@incollection{Raffelsiefen2016,
  author    = {Renate Raffelsiefen},
  title     = {Evidence for word-internal phonological words in German},
  series = {Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis},
  editor    = {Rolf Thieroff and Matthias Tamrat and Nanna Fuhrhop and Oliver Teuber},
  publisher = {Niemeyer},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  isbn      = {3-484-73053-6},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110933932.43},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:mh39-48969},
  pages     = {43 -- 56},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The phonological word (henceforth pword) differs from lower units of the prosodic hierarchy (e.g. foot, syllable) in that its boundaries must align with morphological boundaries. While languages are claimed to differ w.r.t. the questions of whether and which word-internal constituents (e.g. stems, prefixes, suffixes, members of compounds) form a pword there is no consensus regarding the question of which diagnostics are relevant for determining pword structure. In this paper it is argued that systematic correlations between various suprasegmental properties (e.g. stress patterns, syllable structure) motivate the existence of word-internal pwords in German.},
  language  = {en}
}