Refine
Year of publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (68)
- Conference Proceeding (51)
- Book (15)
- Article (14)
- Other (2)
- Part of Periodical (1)
Keywords
- Korpus <Linguistik> (125)
- Deutsch (40)
- Deutsches Referenzkorpus (DeReKo) (18)
- Corpus linguistics (15)
- Kontrastive Linguistik (15)
- corpus linguistics (14)
- Corpus technology (12)
- Annotation (11)
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache <Mannheim> (11)
- Sprachdaten (11)
Publicationstate
- Veröffentlichungsversion (101)
- Zweitveröffentlichung (32)
- Postprint (4)
Reviewstate
- Peer-Review (81)
- (Verlags)-Lektorat (50)
- Verlags-Lektorat (2)
Publisher
Editorial
(2016)
CMC Corpora in DeReKo
(2017)
We introduce three types of corpora of computer-mediated communication that have recently been compiled at the Institute for the German Language or curated from an external project and included in DeReKo, the German Reference Corpus, namely Wikipedia (discussion) corpora, the Usenet news corpus, and the Dortmund Chat Corpus. The data and corpora have been converted to I5, the TEI customization to represent texts in DeReKo, and are researchable via the web-based IDS corpus research interfaces and in the case of Wikipedia and chat also downloadable from the IDS repository and download server, respectively.
We evaluate a graph-based dependency parser on DeReKo, a large corpus of contemporary German. The dependency parser is trained on the German dataset from the SPMRL 2014 Shared Task which contains text from the news domain, whereas DeReKo also covers other domains including fiction, science, and technology. To avoid the need for costly manual annotation of the corpus, we use the parser’s probability estimates for unlabeled and labeled attachment as main evaluation criterion. We show that these probability estimates are highly correlated with the actual attachment scores on a manually annotated test set. On this basis, we compare estimated parsing scores for the individual domains in DeReKo, and show that the scores decrease with increasing distance of a domain to the training corpus.
This paper addresses long-term archival for large corpora. Three aspects specific to language resources are focused, namely (1) the removal of resources for legal reasons, (2) versioning of (unchanged) objects in constantly growing resources, especially where objects can be part of multiple releases but also part of different collections, and (3) the conversion of data to new formats for digital preservation. It is motivated why language resources may have to be changed, and why formats may need to be converted. As a solution, the use of an intermediate proxy object called a signpost is suggested. The approach will be exemplified with respect to the corpora of the Leibniz Institute for the German Language in Mannheim, namely the German Reference Corpus (DeReKo) and the Archive for Spoken German (AGD).
This paper reports on the latest developments of the European Reference Corpus EuReCo and the German Reference Corpus in relation to three of the most important CMLC topics: interoperability, collaboration on corpus infrastructure building, and legal issues. Concerning interoperability, we present new ways to access DeReKo via KorAP on the API and on the plugin level. In addition we report about advancements in the EuReCo- and ICC-initiatives with the provision of comparable corpora, and about recent problems with license acquisitions and our solution approaches using an indemnification clause and model licenses that include scientific exploitation.
Einleitung
(2018)
Sehr große Korpora – wie das Deutsche Referenzkorpus DeReKo – bieten eine breite Basis für die empirische Forschung. Sie bringen aber auch Herausforderungen mit sich, da sich weder Eigenschaften ihrer Zusammensetzung noch derer von Recherche- und Analyseergebnissen mit einfachen Mitteln erschließen lassen. Dafür bedarf es Verfahren geschickter Sortierung, Gruppierung oder des Clusterings, kurzum: strukturentdeckender Methoden. In Kombination mit Visualisierungstechniken kann so die Wahrnehmung bestimmter Eigenschaften und Zusammenhänge unterstützt und die Aufmerksamkeit auf bestimmte Phänomene, ggf. in Anlehnung an präferenzrelationale Befunde, gelenkt werden. Neben der illustrativen Funktion geht es in diesem Beitrag vor allem um das erkenntnisleitende Potenzial derartiger Verfahren in Kombination. Aus verschiedenen Bereichen werden Beispiele gezeigt, die am IDS oder in Kooperationen zum Einsatz kommen, sowohl zur dokumentarischen und reflexiven Kontrolle von Eigenschaften der Korpuszusammensetzung als auch hinsichtlich korpusanalytischer Methodik, um die qualitative Interpretation von Analysebefunden und die Abduktion von Hypothesen stimulierend zu unterstützen.
Korpuslinguistik
(2012)
We present the use of count-based and predictive language models for exploring language use in the German Reference Corpus DeReKo. For collocation analysis along the syntagmatic axis we employ traditional association measures based on co-occurrence counts as well as predictive association measures derived from the output weights of skipgram word embeddings. For inspecting the semantic neighbourhood of words along the paradigmatic axis we visualize the high dimensional word embeddings in two dimensions using t-stochastic neighbourhood embeddings. Together, these visualizations provide a complementary, explorative approach to analysing very large corpora in addition to corpus querying. Moreover, we discuss count-based and predictive models w.r.t. scalability and maintainability in very large corpora.