocleft sentences must receive a ‘what-you- see-is-what-you-get’ syntactic analysis. More specifically, it is argued that the clefted constituent is the subject of predication (underlyingly base-generated in Spec, Pr), whereas the cleft clause acts as a predicate in the structure. Alongside connectivity effects characteristic of specificational pseudoclefts, we also discuss a range of anti-connectivity effects, which we show to receive a straightforward explanation under the proposed analysis. It follows that attested connectivity effects, in turn, require a semantic, rather than a syntactic account, along the lines of Jacobson (1994) and Sharvit (1999).},
  language  = {en}
}